College of Computer Science and Electronic Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China.
Faculty of Mathematics and Informatics, Dalat University, Dalat 66100, Vietnam.
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Jul 30;22(15):5709. doi: 10.3390/s22155709.
In recent years, due to the ubiquitous presence of WiFi access points in buildings, the WiFi fingerprinting method has become one of the most promising approaches for indoor positioning applications. However, the performance of this method is vulnerable to changes in indoor environments. To tackle this challenge, in this paper, we propose a novel WiFi fingerprinting method that uses the valued tolerance rough set theory-based classification method. In the offline phase, the conventional received signal strength (RSS) fingerprinting database is converted into a decision table. Then a new fingerprinting database with decision rules is constructed based on the decision table, which includes the credibility degrees and the support object set values for all decision rules. In the online phase, various classification levels are applied to find out the best match between the RSS values in the decision rules database and the measured RSS values at the unknown position. The experimental results compared the performance of the proposed method with those of the nearest-neighbor-based and the random statistical methods in two different test cases. The results show that the proposed method greatly outperforms the others in both cases, where it achieves high accuracy with 98.05% of right position classification, which is approximately 50.49% more accurate than the others. The mean positioning errors at wrong estimated positions for the two test cases are 1.71 m and 1.99 m, using the proposed method.
近年来,由于建筑物中无处不在的 WiFi 接入点,WiFi 指纹识别方法已成为室内定位应用中最有前途的方法之一。然而,该方法的性能容易受到室内环境变化的影响。针对这一挑战,本文提出了一种新颖的 WiFi 指纹识别方法,该方法使用基于值容差粗糙集理论的分类方法。在离线阶段,将传统的接收信号强度 (RSS) 指纹识别数据库转换为决策表。然后,基于决策表构建一个包含所有决策规则可信度和支持对象集值的新指纹识别数据库。在线阶段,应用各种分类级别来找出决策规则数据库中的 RSS 值与未知位置处测量的 RSS 值之间的最佳匹配。实验结果将所提出方法的性能与基于最近邻的方法和随机统计方法在两个不同的测试案例中的性能进行了比较。结果表明,在所提出的方法在两种情况下都大大优于其他方法,在两种情况下都实现了 98.05%的正确位置分类准确率,比其他方法大约高 50.49%。对于两个测试案例,错误估计位置的平均定位误差分别为 1.71 米和 1.99 米,使用所提出的方法。