Naranjo-Cinto Fermin, Cerón-Cordero Adriana-Imelda, Figueroa-Padilla Claudia, Galindo-Paz Dulce, Fernández-Carnero Samuel, Gallego-Izquierdo Tomás, Nuñez-Nagy Susana, Pecos-Martín Daniel
Universidad de Alcalá, Facultad de Enfermería y Fisioterapia, Departamento de Fisioterapia, Grupo de Investigación en Fisioterapia y Dolor, 28801 Alcalá de Henares, Spain.
Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Facultad de Medicina Licenciatura en Fisioterapia, Puebla 72000, Mexico.
J Clin Med. 2022 Jul 28;11(15):4395. doi: 10.3390/jcm11154395.
The aim of this study was to evaluate if manual therapy added to a therapeutic exercise program produced greater improvements than a sham manual therapy added to same exercise program in patients with non-specific shoulder pain. This was an evaluator-blinded randomized controlled trial. Forty-five subjects were randomly allocated into one of three groups: manual therapy (glenohumeral mobilization technique and rib-cage technique); thoracic sham manual therapy (glenohumeral mobilization technique and rib-cage sham technique); or sham manual therapy (sham glenohumeral mobilization technique and rib-cage sham technique). All groups also received a therapeutic exercise program. Pain intensity, disability and pain-free active shoulder range of motion were measured post treatment and at 4-week and 12-week follow-ups. Mixed-model analyses of variance and post hoc pairwise comparisons with Bonferroni corrections were constructed for the analysis of the outcome measures. All groups reported improved pain intensity, disability and pain-free active shoulder range of motion. However, there were no between-group differences in these outcome measures. The addition of the manual therapy techniques applied in the present study to a therapeutic exercise protocol did not seem to add benefits to the management of subjects with non-specific shoulder pain.
本研究的目的是评估在非特异性肩部疼痛患者中,在治疗性运动方案基础上增加手法治疗是否比在相同运动方案基础上增加假手法治疗能带来更大改善。这是一项评估者盲法随机对照试验。45名受试者被随机分配到三组中的一组:手法治疗组(盂肱关节松动技术和胸廓技术);胸椎假手法治疗组(盂肱关节松动技术和胸廓假技术);或假手法治疗组(假盂肱关节松动技术和胸廓假技术)。所有组均接受治疗性运动方案。在治疗后以及4周和12周随访时测量疼痛强度、功能障碍和无痛主动肩部活动范围。构建方差混合模型分析以及采用Bonferroni校正的事后两两比较,以分析结果指标。所有组的疼痛强度、功能障碍和无痛主动肩部活动范围均有改善。然而,这些结果指标在组间并无差异。在本研究中应用的手法治疗技术添加到治疗性运动方案中,似乎并未给非特异性肩部疼痛患者的管理带来更多益处。