Garant Aurelie, Vasilevsky Carol-Ann, Boutros Marylise, Khosrow-Khavar Farzin, Kavan Petr, Diec Hugo, Des Groseilliers Sylvain, Faria Julio, Ferland Emery, Pelsser Vincent, Martin André-Guy, Devic Slobodan, Vuong Te
Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.
Department of Surgery, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3T1E2, Canada.
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jul 28;14(15):3665. doi: 10.3390/cancers14153665.
We explored image-guided adaptive endorectal brachytherapy patients electing non-operative management for rectal cancer. We present the first pre-planned interim analysis.
In this open-label phase II-III randomized study, patients with operable cT2-3ab N0 M0 rectal cancer received 45 Gy in 25 fractions of pelvic external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with 5-FU/Capecitabine. They were randomized 1:1 to receive either an EBRT boost of 9 Gy in 5 fractions (Arm A) or three weekly adaptive brachytherapy (IGAEBT) boosts totaling 30 Gy (Arm B). Patient characteristics and toxicity are presented using descriptive analyses; TME-free survival between arms with the intention to treat the population is explored using the Kaplan-Meier method.
A total of 40 patients were in this analysis. Baseline characteristics were balanced; acute toxicities were similar. Complete clinical response (cCR) was 50% ( = 10/20) in Arm A and 90% in Arm B ( = 18/20). Median follow-up was 1.3 years; 2-year TME-free survival was 38.6% (95% CI: 16.5-60.6%) in the EBRT arm and 76.6% (95% CI: 56.1-97.1%) in the IGAEBT arm.
Radiation intensification with IGAEBT is feasible. This interim analysis suggests an improvement in TME-free survival when comparing IGAEBT with EBRT, pending confirmation upon completion of this trial.
我们对选择非手术治疗直肠癌的图像引导自适应直肠内近距离放射治疗患者进行了研究。我们展示了首次预先计划的中期分析。
在这项开放标签的II-III期随机研究中,可手术的cT2-3ab N0 M0直肠癌患者接受了盆腔外照射放疗(EBRT)45 Gy,分25次,同时使用5-氟尿嘧啶/卡培他滨。他们被1:1随机分组,分别接受5次分割共9 Gy的EBRT增敏(A组)或每周3次共30 Gy的自适应近距离放射治疗(IGAEBT)增敏(B组)。使用描述性分析呈现患者特征和毒性;采用Kaplan-Meier方法探索意向性治疗人群中两组间的无全直肠系膜切除(TME)生存情况。
本分析共有40例患者。基线特征均衡;急性毒性相似。A组的完全临床缓解(cCR)率为50%( = 10/20),B组为90%( = 18/20)。中位随访时间为1.3年;EBRT组的2年无TME生存率为38.6%(95% CI:16.5 - 60.6%),IGAEBT组为76.6%(95% CI:56.1 - 97.1%)。
IGAEBT强化放疗是可行的。这项中期分析表明,将IGAEBT与EBRT相比,无TME生存率有所提高,有待本试验完成后进行确认。