• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

路面上的普遍影响:罕见的危险往往被忽视。

Taking prevalence effects on the road: Rare hazards are often missed.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Toronto Mississauga, 3359 Mississauga Road, Mississauga, ON, L5L 1C6, Canada.

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Feb;30(1):212-223. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02159-0. Epub 2022 Aug 11.

DOI:10.3758/s13423-022-02159-0
PMID:35953668
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9918605/
Abstract

Previous work has shown that, in many visual search and detection tasks, observers frequently miss rare but important targets, like weapons in bags or abnormalities in radiological images. These prior studies of the low-prevalence effect (LPE) use static stimuli and typically permitted observers to search at will. In contrast, many real-world tasks, like looking for dangerous behavior on the road, only afford observers a brief glimpse of a complex, changing scene before they must make a decision. Can the LPE be a factor in in dynamic, time-limited moments of real driving? To test this, we developed a novel hazard-detection task that preserves much of the perceptual richness and complexity of hazard detection in the real world, while allowing for experimental control over event prevalence. Observers viewed brief video clips of road scenes recorded from dashboard cameras and reported whether they saw a hazardous event. In separate sessions, the prevalence of these events was either high (50% of videos) or low (4%). Under low prevalence, observers missed hazards at more than twice the rate observed in the high-prevalence condition. Follow-up experiments demonstrate that this elevation of miss rate at low prevalence persists when participants were allowed to correct their responses, increases as hazards become increasingly rare (down to 1% prevalence) and is resistant to simple cognitive intervention (participant prebriefing). Together, our results demonstrate that the LPE generalizes to complex perceptual decisions in dynamic natural scenes, such as driving, where observers must monitor and respond to rare hazards.

摘要

先前的研究表明,在许多视觉搜索和检测任务中,观察者经常会错过罕见但重要的目标,例如袋子里的武器或放射学图像中的异常。这些关于低发生率效应 (LPE) 的先前研究使用静态刺激,并且通常允许观察者随意搜索。相比之下,许多现实世界的任务,例如在道路上寻找危险行为,仅在观察者必须做出决定之前,为他们提供一个短暂的机会来观察复杂多变的场景。LPE 是否会影响现实驾驶中的动态、限时时刻?为了测试这一点,我们开发了一种新颖的危险检测任务,该任务保留了现实世界中危险检测的大部分感知丰富性和复杂性,同时允许对事件发生率进行实验控制。观察者观看从仪表盘摄像机录制的道路场景的简短视频剪辑,并报告他们是否看到了危险事件。在单独的会议中,这些事件的发生率要么高(50%的视频),要么低(4%)。在低发生率下,观察者错过危险的速度是高发生率条件下观察到的速度的两倍多。后续实验表明,当参与者被允许纠正他们的反应时,这种低发生率下的错误率升高会持续存在,并且当危险变得越来越罕见(低至 1%的发生率)时,这种升高会增加,并且对简单的认知干预(参与者预告知)具有抵抗力。总之,我们的结果表明,LPE 推广到了动态自然场景中的复杂感知决策,例如驾驶,在这种情况下,观察者必须监测和响应罕见的危险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c9b/9918605/451ef5fd4a84/nihms-1866588-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c9b/9918605/e2628132ccd4/nihms-1866588-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c9b/9918605/af92bb41241e/nihms-1866588-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c9b/9918605/451ef5fd4a84/nihms-1866588-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c9b/9918605/e2628132ccd4/nihms-1866588-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c9b/9918605/af92bb41241e/nihms-1866588-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c9b/9918605/451ef5fd4a84/nihms-1866588-f0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Taking prevalence effects on the road: Rare hazards are often missed.路面上的普遍影响:罕见的危险往往被忽视。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Feb;30(1):212-223. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02159-0. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
2
Highly dangerous road hazards are not immune from the low prevalence effect.高危险道路危险物也不能免受低发生率效应的影响。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024 Feb 2;9(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s41235-024-00531-3.
3
Road Hazard Stimuli: Annotated naturalistic road videos for studying hazard detection and scene perception.道路危险刺激物:标注自然主义道路视频,用于研究危险检测和场景感知。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Apr;56(4):4188-4204. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02299-8. Epub 2023 Dec 11.
4
Predicting road scenes from brief views of driving video.从驾驶视频的简短画面预测道路场景。
J Vis. 2019 May 1;19(5):8. doi: 10.1167/19.5.8.
5
Effects of temporal and spatiotemporal cues on detection of dynamic road hazards.时间和时空线索对动态道路危险检测的影响。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2021 Dec 20;6(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s41235-021-00348-4.
6
Rapid holistic perception and evasion of road hazards.快速整体感知与规避路面障碍物。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020 Mar;149(3):490-500. doi: 10.1037/xge0000665. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
7
Effects of age and auditory and visual dual tasks on closed-road driving performance.年龄以及听觉和视觉双重任务对封闭道路驾驶性能的影响。
Optom Vis Sci. 2005 Aug;82(8):747-54. doi: 10.1097/01.opx.0000174724.74957.45.
8
A hazard perception test for novice drivers.新手驾驶员危险感知测试。
Accid Anal Prev. 2011 Jan;43(1):204-8. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.08.010. Epub 2010 Sep 21.
9
Attentional Differences in a Driving Hazard Perception Task in Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorders.自闭症谱系障碍成年人在驾驶危险感知任务中的注意力差异
J Autism Dev Disord. 2017 Feb;47(2):405-414. doi: 10.1007/s10803-016-2965-4.
10
Object-scene relationships vary the magnitude of target prevalence effects in visual search.物体-场景关系会改变视觉搜索中目标流行效应的大小。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Jun;42(6):766-75. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000183. Epub 2015 Nov 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Rethinking Distraction.重新思考注意力分散
Vis cogn. 2024;32(9-10):959-978. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2024.2335118. Epub 2024 Aug 23.
2
Floor Eggs in Australian Cage-Free Egg Production.澳大利亚无笼蛋生产中的地面蛋
Animals (Basel). 2025 Jul 4;15(13):1967. doi: 10.3390/ani15131967.
3
Highly dangerous road hazards are not immune from the low prevalence effect.高危险道路危险物也不能免受低发生率效应的影响。

