• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

灌溉制度和施氮量作为藜麦产量的影响因素以提高水分和氮素利用效率

Irrigation Regimes and Nitrogen Rates as the Contributing Factors in Quinoa Yield to Increase Water and Nitrogen Efficiencies.

作者信息

Bahrami Maryam, Talebnejad Rezvan, Sepaskhah Ali Reza, Bazile Didier

机构信息

Water Engineering Department, Shiraz University, Shiraz 7144113131, Iran.

Drought Research Center, Shiraz University, Shiraz 7144113131, Iran.

出版信息

Plants (Basel). 2022 Aug 5;11(15):2048. doi: 10.3390/plants11152048.

DOI:10.3390/plants11152048
PMID:35956526
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9370644/
Abstract

Sustainable field crop management has been considered to reach the food security issue due to global warming and water scarcity. The effect of deficit irrigation and nitrogen rates on quinoa yield is a challenging issue in those areas. In this regard, the interaction effects of different N rates (0, 125, 250, and 375 kg N ha) and irrigation regimes [full irrigation (FI) and deficit irrigation at 0.75 FI and 0.5 FI] on quinoa yield and water and nitrogen efficiencies were evaluated with a two-year field experiment. Increasing nitrogen fertilizer application levels from 250 to 375 kg N ha under FI and deficit irrigation did not cause a significant difference in seed yield and the total dry matter of quinoa. Furthermore, 20% and 34% reductions were observed for nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) and nitrogen yield efficiency with the application of 375 kg N ha compared with that obtained in 250 kg N ha nitrogen fertilizer, respectively. Therefore, a Nitrogen application rate of 250 kg ha and applying 0.75 FI is suggested as the optimum rate to reach the highest seed water use efficiency (0.7 kg m) and NUE (0.28 kg m) to gain 4.12 Mg ha quinoa seed yield. Under non-limited water resource conditions, an FI and N application rate of 375 kg ha could be used for higher seed yield; however, under water-deficit regimes, an N application rate of 250 kg ha could be adequate. However, questions about which environmental factors impressively restricted the quinoa growth for optimizing the potential yield need further investigation.

摘要

由于全球变暖和水资源短缺,可持续的大田作物管理被认为是解决粮食安全问题的途径。在这些地区,亏缺灌溉和施氮量对藜麦产量的影响是一个具有挑战性的问题。在这方面,通过为期两年的田间试验,评估了不同施氮量(0、125、250和375千克氮/公顷)和灌溉制度[充分灌溉(FI)以及0.75 FI和0.5 FI的亏缺灌溉]对藜麦产量、水分和氮素利用效率的交互作用。在充分灌溉和亏缺灌溉条件下,将氮肥施用量从250千克氮/公顷增加到375千克氮/公顷,藜麦的种子产量和总干物质没有显著差异。此外,与250千克氮/公顷的氮肥施用量相比,施用375千克氮/公顷时,氮素利用效率(NUE)和氮素产量效率分别降低了20%和34%。因此,建议施氮量为250千克/公顷并采用0.75 FI作为最佳施氮量,以达到最高的种子水分利用效率(0.7千克/立方米)和氮素利用效率(0.28千克/立方米),从而获得4.12吨/公顷的藜麦种子产量。在水资源不受限制的条件下,充分灌溉和375千克/公顷的施氮量可用于获得更高的种子产量;然而,在缺水条件下,250千克/公顷的施氮量可能就足够了。然而,关于哪些环境因素对藜麦生长产生显著限制以优化潜在产量的问题,还需要进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd66/9370644/b5cc424ad680/plants-11-02048-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd66/9370644/de0826690fea/plants-11-02048-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd66/9370644/8f8da30b0089/plants-11-02048-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd66/9370644/dd03f85d24e7/plants-11-02048-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd66/9370644/7241e9e92124/plants-11-02048-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd66/9370644/b3f40062b7b4/plants-11-02048-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd66/9370644/b5cc424ad680/plants-11-02048-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd66/9370644/de0826690fea/plants-11-02048-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd66/9370644/8f8da30b0089/plants-11-02048-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd66/9370644/dd03f85d24e7/plants-11-02048-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd66/9370644/7241e9e92124/plants-11-02048-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd66/9370644/b3f40062b7b4/plants-11-02048-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd66/9370644/b5cc424ad680/plants-11-02048-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Irrigation Regimes and Nitrogen Rates as the Contributing Factors in Quinoa Yield to Increase Water and Nitrogen Efficiencies.灌溉制度和施氮量作为藜麦产量的影响因素以提高水分和氮素利用效率
Plants (Basel). 2022 Aug 5;11(15):2048. doi: 10.3390/plants11152048.
2
Optimizing irrigation and nitrogen application strategies to improve sunflower yield and resource use efficiency in a cold and arid oasis region of Northwest China.优化灌溉与施氮策略以提高中国西北寒冷干旱绿洲地区向日葵产量及资源利用效率
Front Plant Sci. 2024 Aug 30;15:1429548. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1429548. eCollection 2024.
3
How Does Quinoa ( Willd.) Respond to Phosphorus Fertilization and Irrigation Water Salinity?藜麦(藜麦属)如何响应磷肥施用和灌溉水盐分?
Plants (Basel). 2022 Jan 14;11(2):216. doi: 10.3390/plants11020216.
4
Effects of irrigation and nitrogen application on soil water and nitrogen distribution and water-nitrogen utilization of wolfberry in the Yellow River Irrigation Region of Gansu Province, China.灌溉与施氮对甘肃省黄河灌区枸杞土壤水氮分布及水氮利用的影响
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Dec 11;14:1309219. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1309219. eCollection 2023.
5
Sensor-based precision nutrient and irrigation management enhances the physiological performance, water productivity, and yield of soybean under system of crop intensification.基于传感器的精准养分与灌溉管理提升了作物集约化系统下大豆的生理性能、水分利用效率及产量。
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Dec 18;14:1282217. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1282217. eCollection 2023.
6
Investigation of the regulatory effects of water and nitrogen supply on nitrogen transport and distribution in wolfberry fields.水分和氮素供应对枸杞园氮素运输与分配调控效应的研究
Front Plant Sci. 2024 Apr 17;15:1385980. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1385980. eCollection 2024.
7
Root Growth, Water and Nitrogen Use Efficiencies in Winter Wheat Under Different Irrigation and Nitrogen Regimes in North China Plain.华北平原不同灌溉与施氮模式下冬小麦的根系生长、水分利用效率和氮素利用效率
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Dec 5;9:1798. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01798. eCollection 2018.
8
Effects of supplemental irrigation on grain yield and water and nitrogen efficiencies of winter wheat in the North China Plain.补充灌溉对华北平原冬小麦籽粒产量及水分和氮素利用效率的影响
J Sci Food Agric. 2023 Dec;103(15):7484-7493. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.12830. Epub 2023 Jul 21.
9
Quinoa ( Wild.) Seed Yield and Efficiency in Soils Deficient of Nitrogen in the Bolivian Altiplano: An Analytical Review.藜麦(野生)在玻利维亚高原缺氮土壤中的种子产量及效率:分析综述
Plants (Basel). 2021 Nov 16;10(11):2479. doi: 10.3390/plants10112479.
10
[Regulation effects of irrigation methods and nitrogen application on soil water, nitrate, and wheat growth and development].灌溉方式与施氮对土壤水分、硝态氮及小麦生长发育的调控效应
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2019 Apr;30(4):1161-1169. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201904.034.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimizing crop management strategies for improved yield, water productivity, and sustainability of quinoa in shallow basaltic semi-arid regions.优化作物管理策略以提高浅玄武岩半干旱地区藜麦的产量、水分生产率和可持续性。
Front Plant Sci. 2025 Mar 10;16:1522995. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1522995. eCollection 2025.
2
Physiological traits, crop growth, and grain quality of quinoa in response to deficit irrigation and planting methods.水分亏缺和种植方式对藜麦生理特性、生长和籽粒品质的影响。
BMC Plant Biol. 2024 Aug 28;24(1):809. doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-05523-5.
3
Precise partial root-zone irrigation technique and potassium-zinc fertigation management improve maize physio-biochemical responses, yield, and water use in arid climate.

