Suppr超能文献

晚期乳腺癌中阿霉素每周给药与VAC方案的对比:一项随机试验

Weekly adriamycin versus VAC in advanced breast cancer. A randomized trial.

作者信息

Gundersen S, Kvinnsland S, Klepp O, Kvaløy S, Lund E, Høst H

出版信息

Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1986 Dec;22(12):1431-4. doi: 10.1016/0277-5379(86)90075-1.

Abstract

In a prospective randomised study 128 patients with advanced breast cancer were treated either with Adriamycin (20 mg/week) or vincristine, Adriamycin and cyclophosphamide (VAC). An objective response was obtained in 31 and 35% of patients in the two groups. There was no significant difference with regard to duration of response or survival. Weekly low dose Adriamycin was well tolerated. When subjective side effects occurred, they were usually slight and transient. In approx. 40% of the patients no side-effects at all were observed. Eight per cent had alopecia requiring a wig. Only slight myelosuppression could be seen in a few patients and this had no practical implications. Most or all of VAC patients experienced severe toxicity with regard to nausea, vomiting and alopecia. Also myelosuppression was more pronounced among VAC patients. It is concluded that weekly doses of Adriamycin as single agent therapy for advanced breast cancer is as effective as the VAC combination delivered every third week, with considerably less toxicity.

摘要

在一项前瞻性随机研究中,128例晚期乳腺癌患者接受了阿霉素(20毫克/周)或长春新碱、阿霉素和环磷酰胺(VAC)治疗。两组患者的客观缓解率分别为31%和35%。在缓解持续时间或生存率方面无显著差异。每周低剂量阿霉素耐受性良好。出现主观副作用时,通常轻微且短暂。约40%的患者未观察到任何副作用。8%的患者出现需要假发的脱发。少数患者仅出现轻微骨髓抑制,且无实际影响。大多数或所有VAC方案治疗的患者在恶心、呕吐和脱发方面出现严重毒性。VAC方案治疗的患者骨髓抑制也更明显。得出的结论是,每周剂量的阿霉素作为晚期乳腺癌的单药治疗与每三周给予一次的VAC联合方案效果相同,但毒性明显更低。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验