Vaccine Uptake Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
BMJ Open. 2023 Sep 27;13(9):e075414. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075414.
Vaccine coverage remains inequitable globally. Many systematic reviews have looked at the effectiveness of strategies to improve vaccine uptake; however, these reviews frequently lack data from low and middle-income countries (LMICs), where evidence of cost-effective strategies is most valuable. This is partly because reviews often exclude non-randomised, observational or unpublished evaluations that are common in LMICs. Many reviews also exclude multicomponent interventions due to challenges isolating the effect of each component. A comprehensive mapping of multicomponent interventions implemented in LMICs would increase the visibility of studies excluded from systematic reviews and improve comparability of future evaluations by providing guidance for researchers on evaluation frameworks. This scoping review aims to identify, compare and summarise the properties and evaluation methods of multicomponent interventions to improve uptake of routine childhood vaccines in LMICs, and to assess the strengths and limitations of evaluation frameworks applied.
This review will be conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. We will search the following databases: MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, Cochrane, Eldis and Global Health (CAB Direct), Global Index Medicus, 3ie Portal, Google Scholar, COnnecting REpositories, and reference lists. One author will screen titles and abstracts and extract data from included articles using a pretested data extraction template. Uncertainties will be resolved through discussion with another author. Only studies published in English will be included for full review. We will assess the practicability, applicability, sensitivity and specificity of the evaluation frameworks used and present results using descriptive statistics, summary tables and charts.
Ethics approval is not required. The review will be submitted as part of a doctoral thesis, presented at conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals.
疫苗接种覆盖率在全球范围内仍然存在不平等。许多系统评价都研究了提高疫苗接种率的策略的有效性;然而,这些评价经常缺乏来自低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)的数据,而这些国家最需要有成本效益的策略的证据。这在一定程度上是因为评价经常排除了非随机、观察性或未发表的评估,而这些评估在 LMICs 中很常见。许多评价还排除了多组分干预措施,因为难以分离每个组分的效果。全面绘制在 LMICs 中实施的多组分干预措施图谱,将增加从系统评价中排除的研究的可见度,并通过为研究人员提供评估框架的指导,提高未来评估的可比性。这项范围界定综述旨在确定、比较和总结提高 LMICs 常规儿童疫苗接种率的多组分干预措施的特性和评估方法,并评估所应用的评估框架的优缺点。
本综述将使用 Joanna Briggs 研究所的系统评价范围界定方法进行,并根据系统评价和荟萃分析扩展的首选报告项目以及范围界定综述的建议进行报告。我们将搜索以下数据库:MEDLINE、Embase、PubMed、Cochrane、Eldis 和全球健康(CAB Direct)、全球医学索引、3ie 门户、谷歌学术、COnnecting REpositories 和参考文献列表。一名作者将筛选标题和摘要,并使用预先测试的数据提取模板从纳入的文章中提取数据。通过与另一名作者讨论解决不确定性。只有发表英文的研究将被纳入全面审查。我们将评估所使用的评估框架的实用性、适用性、敏感性和特异性,并使用描述性统计、总结表和图表呈现结果。
不需要伦理批准。该综述将作为博士论文的一部分提交,在会议上展示,并发表在同行评议的期刊上。