• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用离散选择实验理解社区卫生工作者的激励偏好:肯尼亚、乌干达、孟加拉国和海地的多国家方案。

Understanding incentive preferences of community health workers using discrete choice experiments: a multicountry protocol for Kenya, Uganda, Bangladesh and Haiti.

机构信息

Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

Population Council, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 11;9(12):e033601. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033601.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033601
PMID:31831550
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6924748/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

There is a renewed global interest in improving community health worker (CHW) programmes. For CHW programmes to be effective, key intervention design factors which contribute to the performance of CHWs need to be identified. The recent WHO guidelines recommends the combination of financial and non-financial incentives to improve CHW performance. However, evidence gaps remain as to what package of incentives will improve their performance in different country contexts. This study aims to evaluate CHW incentive preferences to improve performance and retention which will strengthen CHW programmes and help governments leverage limited resources appropriately.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A discrete choice experiment (DCE) will be conducted with CHWs in Bangladesh, Haiti, Kenya and Uganda with different levels of maturity of CHWs programmes. This will be carried out in two phases. Phase 1 will involve preliminary qualitative research including focus group discussions (FGDs) and key informant interviews to develop the DCE design which will include attributes relevant to the CHW country settings. Phase 2 will involve a DCE survey with CHWs, presenting them with a series of job choices with varying attribute levels. An orthogonal design will be used to generate the choice sets for the surveys. The surveys will be administered in locally-appropriate languages to at least 150 CHWs from each of the cadres in each country. Conditional and mixed multinomial logit (MMNL) models will be used for the estimation of stated preferences.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study has been reviewed and approved by the Population Council's Institutional Review Board in New York, and appropriate ethics review boards in Kenya, Uganda, Bangladesh and Haiti. The results of the study will be disseminated through in-country dissemination workshops, meetings with country-level stakeholders and policy working groups, print media, online blogs and peer-reviewed journals.

摘要

简介

提高社区卫生工作者(CHW)计划在全球范围内重新受到关注。为了使 CHW 计划有效,需要确定有助于 CHW 表现的关键干预设计因素。最近的世卫组织指南建议将财务和非财务激励措施相结合,以提高 CHW 的绩效。然而,在不同的国家背景下,哪种激励方案将提高他们的绩效,仍存在证据差距。本研究旨在评估 CHW 的激励偏好,以提高绩效和保留率,从而加强 CHW 计划,并帮助政府合理利用有限的资源。

方法和分析

将在孟加拉国、海地、肯尼亚和乌干达开展一项离散选择实验(DCE),这些国家的 CHW 计划有不同的成熟度。这将分两个阶段进行。第一阶段将包括初步的定性研究,包括焦点小组讨论(FGD)和关键知情人访谈,以制定 DCE 设计,其中将包括与 CHW 国家背景相关的属性。第二阶段将涉及 CHW 的 DCE 调查,向他们展示一系列具有不同属性水平的工作选择。将使用正交设计为调查生成选择集。将以当地适当的语言向每个国家的每个职系至少 150 名 CHW 进行调查。将使用条件和混合多项逻辑回归(MMNL)模型来估计陈述的偏好。

伦理和传播

这项研究已经在纽约的人口理事会机构审查委员会以及肯尼亚、乌干达、孟加拉国和海地的适当伦理审查委员会进行了审查和批准。研究结果将通过在国内的传播研讨会、与国家一级利益攸关方和政策工作组的会议、印刷媒体、在线博客和同行评议期刊进行传播。

相似文献

1
Understanding incentive preferences of community health workers using discrete choice experiments: a multicountry protocol for Kenya, Uganda, Bangladesh and Haiti.使用离散选择实验理解社区卫生工作者的激励偏好:肯尼亚、乌干达、孟加拉国和海地的多国家方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 11;9(12):e033601. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033601.
2
Understanding community health worker incentive preferences in Uganda using a discrete choice experiment.利用离散选择实验了解乌干达社区卫生工作者的激励偏好。
J Glob Health. 2021 Mar 10;11:07005. doi: 10.7189/jogh.11.07005.
3
Salaried and voluntary community health workers: exploring how incentives and expectation gaps influence motivation.受薪和志愿社区卫生工作者:探索激励措施和期望差距如何影响动机。
Hum Resour Health. 2019 Jul 19;17(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12960-019-0387-z.
4
Incentive preferences for community health volunteers in Kenya: findings from a discrete choice experiment.肯尼亚社区卫生志愿者的激励偏好:来自离散选择实验的发现。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 5;11(7):e048059. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048059.
5
Qualitative Assessment of the Application of a Discrete Choice Experiment With Community Health Workers in Uganda: Aligning Incentives With Preferences.定性评估离散选择实验在乌干达社区卫生工作者中的应用:使激励与偏好保持一致。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2016 Dec 28;4(4):684-693. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00070. Print 2016 Dec 23.
6
Understanding Factors That Support Community Health Worker Motivation, Job Satisfaction, and Performance in Three Ugandan Districts: Opportunities for Strengthening Uganda's Community Health Worker Program.理解支持社区卫生工作者在乌干达三个地区的激励、工作满意度和绩效的因素:加强乌干达社区卫生工作者计划的机会。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Dec 19;11(12):2886-2894. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.6219. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
7
Payday, ponchos, and promotions: a qualitative analysis of perspectives from non-governmental organization programme managers on community health worker motivation and incentives.发薪日、雨披与晋升:对非政府组织项目管理人员关于社区卫生工作者激励与动机观点的定性分析
Hum Resour Health. 2014 Dec 5;12:66. doi: 10.1186/1478-4491-12-66.
8
The relative importance of material and non-material incentives for community health workers: Evidence from a discrete choice experiment in Western Kenya.物质激励和非物质激励对社区卫生工作者的相对重要性:来自肯尼亚西部一项离散选择实验的证据。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Feb;246:112726. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112726. Epub 2019 Dec 7.
9
Keeping community health workers in Uganda motivated: key challenges, facilitators, and preferred program inputs.保持乌干达社区卫生工作者的积极性:主要挑战、促进因素和首选方案投入。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2014 Jan 29;2(1):103-16. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-13-00140. eCollection 2014 Feb.
10
Retention of female volunteer community health workers in Dhaka urban slums: a case-control study.达卡城市贫民窟中女性志愿社区卫生工作者的保留:一项病例对照研究。
Health Policy Plan. 2012 Sep;27(6):477-86. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czr059. Epub 2011 Sep 7.

