• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于传统感官、理化特性及挥发性成分的酸枣仁酸败前后综合品质评价

Comprehensive Quality Evaluation for Medicinal and Edible Ziziphi Spinosae Semen before and after Rancidity Based on Traditional Sensory, Physicochemical Characteristics, and Volatile Compounds.

作者信息

Liu Zhenying, Xu Liang, Song Pingping, Wu Cui, Xu Bo, Li Zhuojun, Chao Zhimao

机构信息

Institute of Chinese Materia Medica, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, China.

出版信息

Foods. 2022 Aug 3;11(15):2320. doi: 10.3390/foods11152320.

DOI:10.3390/foods11152320
PMID:35954084
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9367921/
Abstract

To comprehensively evaluate the quality of medicinal and edible Ziziphi Spinosae Semen (ZSS, the dried ripe seeds of Ziziphus jujuba var. spinosa) before and after rancidity during storage, some indicators including traditional sensory properties, physicochemical characteristics, and volatile compounds were analyzed. As a result, compared with the normal samples, the rancid samples of ZSS produced a darker color, a bitter taste, and an irritating odor, increased moisture content, electrical conductivity, fatty oil content, and acid value, and decreased water- and alcohol-soluble extract contents and pH value. Among them, the acid value had significant difference (p < 0.01) from 3.90 of normal ZSS to 18.68 mg/g of rancid ZSS. A total of 39 volatile compounds were identified in samples, including 20 in normal ZSS and 38 compounds in rancid ZSS. Nineteen common compounds were identified in normal and rancid samples. Among them, the content of 10 compounds such as δ-limonene, (R,R)-2,3-butanediol, and (R,S)-2,3-butanediol was decreased but that of nine compounds such as acetic acid, n-octanoic acid, and n-nonanoic acid was increased in rancid ZSS. Nineteen unique compounds such as β-phellandrene, α-pinene, and 3-carene were detected and only one compound, δ-cadinene, was not detected in rancid ZSS. In addition, eight short-chain organic acids, acetic, propanoic, butanoic, pentanoic, hexanoic, heptanoic, octanoic, and nonanoic acids, were new products in rancid ZSS, and it was speculated that the production of a series of organic acids might be the material basis of irritating odor after normal ZSS became rancid. This is the first report that a series of short-chain organic acids have been found in a rancid substance. In conclusion, there was a significant difference between normal and rancid ZSS. These indicators could be used as an early warning for judging the rancidity phenomenon of medicinal and edible ZSS. In addition, this is the first comprehensive evaluation about the rancidity process of a medicinal and edible substance.

