• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高层管理团队特征与中国税收筹划关系:模糊集定性比较分析的结果

Characteristics of top management team and Chinese tax planning nexus: Findings from a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis.

作者信息

Jiang Haiming, Kim Eunyoung

机构信息

School of Knowledge Science, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Nomi, Japan.

School of Management, Dalian Polytechnic University, Dalian, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 25;13:964278. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.964278. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.964278
PMID:35959079
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9358246/
Abstract

A top management team (TMT) has been identified as one of the key factors driving changes in tax planning strategy. Based on upper echelons theory, this study investigates whether configurations of TMT characteristics influence enterprise tax planning strategy by using the fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA). Using a panel data of China public companies, we found three configurations conducive to aggressive tax planning and two combinations conducive to low tax planning. Specifically, the level of education, tenure, age, career experience, and size of the top management team affect a firm's propensity to engage in tax planning. Further, the results show that top management teams are not alike and highlight the differences in how these characteristics combine to impact tax planning.

摘要

高层管理团队(TMT)已被确定为推动税收筹划战略变革的关键因素之一。基于高层梯队理论,本研究运用模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA)来探究高层管理团队特征的配置是否会影响企业税收筹划战略。利用中国上市公司的面板数据,我们发现了三种有利于激进税收筹划的配置和两种有利于低税收筹划的组合。具体而言,高层管理团队的教育水平、任期、年龄、职业经历和规模会影响公司进行税收筹划的倾向。此外,结果表明高层管理团队并非千篇一律,并突出了这些特征如何相互结合以影响税收筹划的差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e2c1/9358246/9a9b1769639a/fpsyg-13-964278-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e2c1/9358246/9a9b1769639a/fpsyg-13-964278-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e2c1/9358246/9a9b1769639a/fpsyg-13-964278-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Characteristics of top management team and Chinese tax planning nexus: Findings from a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis.高层管理团队特征与中国税收筹划关系:模糊集定性比较分析的结果
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 25;13:964278. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.964278. eCollection 2022.
2
Effects of Top Management Team Characteristics on Patent Strategic Change and Firm Performance.高层管理团队特征对专利战略变革和企业绩效的影响。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 11;12:762499. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.762499. eCollection 2021.
3
Faultline configurations affecting the entrepreneurial team performance of new generation of returning migrant workers in China: An empirical study based on fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis.影响中国新一代返乡农民工创业团队绩效的断层线构型:基于模糊集定性比较分析的实证研究
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 12;13:918128. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.918128. eCollection 2022.
4
Entrepreneurship Education, Psychological Cognition, and Entrepreneurship Activities: An Analysis Based on a Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis.创业教育、心理认知与创业活动:基于模糊集定性比较分析的研究
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 28;12:733319. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.733319. eCollection 2021.
5
Supplier transaction, TMT characteristics, and the persistence of earnings: do their relationship contribute towards sustainable performance of Chinese listed manufacturing sector firms?供应商交易、TMT 特征与盈余持续性:它们之间的关系是否有助于中国上市制造业公司的可持续绩效?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Apr;30(18):53847-53861. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-25742-x. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
6
Top Management Team Knowledge Hiding and Enterprise Innovation Performance: A Moderated Mediation Model.高层管理团队知识隐藏与企业创新绩效:一个有调节的中介模型。
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 20;12:783147. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.783147. eCollection 2021.
7
Exploring the Complex Relationships Between Factors That Affect Employee Cyberloafing Using a Novel Approach: Findings from Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis.运用一种新方法探究影响员工网络偷懒的因素之间的复杂关系:模糊集定性比较分析的结果
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2023 Oct;26(10):772-781. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2023.0002. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
8
Diversity in top management teams and upper echelons of firms.高层管理团队和公司高层的多样性。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2024 Dec;60:101901. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2024.101901. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
9
Chief Executive Officer Proactive Personality and Acquisitions: A Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis of China's Listed Firms.首席执行官的积极人格与企业并购:基于中国上市公司的模糊集定性比较分析
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 9;12:703678. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.703678. eCollection 2021.
10
Is Heterogeneity Better? The Impact of Top Management Team Characteristics on Enterprise Innovation Performance.异质性更好吗?高层管理团队特征对企业创新绩效的影响。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 May 26;12(6):164. doi: 10.3390/bs12060164.

本文引用的文献

1
Éclaircissement to Understand Consumers' Decision-Making Psyche and Gender Effects, a Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis.《明晰以理解消费者决策心理与性别效应:模糊集定性比较分析》
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 2;13:920594. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.920594. eCollection 2022.
2
The Effects of Mandatory CSR Disclosure on Tax Avoidance and Tax Incidence.强制企业社会责任披露对避税和税收归宿的影响。
Front Psychol. 2022 May 19;13:905153. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.905153. eCollection 2022.
3
Effects of Stores' Environmental Components on Chinese Consumers' Emotions and Intentions to Purchase Luxury Brands: Integrating Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Modeling and Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis Approaches.
店铺环境要素对中国消费者购买奢侈品牌的情感及意愿的影响:整合偏最小二乘结构方程模型与模糊集定性比较分析方法
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 8;13:840413. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.840413. eCollection 2022.
4
Does Top Management Team Media Exposure Affect Corporate Social Responsibility?高层管理团队的媒体曝光度会影响企业社会责任吗?
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 24;13:827346. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.827346. eCollection 2022.
5
Effects of Top Management Team Characteristics on Patent Strategic Change and Firm Performance.高层管理团队特征对专利战略变革和企业绩效的影响。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 11;12:762499. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.762499. eCollection 2021.
6
Decision-making quality of younger and older adults in familiar and unfamiliar domains.年轻人和年长者在熟悉和不熟悉领域的决策质量。
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2017 Mar;24(2):135-157. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2016.1176110. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
7
Organizational innovation: the influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations.组织创新:个体、组织和情境因素对医院采用技术创新与管理创新的影响。
Acad Manage J. 1981 Dec;24(4):689-713.
8
Power in top management teams: dimensions, measurement, and validation.高层管理团队的权力:维度、测量与验证。
Acad Manage J. 1992 Aug;35(3):505-38.