本文引用的文献

1
Quinoa Phenotyping Methodologies: An International Consensus.藜麦表型分析方法:国际共识
Plants (Basel). 2021 Aug 24;10(9):1759. doi: 10.3390/plants10091759.
2
Agronomic Practices and Performances of Quinoa under Field Conditions: A Systematic Review.田间条件下藜麦的农艺实践与表现:一项系统综述
Plants (Basel). 2020 Dec 31;10(1):72. doi: 10.3390/plants10010072.
3
Worldwide Evaluations of Quinoa: Preliminary Results from Post International Year of Quinoa FAO Projects in Nine Countries.藜麦的全球评估:国际藜麦年后粮农组织在九个国家开展的项目的初步成果
精准局部根区灌溉技术和钾锌水肥一体化管理提高干旱气候下玉米的生理生化响应、产量和水分利用。
BMC Plant Biol. 2024 Aug 15;24(1):775. doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-05467-w.
4
Worldwide Evaluations of Quinoa-Biodiversity and Food Security under Climate Change Pressures: Advances and Perspectives.气候变化压力下藜麦生物多样性与粮食安全的全球评估:进展与展望
Plants (Basel). 2023 Feb 15;12(4):868. doi: 10.3390/plants12040868.
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Jun 21;7:850. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00850. eCollection 2016.
4
Quinoa for Marginal Environments: Toward Future Food and Nutritional Security in MENA and Central Asia Regions.适用于边缘环境的藜麦:迈向中东和中亚地区未来的粮食与营养安全
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Mar 29;7:346. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00346. eCollection 2016.
5
Assessment of the nutritional composition of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.).藜麦(Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)营养成分评估。
Food Chem. 2016 Feb 15;193:47-54. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.02.111. Epub 2015 Feb 28.
6
Variation in salinity tolerance of four lowland genotypes of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) as assessed by growth, physiological traits, and sodium transporter gene expression.四种藜麦(Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)低地基因型耐盐性的变化,通过生长、生理特性和钠离子转运基因表达来评估。
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2011 Nov;49(11):1333-41. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2011.08.005. Epub 2011 Aug 23.
7
Mechanisms and control of nutrient uptake in plants.植物养分吸收的机制与调控
Int Rev Cytol. 2003;229:73-114. doi: 10.1016/s0074-7696(03)29003-3.