摘要

为全面评价药用和食用酸枣仁(ZSS,酸枣干燥成熟种子)在储存过程中酸败前后的质量,对其传统感官特性、理化特性和挥发性成分等指标进行了分析。结果表明,与正常样品相比,酸枣仁酸败样品颜色变深、味道变苦、产生刺激性气味,水分含量、电导率、脂肪油含量和酸值增加,水溶性和醇溶性提取物含量及pH值降低。其中,酸值差异显著(p<0.01),正常酸枣仁酸值为3.90,酸败酸枣仁酸值为18.68mg/g。样品中共鉴定出39种挥发性成分,正常酸枣仁中鉴定出20种,酸败酸枣仁中鉴定出38种。正常和酸败样品中鉴定出19种共有成分。其中,酸败酸枣仁中δ-柠檬烯、(R,R)-2,3-丁二醇和(R,S)-2,3-丁二醇等10种成分含量降低,而乙酸、正辛酸和正壬酸等9种成分含量增加。检测到β-水芹烯、α-蒎烯和3-蒈烯等19种特有成分,酸败酸枣仁中仅未检测到δ-杜松烯一种成分。此外,乙酸、丙酸、丁酸、戊酸、己酸、庚酸、辛酸和壬酸8种短链有机酸是酸败酸枣仁中的新产物,推测一系列有机酸的产生可能是正常酸枣仁酸败后产生刺激性气味的物质基础。这是首次报道在酸败物质中发现一系列短链有机酸。综上所述,正常和酸败酸枣仁之间存在显著差异。这些指标可作为判断药用和食用酸枣仁酸败现象的预警。此外,这是首次对药用和食用物质酸败过程进行的综合评价。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/192e/9367921/66ee9ebd9669/foods-11-02320-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/192e/9367921/59a23c1d0b08/foods-11-02320-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/192e/9367921/ac5cb73d4460/foods-11-02320-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/192e/9367921/69385ebf4ed7/foods-11-02320-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/192e/9367921/66ee9ebd9669/foods-11-02320-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/192e/9367921/59a23c1d0b08/foods-11-02320-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/192e/9367921/ac5cb73d4460/foods-11-02320-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/192e/9367921/69385ebf4ed7/foods-11-02320-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/192e/9367921/66ee9ebd9669/foods-11-02320-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Comprehensive Quality Evaluation for Medicinal and Edible Ziziphi Spinosae Semen before and after Rancidity Based on Traditional Sensory, Physicochemical Characteristics, and Volatile Compounds.基于传统感官、理化特性及挥发性成分的酸枣仁酸败前后综合品质评价
Foods. 2022 Aug 3;11(15):2320. doi: 10.3390/foods11152320.
2
[Quality analysis of extracts based on high performance liquid chromatography quantitative fingerprint and ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry quantification].基于高效液相色谱定量指纹图谱和超高效液相色谱-串联质谱定量的提取物质量分析
Se Pu. 2021 Sep;39(9):989-997. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1123.2021.06019.
3
Rapid characterization of Ziziphi Spinosae Semen by UPLC/Qtof MS with novel informatics platform and its application in evaluation of two seeds from Ziziphus species.基于新型信息学平台的超高效液相色谱/四极杆飞行时间质谱法快速表征酸枣仁及其在两种枣属植物种子评价中的应用
J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2016 Apr 15;122:59-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2016.01.047. Epub 2016 Jan 23.
4
Screening of different chemical components of sedative and hypnotic effects of Ziziphi Spinosae Semen before and after frying and determination of the Q-Marker.炮制前后酸枣仁镇静催眠作用的不同化学组分筛选及 Q 标志物研究。
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2022 Sep 1;1207:123349. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2022.123349. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
5
Systematically characterization of in vivo substances of Ziziphi Spinosae Semen in rats by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with quadrupole time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometry analysis.采用超高效液相色谱-四级杆飞行时间串联质谱联用技术分析大鼠体内酸枣仁的体内物质的系统特征。
J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2021 Jan 30;193:113756. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2020.113756. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
6
[Qualitative and semiquantitative analyses of the chemical components of the seed coat and kernel of Ziziphi Spinosae Semen].[酸枣仁种皮与种仁化学成分的定性与半定量分析]
Se Pu. 2024 Mar 8;42(3):234-244. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1123.2023.09015.
7
Ziziphi Spinosae Semen: A Natural Herb Resource for Treating Neurological Disorders.酸枣仁:一种治疗神经紊乱的天然草药资源。
Curr Top Med Chem. 2022;22(17):1379-1391. doi: 10.2174/1568026622666220516113210.
8
Ziziphi Spinosae Semen: An updated review on pharmacological activity, quality control, and application.酸枣仁:在药理活性、质量控制和应用方面的最新研究进展。
J Food Biochem. 2022 Jul;46(7):e14153. doi: 10.1111/jfbc.14153. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
9
E-eye, flash GC E-nose and HS-GC-MS combined with chemometrics to identify the adulterants and geographical origins of Ziziphi Spinosae Semen.采用 E-eye、GC E-nose、HS-GC-MS 联用技术结合化学计量学方法鉴别酸枣仁掺伪及产地。
Food Chem. 2023 Oct 30;424:136270. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.136270. Epub 2023 Apr 29.
10
[Processing of Ziziphi Spinosae Semen: evolution and research progress].[酸枣仁炮制:沿革与研究进展]
Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi. 2022 May;47(10):2572-2583. doi: 10.19540/j.cnki.cjcmm.20211119.601.

