Roh Young Hak, Park Seong Gyun, Lee Seung Hyun
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ewha Womans University Medical Center, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, 1071 Anyangcheon-ro, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul 07985, Republic of Korea.
J Pers Med. 2023 Oct 27;13(11):1543. doi: 10.3390/jpm13111543.
Distal radius fractures are the most prevalent upper extremity fractures, posing a significant public health concern. Recent studies comparing regional and general anesthesia for postoperative pain management after these fractures have yielded conflicting results. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the effectiveness of regional and general anesthesia concerning postoperative pain management and opioid consumption following distal radius fracture surgery. A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE databases to identify relevant randomized controlled trials. Four randomized trials involving 248 participants were included in the analysis. A pooled analysis revealed that regional anesthesia led to significantly reduced postoperative pain scores at 2 h compared to general anesthesia (SMD -2.03; 95% CI -2.88--1.17). However, no significant differences in pain scores were observed between the two anesthesia types after 12 h post-surgery. Regional anesthesia was associated with lower total opioid consumption (SMD -0.76; 95% CI -1.25--0.26) and fewer occurrences of nausea and vomiting compared to the general anesthesia. Nonetheless, opioid consumption on the first day post-discharge was significantly higher in the regional anesthesia group (SMD 0.83; 95% CI 0.47-1.20). The analgesic superiority of regional anesthesia is confined to the early postoperative hours with overall lower opioid use but a notable increase in opioid consumption on the first day post-discharge, potentially attributable to rebound pain.
桡骨远端骨折是最常见的上肢骨折,引起了重大的公共卫生问题。最近关于这些骨折术后疼痛管理的区域麻醉和全身麻醉的比较研究得出了相互矛盾的结果。这项荟萃分析旨在比较区域麻醉和全身麻醉在桡骨远端骨折手术后疼痛管理和阿片类药物消耗方面的有效性。在PubMed、Cochrane图书馆和EMBASE数据库中进行了全面检索,以识别相关的随机对照试验。分析纳入了四项涉及248名参与者的随机试验。汇总分析显示,与全身麻醉相比,区域麻醉在术后2小时导致术后疼痛评分显著降低(标准化均数差 -2.03;95%置信区间 -2.88--1.17)。然而,术后12小时后,两种麻醉类型之间的疼痛评分没有观察到显著差异。与全身麻醉相比,区域麻醉与较低的阿片类药物总消耗量(标准化均数差 -0.76;95%置信区间 -1.25--0.26)和较少的恶心和呕吐发生率相关。尽管如此,区域麻醉组出院后第一天的阿片类药物消耗量显著更高(标准化均数差 0.83;95%置信区间 0.47-1.20)。区域麻醉的镇痛优势仅限于术后早期,总体阿片类药物使用量较低,但出院后第一天阿片类药物消耗量显著增加,这可能归因于反弹痛。