Department of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Michigan. 1415 Washington Heights, SPH II, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
School of Public Health, University of Michigan, 1415 Washington Heights, SPH II, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Vaccine. 2022 Aug 26;40(36):5313-5321. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.07.054. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
Evidence-based strategies can maximize vaccination intent and uptake among adults. This systematic review summarizes the existing literature on strategies to improve vaccination intent and uptake among adults in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) to inform future implementation in various populations and contexts.
Eligible studies were identified through a systematic search in Medline, Embase, Cochrane Libraries, as well as grey literature databases published between January 2010 and March 2021. The search was limited to studies in LMICs that evaluated adult vaccination interventions. Data were extracted from the included studies and evaluated against the World Health Organization's Behavioral and Social Drivers of Vaccination Framework. The National Institutes of Health study quality assessment tools were used to evaluate study quality.
The initial literature review identified 2,854 records, 22 of which met the inclusion criteria. The majority (n = 19 or 86%) of studies were from middle-income countries, with the remaining studies (n = 3 or 13%) set in low-income countries. The majority (15/22, 68%) of interventions were multi-component. 82% (18/22) of studies addressed thoughts and feelings, 59% (13/22) addressed social processes, and 73% (16/22) addressed practical issues. Five studies reported primary outcomes of vaccination intent, and the remaining 17 reported vaccine uptake. 36% (8/22) of the studies cited statistically significant positive intervention effects on vaccination intent or uptake. Few of the included studies (6/22, 27%) were RTCs, and most studies (15/22, 68%) were of poor study quality. The studies reporting the highest increase in vaccination intent and uptake were multi-component interventions that addressed all three determinants of vaccination.
The results of this review highlight levers that can be used to encourage vaccine intent and uptake in the ongoing rollout of COVID-19 vaccines, as well as the deployment of other vaccines to adult populations in LMICs. Of the included studies, multicomponent interventions were most effective, mainly when targeting multiple determinants of vaccination. However, poor study quality indicates the need for additional research to validate these findings.
循证策略可以最大限度地提高成年人的疫苗接种意愿和接种率。本系统评价总结了现有的关于提高中低收入国家(LMICs)成年人疫苗接种意愿和接种率的文献,以为在不同人群和背景下的未来实施提供信息。
通过在 Medline、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆以及 2010 年 1 月至 2021 年 3 月期间发表的灰色文献数据库中进行系统搜索,确定了符合条件的研究。搜索范围仅限于评估成人疫苗接种干预措施的 LMICs 研究。从纳入的研究中提取数据,并根据世界卫生组织的疫苗接种行为和社会驱动因素框架进行评估。使用美国国立卫生研究院的研究质量评估工具来评估研究质量。
最初的文献综述确定了 2854 条记录,其中 22 条符合纳入标准。大多数(n=19 或 86%)研究来自中等收入国家,其余研究(n=3 或 13%)来自低收入国家。大多数(15/22,68%)干预措施是多组分的。82%(18/22)的研究涉及思想和感受,59%(13/22)涉及社会过程,73%(16/22)涉及实际问题。五项研究报告了疫苗接种意愿的主要结果,其余 17 项研究报告了疫苗接种率。22 项研究中有 36%(8/22)引用了统计学上显著的对疫苗接种意愿或接种率的积极干预效果。纳入的研究中很少(6/22,27%)是随机对照试验,大多数研究(15/22,68%)质量较差。报告疫苗接种意愿和接种率提高幅度最大的研究是针对疫苗接种所有三个决定因素的多组分干预措施。
本综述的结果突出了可以用来鼓励中低收入国家(LMICs)正在开展的 COVID-19 疫苗接种以及向成年人群体部署其他疫苗的推动因素。在纳入的研究中,多组分干预措施最有效,主要是当针对疫苗接种的多个决定因素时。然而,较差的研究质量表明需要进一步的研究来验证这些发现。