Department of Developmental and Socialization Psychology, University of Padova, Via Venezia 8, 35121 Padova, Italy.
Digital Health Lab, Centre for Digital Health and Wellbeing, Fondazione Bruno Kessler, Via Sommarive 18, 38123 Trento, Italy.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 3;19(15):9549. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159549.
The present meta-analysis investigated the overall and differential efficacy of digital cognitive-behavioral therapies (CBTs) vs. third-generation CBTs deployed to pregnant women in reducing sub-clinical depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms while fostering sleep quality and quality of life. A PRISMA-guided systematic search was used, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the above-mentioned interventions. Data were pooled using either the mean difference (MD) or standardized MD (SMD). Sub-group analyses were carried out when appropriate. The primary outcomes were depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms, as well as sleep quality and quality of life. The interventions' acceptability was evaluated through the odds ratio (OR) of drop-out rates. Seven RCTs were included, comprising 1873 pregnant women. The results showed the interventions' efficacy in terms of reducing depression symptoms (SMD = -0.36, CI = 0.61, -0.11, k = 9) at the endpoint, although it was not maintained at follow-up during the postpartum period. The interventions' efficacy in terms of reducing anxiety symptoms (SMD = 1.96, CI = -2.72, -1.21, k = 3) at the endpoint was also significant, while having no effect on sleep quality. The interventions were well accepted (OR = 1.68; 95% CI = 0.84, 3.35; k = 7). Although no sound conclusions can be drawn concerning the joint or differential efficacy of the considered interventions, this study was useful in highlighting the need to develop evidence-based digital prevention programs for pregnant women with sub-clinical symptoms.
本荟萃分析调查了数字认知行为疗法(CBT)与第三代 CBT 整体及差异疗效,这些疗法用于减少孕妇亚临床抑郁、焦虑和压力症状,同时促进睡眠质量和生活质量。采用 PRISMA 指南进行系统搜索,包括评估上述干预措施的随机对照试验(RCT)。使用均数差(MD)或标准化 MD(SMD)进行数据合并。在适当情况下进行亚组分析。主要结局是抑郁、焦虑和压力症状,以及睡眠质量和生活质量。通过退出率的比值比(OR)评估干预措施的可接受性。纳入了 7 项 RCT,共纳入 1873 名孕妇。结果表明,干预措施在终点时减少抑郁症状方面具有疗效(SMD = -0.36,CI = 0.61,-0.11,k = 9),但在产后期间的随访中并未维持。干预措施在减少焦虑症状方面的疗效(SMD = 1.96,CI = -2.72,-1.21,k = 3)也具有显著意义,但对睡眠质量没有影响。干预措施的接受度较高(OR = 1.68;95%CI = 0.84,3.35;k = 7)。尽管不能对考虑中的干预措施的联合或差异疗效得出确凿结论,但本研究有助于强调需要为有亚临床症状的孕妇开发基于证据的数字预防计划。