引用本文的文献

1
The feasibility, acceptability, cost and benefits of a "communities of practice" model for improving the quality of childcare centres: a mixed-methods study in the informal settlements in Nairobi.“实践共同体”模式提高儿童保育中心质量的可行性、可接受性、成本和效益:内罗毕非正规住区的混合方法研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Aug 1;11:1194978. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1194978. eCollection 2023.
2
Patient and health worker perspectives on quality of HIV care and treatment services in Haiti.海地艾滋病毒护理和治疗服务的患者和卫生工作者观点。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jan 23;23(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09041-2.
3
Optimizing the Practice Environment for Medical Staff in the Post-pandemic Era: A Discrete Choice Experiment.优化后疫情时代医务人员的执业环境:离散选择实验。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 18;10:911868. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.911868. eCollection 2022.
4
Incentive preferences for community health volunteers in Kenya: findings from a discrete choice experiment.肯尼亚社区卫生志愿者的激励偏好:来自离散选择实验的发现。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 5;11(7):e048059. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048059.
5
Paying for performance to improve the delivery of health interventions in low- and middle-income countries.按绩效付费以改善中低收入国家卫生干预措施的提供。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 May 5;5(5):CD007899. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007899.pub3.
6
Development and validation of a multi-dimensional scale to assess community health worker motivation.多维评估社区卫生工作者激励措施的量表的制定与验证。
J Glob Health. 2021 Mar 10;11:07008. doi: 10.7189/jogh.11.07008.
7
Understanding community health worker incentive preferences in Uganda using a discrete choice experiment.利用离散选择实验了解乌干达社区卫生工作者的激励偏好。
J Glob Health. 2021 Mar 10;11:07005. doi: 10.7189/jogh.11.07005.
8
Understanding the importance of non-material factors in retaining community health workers in low-income settings: a qualitative case-study in Ethiopia.理解非物质因素在低收入环境下留住社区卫生工作者的重要性:埃塞俄比亚的一项定性案例研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 8;10(10):e037989. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037989.

本文引用的文献

1
What do community health workers want? Findings of a discrete choice experiment among Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHAs) in India.社区卫生工作者想要什么?印度认证社会健康活动家(ASHAs)离散选择实验的结果。
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 May 31;4(3):e001509. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001509. eCollection 2019.
2
What do we know about community-based health worker programs? A systematic review of existing reviews on community health workers.我们对基于社区的卫生工作者项目了解多少?对社区卫生工作者现有综述的系统评价。
Hum Resour Health. 2018 Aug 16;16(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12960-018-0304-x.
3
Ongoing training of community health workers in low-income andmiddle-income countries: a systematic scoping review of the literature.低收入和中等收入国家社区卫生工作者的持续培训:文献的系统综述
BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 28;8(4):e021467. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021467.
4
Assessment of the societal and individual preferences for fertility treatment in Australia: study protocol for stated preference discrete choice experiments.澳大利亚社会和个人对生育治疗的偏好评估:基于陈述偏好离散选择实验的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 14;8(2):e020509. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020509.
5
Affordability of comprehensive community health worker programmes in rural sub-Saharan Africa.撒哈拉以南非洲农村地区综合社区卫生工作者项目的可负担性
BMJ Glob Health. 2017 Sep 25;2(3):e000391. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000391. eCollection 2017.
6
An exploration of facilitators and challenges in the scale-up of a national, public sector community health worker cadre in Zambia: a qualitative study.赞比亚国家公共部门社区卫生工作者队伍扩大过程中的促进因素与挑战探索:一项定性研究
Hum Resour Health. 2017 Jun 24;15(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12960-017-0214-3.
7
Qualitative Assessment of the Application of a Discrete Choice Experiment With Community Health Workers in Uganda: Aligning Incentives With Preferences.定性评估离散选择实验在乌干达社区卫生工作者中的应用:使激励与偏好保持一致。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2016 Dec 28;4(4):684-693. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00070. Print 2016 Dec 23.
8
The global shortage of health workers-an opportunity to transform care.全球卫生工作者短缺——一个转变医疗服务的契机。
Lancet. 2016 Nov 26;388(10060):2576-2577. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32235-8.
9
Motivation and incentive preferences of community health officers in Ghana: an economic behavioral experiment approach.加纳社区卫生官员的动机和激励偏好:一种经济行为实验方法。
Hum Resour Health. 2016 Aug 22;14(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12960-016-0148-1.
10
Optimising the benefits of community health workers' unique position between communities and the health sector: A comparative analysis of factors shaping relationships in four countries.优化社区卫生工作者在社区和卫生部门之间独特地位的优势:对四个国家影响关系形成因素的比较分析。
Glob Public Health. 2017 Nov;12(11):1404-1432. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2016.1174722. Epub 2016 Apr 30.