本文引用的文献

1
Feedback moderates the effect of prevalence on perceptual decisions.反馈调节了患病率对知觉决策的影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Dec;28(6):1906-1914. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-01956-3. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
2
The timing mega-study: comparing a range of experiment generators, both lab-based and online.时机大研究:比较一系列实验生成器,包括基于实验室的和在线的。
PeerJ. 2020 Jul 20;8:e9414. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9414. eCollection 2020.
3
Rapid holistic perception and evasion of road hazards.快速整体感知与规避路面障碍物。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024 Feb 2;9(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s41235-024-00531-3.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020 Mar;149(3):490-500. doi: 10.1037/xge0000665. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
4
Moments in Time Dataset: One Million Videos for Event Understanding.时间点数据集:用于事件理解的一百万段视频。
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2020 Feb;42(2):502-508. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2019.2901464. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
5
PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy.心理物理学 2 版:简单易用的行为实验。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Feb;51(1):195-203. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y.
6
Prevalence-induced concept change in human judgment.诱发普遍性概念变化的人类判断。
Science. 2018 Jun 29;360(6396):1465-1467. doi: 10.1126/science.aap8731.
7
Driver crash risk factors and prevalence evaluation using naturalistic driving data.使用自然驾驶数据评估驾驶员碰撞风险因素及发生率
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Mar 8;113(10):2636-41. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1513271113. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
8
A critical examination of the evidence for sensitivity loss in modern vigilance tasks.对现代警觉任务中敏感性丧失证据的批判性审视。
Psychol Rev. 2016 Jan;123(1):70-83. doi: 10.1037/rev0000021. Epub 2015 Nov 2.
9
Safety in numbers: more walkers and bicyclists, safer walking and bicycling.人多安全:步行者和骑自行车的人越多,步行和骑自行车就越安全。
Inj Prev. 2015 Aug;21(4):271-5. doi: 10.1136/ip.9.3.205rep.
10
Reducing the vigilance decrement: The effects of perceptual variability.减少警觉性下降:感知变异性的影响。
Conscious Cogn. 2015 May;33:386-97. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.02.010. Epub 2015 Mar 9.