• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

富马酸二甲酯与芬戈莫德在临床实践中24个月随访时的疗效比较及停药情况

Comparative efficacy and discontinuation of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod in clinical practice at 24-month follow-up.

作者信息

Hersh Carrie M, Love Thomas E, Bandyopadhyay Anasua, Cohn Samuel, Hara-Cleaver Claire, Bermel Robert A, Fox Robert J, Cohen Jeffrey A, Ontaneda Daniel

机构信息

Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health, Cleveland Clinic, USA.

Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Case Western Reserve University, USA.

出版信息

Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2017 Aug 24;3(3):2055217317715485. doi: 10.1177/2055217317715485. eCollection 2017 Jul-Sep.

DOI:10.1177/2055217317715485
PMID:28890796
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5574489/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod are oral disease-modifying therapies approved to treat relapsing multiple sclerosis. Prior observational studies and our previous 12-month investigation showed comparable clinical efficacy.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess real-world efficacy and discontinuation of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod over 24 months in patients with multiple sclerosis.

METHODS

Patients treated with dimethyl fumarate ( = 395) or fingolimod ( = 264) completed 24-month follow-up in a large academic multiple sclerosis center. Discontinuation rates and measures of disease activity were compared after propensity score weighting. The primary outcome was on-treatment annualized relapse rate ratio. Other measures included rate of drug discontinuation and brain magnetic resonance imaging activity defined as new T2 and/or gadolinium-enhancing lesions.

RESULTS

Propensity score weighting showed excellent covariate balance. At 24 months, dimethyl fumarate demonstrated comparable annualized relapse rate (rate ratio = 1.45, 95% confidence interval 0.53-3.99) and brain magnetic resonance imaging activity (odds ratio = 1.38, 95% confidence interval 0.83-2.32). Dimethyl fumarate patients discontinued therapy earlier compared to fingolimod (hazard ratio = 1.40, 95% confidence interval 1.11-1.77) and were more likely to discontinue therapy due to intolerability (odds ratio = 1.98, 95% confidence interval 1.18-3.23).

CONCLUSION

Dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod had similar reductions in annualized relapse rate in clinical trials, and our real-world experience supports this observation. Dimethyl fumarate-treated patients had higher likelihood of early discontinuation, and this was mostly due to intolerability.

摘要

背景

富马酸二甲酯和芬戈莫德是被批准用于治疗复发型多发性硬化症的口服疾病修正疗法。先前的观察性研究以及我们之前为期12个月的调查显示了相当的临床疗效。

目的

本研究的目的是评估富马酸二甲酯和芬戈莫德在多发性硬化症患者中24个月的实际疗效和停药情况。

方法

在一个大型学术性多发性硬化症中心,接受富马酸二甲酯(n = 395)或芬戈莫德(n = 264)治疗的患者完成了24个月的随访。在倾向评分加权后比较停药率和疾病活动度指标。主要结局是治疗期间的年化复发率比值。其他指标包括药物停药率以及定义为新的T2和/或钆增强病灶的脑磁共振成像活动度。

结果

倾向评分加权显示出良好的协变量平衡。在24个月时,富马酸二甲酯显示出相当的年化复发率(率比 = 1.45,95%置信区间0.53 - 3.99)和脑磁共振成像活动度(优势比 = 1.38,95%置信区间0.83 - 2.32)。与芬戈莫德相比,富马酸二甲酯治疗的患者更早停药(风险比 = 1.40,95%置信区间1.11 - 1.77),并且更有可能因不耐受而停药(优势比 = 1.98,95%置信区间1.18 - 3.23)。

结论

在临床试验中,富马酸二甲酯和芬戈莫德在年化复发率降低方面相似,我们的实际经验支持这一观察结果。接受富马酸二甲酯治疗的患者早期停药的可能性更高,这主要是由于不耐受。

