Wils J A, Bron H, Van Lange L, Pannebakker M, Romme A, Scheerder H, Smeets J B, Beex L V
Cancer. 1985 Sep 15;56(6):1325-31. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19850915)56:6<1325::aid-cncr2820560618>3.0.co;2-9.
A prospective multicenter trial was conducted in 155 consecutive patients with Stage IV breast cancer randomly allocated to receive either (1) vincristin (V) 1.2 mg/m2 (maximum dose, 2 mg), Adriamycin (A) (doxorubicin) 40 mg/m2, and cyclophosphamide (C) 500 mg/m2, all intravenously on day 1, every 4 weeks, in combination with medroxyprogesteron acetate (MPA) 600 mg orally on days 1 through 14, 500 mg intramuscularly on days 1 through 28, and twice weekly afterwards (combined chemoendocrine approach) or (2) the same combination chemotherapy (VAC) for three cycles alternating with MPA in the above-mentioned dosage during 8 weeks (alternating chemoendocrine approach). Results show an overall response rate of 73% with 26% complete responses in the combined treatment arm, whereas in the alternating arm, an overall response rate of 76% with 20% complete responses was observed. In patients with more than one metastatic site, response rate was higher in the combination treatment, and only in this arm were complete responses observed in these patients. Although the median duration of response was long in both treatment arms (combination, 19 months versus alternating, 21 months), the median overall survival in both groups was not definitely prolonged (22 versus 24 months, respectively). However, results in subsets of patients suggest that the alternating chemoendocrine approach may be better for estrogen receptor (ER)-negative patients, for patients younger than 51 years of age, and for patients with a disease-free interval of 1 year or less. Patients with these parameters probably belong to the same population. It is concluded that combination of chemotherapy and high-dose MPA may be indicated in ER-positive patients when a clinical response is urgently needed. In ER-negative patients, the alternating use of both treatment modalities deserves further investigation.
一项前瞻性多中心试验纳入了155例连续的IV期乳腺癌患者,这些患者被随机分配接受以下两种治疗方案之一:(1)长春新碱(V)1.2mg/m²(最大剂量2mg)、阿霉素(A)(多柔比星)40mg/m²和环磷酰胺(C)500mg/m²,均于第1天静脉给药,每4周一次,同时联合醋酸甲羟孕酮(MPA),第1至14天口服600mg,第1至28天肌肉注射500mg,之后每周两次(联合化疗内分泌方法);或(2)相同的联合化疗方案(VAC),共三个周期,与上述剂量的MPA在8周内交替使用(交替化疗内分泌方法)。结果显示,联合治疗组的总缓解率为73%,完全缓解率为26%;而在交替治疗组,总缓解率为76%,完全缓解率为20%。在有多个转移部位的患者中,联合治疗组的缓解率更高,且只有在该组中观察到这些患者出现完全缓解。尽管两个治疗组的中位缓解持续时间都较长(联合治疗组为19个月,交替治疗组为21个月),但两组的中位总生存期均未明确延长(分别为22个月和24个月)。然而,亚组患者的结果表明,交替化疗内分泌方法可能对雌激素受体(ER)阴性的患者、年龄小于51岁的患者以及无病生存期为1年或更短的患者更好。具有这些参数的患者可能属于同一人群。结论是,当急需临床缓解时,ER阳性患者可能适合化疗与大剂量MPA联合使用。对于ER阴性患者,两种治疗方式的交替使用值得进一步研究。