引用本文的文献

1
Chemical composition determination and transcriptomic analyses provide insight into the differences between wild and grafted Semen Ziziphi Spinosae.化学成分测定和转录组分析揭示了野生和嫁接酸枣仁之间的差异。
BMC Genomics. 2024 Oct 18;25(1):978. doi: 10.1186/s12864-024-10837-7.
2
Spatial distribution of metabolites in processing Ziziphi Spinosae Semen as revealed by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry imaging.基质辅助激光解吸电离质谱成像技术揭示的酸枣仁炮制过程中代谢物的空间分布。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 3;14(1):15263. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-61500-w.
3
A Comprehensive Quality Analysis of Different Colors of Medicinal and Edible Honeysuckle.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of Amylose-Amylopectin Ratio of Starches on the Mechanical Strength and Stability of Acetylsalicylic Acid Tablets.淀粉直链淀粉-支链淀粉比例对乙酰水杨酸片剂机械强度和稳定性的影响。
AAPS PharmSciTech. 2022 Apr 20;23(5):118. doi: 10.1208/s12249-022-02266-0.
2
Ziziphi Spinosae Semen: An updated review on pharmacological activity, quality control, and application.酸枣仁:在药理活性、质量控制和应用方面的最新研究进展。
J Food Biochem. 2022 Jul;46(7):e14153. doi: 10.1111/jfbc.14153. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
3
Superiority of Mesoporous Silica-Based Amorphous Formulations over Spray-Dried Solid Dispersions.
不同颜色药食两用金银花的综合品质分析
Foods. 2023 Aug 20;12(16):3126. doi: 10.3390/foods12163126.
4
Evaluation and Optimization of Quality Based on the Physicochemical Characteristics and Metabolites Changes of Qingpi during Storage.基于青皮贮藏期间理化特性及代谢产物变化的质量评价与优化
Foods. 2023 Jan 19;12(3):463. doi: 10.3390/foods12030463.
基于介孔二氧化硅的无定形制剂相对于喷雾干燥固体分散体的优越性。
Pharmaceutics. 2022 Feb 16;14(2):428. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14020428.
4
Pecan color change during storage: Kinetics and Modeling of the Processes.山核桃在储存过程中的颜色变化:过程的动力学与建模
Curr Res Food Sci. 2022 Jan 21;5:261-271. doi: 10.1016/j.crfs.2022.01.015. eCollection 2022.
5
Conversion of Food Waste into 2,3-Butanediol via Thermophilic Fermentation: Effects of Carbohydrate Content and Nutrient Supplementation.通过嗜热发酵将食物垃圾转化为2,3-丁二醇:碳水化合物含量和营养补充的影响
Foods. 2022 Jan 10;11(2):169. doi: 10.3390/foods11020169.
6
Elicitation of ()-2-Hexenal and 2,3-Butanediol on the Bioactive Compounds in Adventitious Roots of var. .诱导香茅醛和 2,3-丁二醇在 var. 的不定根中的生物活性化合物的产生。
J Agric Food Chem. 2022 Jan 19;70(2):470-479. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.1c05813. Epub 2022 Jan 5.
7
Changes of Volatile Flavor Compounds in Large Yellow Croaker () during Storage, as Evaluated by Headspace Gas Chromatography-Ion Mobility Spectrometry and Principal Component Analysis.基于顶空气相色谱-离子迁移谱和主成分分析评估大黄鱼在储存期间挥发性风味化合物的变化
Foods. 2021 Nov 25;10(12):2917. doi: 10.3390/foods10122917.
8
Effect of Drying Methods on Peanut Quality during Storage.干燥方法对储存过程中花生质量的影响。
J Oleo Sci. 2022 Jan 8;71(1):57-66. doi: 10.5650/jos.ess21146. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
9
Effect of the Manufacturing Process on the Microbiota, Organoleptic Properties and Volatilome of Three Salmon-Based Products.制造工艺对三种三文鱼制品的微生物群、感官特性和挥发物的影响
Foods. 2021 Oct 20;10(11):2517. doi: 10.3390/foods10112517.
10
Quality and volatile compound analysis of shrimp heads during different temperature storage.不同温度储存条件下虾头的品质及挥发性成分分析
Food Chem X. 2021 Nov 9;12:100156. doi: 10.1016/j.fochx.2021.100156. eCollection 2021 Dec 30.