Department of Surgery, Colorectal Surgery Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
Department of Surgery, Colorectal Surgery Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA; Department of Surgery, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Ann Oncol. 2024 Nov;35(11):1003-1014. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2024.07.729. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
Potential differences in organ preservation between total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) regimens integrating long-course chemoradiotherapy (LCCRT) and short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) in rectal cancer remain undefined.
This natural experiment arose from a policy change in response to the COVID-19 pandemic during which our institution switched from uniformly treating patients with LCCRT to mandating that all patients be treated with SCRT. Our study includes 323 locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma patients treated with LCCRT-based or SCRT-based TNT from January 2018 to January 2021. Patients who achieved clinical complete response were offered organ preservation with watch-and-wait (WW) management. The primary outcome was 2-year organ preservation. Additional outcomes included local regrowth, distant recurrence, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS).
Patient and tumor characteristics were similar between LCCRT (n = 247) and SCRT (n = 76) cohorts. Median follow-up was 31 months. Similar clinical complete response rates were observed following LCCRT and SCRT (44.5% versus 43.4%). Two-year organ preservation was 40% [95% confidence interval (CI) 34% to 46%] and 31% (95% CI 22% to 44%) among all patients treated with LCCRT and SCRT, respectively. In patients managed with WW, LCCRT resulted in higher 2-year organ preservation (89% LCCRT, 95% CI 83% to 95% versus 70% SCRT, 95% CI 55% to 90%; P = 0.005) and lower 2-year local regrowth (19% LCCRT, 95% CI 11% to 26% versus 36% SCRT, 95% CI 16% to 52%; P = 0.072) compared with SCRT. The 2-year distant recurrence (10% versus 6%), DFS (90% versus 90%), and OS (99% versus 100%) were similar between WW patients treated with LCCRT and SCRT, respectively.
While WW eligibility was similar between cohorts, WW patients treated with LCCRT had higher 2-year organ preservation and lower local regrowth than those treated with SCRT, yet similar DFS and OS. These data support induction LCCRT followed by consolidation chemotherapy as the preferred TNT regimen for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer pursuing organ preservation.
在直肠癌中,整合长程放化疗(LCCRT)和短程放疗(SCRT)的全新辅助治疗(TNT)方案在器官保存方面的潜在差异仍未确定。
本自然实验源于一项应对 COVID-19 大流行的政策变化,在此期间,我们的机构从统一为患者提供 LCCRT 治疗改为要求所有患者接受 SCRT 治疗。我们的研究纳入了 2018 年 1 月至 2021 年 1 月期间接受 LCCRT 或 SCRT 为基础的 TNT 治疗的 323 例局部晚期直肠腺癌患者。临床完全缓解的患者可选择采用观察等待(WW)管理以实现器官保存。主要结局是 2 年的器官保存率。其他结局包括局部复发、远处复发、无病生存(DFS)和总生存(OS)。
LCCRT 组(n=247)和 SCRT 组(n=76)患者的特征和肿瘤特征相似。中位随访时间为 31 个月。LCCRT 和 SCRT 后观察到相似的临床完全缓解率(44.5% 比 43.4%)。所有接受 LCCRT 和 SCRT 治疗的患者中,2 年的器官保存率分别为 40%[95%置信区间(CI)为 34%至 46%]和 31%(95%CI 为 22%至 44%)。在接受 WW 治疗的患者中,LCCRT 导致 2 年的器官保存率更高(89%LCCRT,95%CI 为 83%至 95%比 70%SCRT,95%CI 为 55%至 90%;P=0.005),局部复发率更低(19%LCCRT,95%CI 为 11%至 26%比 36%SCRT,95%CI 为 16%至 52%;P=0.072)。与 SCRT 相比,WW 患者的 2 年远处复发率(10%比 6%)、DFS(90%比 90%)和 OS(99%比 100%)相似。
虽然 WW 纳入标准在两组间相似,但 LCCRT 组的 WW 患者 2 年的器官保存率更高,局部复发率更低,而 DFS 和 OS 相似。这些数据支持在诱导性 LCCRT 后行巩固化疗作为局部晚期直肠癌患者追求器官保存的首选 TNT 方案。