相似文献

1
Comparative efficacy and discontinuation of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod in clinical practice at 24-month follow-up.富马酸二甲酯与芬戈莫德在临床实践中24个月随访时的疗效比较及停药情况
Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2017 Aug 24;3(3):2055217317715485. doi: 10.1177/2055217317715485. eCollection 2017 Jul-Sep.
2
Comparative efficacy and discontinuation of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod in clinical practice at 12-month follow-up.在 12 个月的随访中,二甲基富马酸酯和芬戈莫德在临床实践中的疗效和停药比较。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2016 Nov;10:44-52. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2016.08.002. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
3
Overall and patient-level comparative effectiveness of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod: A precision medicine application to the Observatoire Français de la Sclérose en Plaques registry.富马酸二甲酯与芬戈莫德的总体及患者水平的比较疗效:在法国多发性硬化症观察登记处的精准医学应用
Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2022 Aug 4;8(3):20552173221116591. doi: 10.1177/20552173221116591. eCollection 2022 Jul-Sep.
4
Fingolimod and Dimethyl-Fumarate-Derived Lymphopenia is not Associated with Short-Term Treatment Response and Risk of Infections in a Real-Life MS Population.芬戈莫德和富马酸二甲酯导致的淋巴细胞减少与真实世界 MS 人群的短期治疗反应和感染风险无关。
CNS Drugs. 2020 Apr;34(4):425-432. doi: 10.1007/s40263-020-00714-8.
5
Real-World Adherence and Persistence to Oral Disease-Modifying Therapies in Multiple Sclerosis Patients Over 1 Year.真实世界中多发性硬化症患者口服疾病修正治疗的 1 年用药依从性和持久性。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Aug;23(8):844-852. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.8.844.
6
Comparative Effectiveness of Rituximab and Other Initial Treatment Choices for Multiple Sclerosis.利妥昔单抗与其他多发性硬化初始治疗选择的疗效比较。
JAMA Neurol. 2018 Mar 1;75(3):320-327. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.4011.
7
Discontinuation and comparative effectiveness of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod in 2 centers.富马酸二甲酯和芬戈莫德在两个中心的停药情况及疗效对比
Neurol Clin Pract. 2018 Aug;8(4):292-301. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000487.
8
Comparative analysis of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.二羟戊酸和芬戈莫德在复发缓解型多发性硬化中的比较分析。
J Neurol. 2021 Mar;268(3):941-949. doi: 10.1007/s00415-020-10226-6. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
9
The real-world patient experience of fingolimod and dimethyl fumarate for multiple sclerosis.芬戈莫德和富马酸二甲酯治疗多发性硬化症的真实世界患者体验。
BMC Res Notes. 2016 Sep 7;9(1):434. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-2243-8.
10
Comparative effectiveness using a matching-adjusted indirect comparison between delayed-release dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod for the treatment of multiple sclerosis.使用匹配调整间接比较来评估富马酸二甲酯缓释剂与芬戈莫德治疗多发性硬化症的相对疗效。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 Feb;33(2):175-183. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2016.1248380. Epub 2016 Nov 10.

引用本文的文献

1
The Evolving Role of Monomethyl Fumarate Treatment as Pharmacotherapy for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis.富马酸单甲酯治疗作为复发缓解型多发性硬化症药物疗法的角色演变
Cureus. 2024 Apr 6;16(4):e57714. doi: 10.7759/cureus.57714. eCollection 2024 Apr.
2
A comparison of clinical, utilization, and cost outcomes between oral treatments for multiple sclerosis.比较多发性硬化症口服治疗的临床、利用和成本结果。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2024 Feb 3;30(2):129-140. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.2.129.
3
Safety and Discontinuation Rate of Dimethyl Fumarate (Zadiva) in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: An Observational Retrospective Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of fingolimod and dimethyl fumarate in the treatment of multiple sclerosis: Two-year experience.芬戈莫德与富马酸二甲酯治疗多发性硬化症的比较:两年经验
Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2017 Aug 17;3(3):2055217317725102. doi: 10.1177/2055217317725102. eCollection 2017 Jul-Sep.
2
Comparative Effectiveness Research of Disease-Modifying Therapies for the Management of Multiple Sclerosis: Analysis of a Large Health Insurance Claims Database.用于多发性硬化症管理的疾病修饰疗法的比较有效性研究:对一个大型健康保险理赔数据库的分析
Neurol Ther. 2017 Jun;6(1):91-102. doi: 10.1007/s40120-017-0064-x. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
3
富马酸二甲酯(Zadiva)在多发性硬化症患者中的安全性及停药率:一项观察性回顾性研究
J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 27;12(15):4937. doi: 10.3390/jcm12154937.
4
Handling related publications reporting real-world evidence in network meta-analysis: a case study in multiple sclerosis.处理网络荟萃分析中真实世界证据相关出版物:多发性硬化症的案例研究。
J Comp Eff Res. 2023 Aug;12(8):e220132. doi: 10.57264/cer-2022-0132. Epub 2023 Jul 29.
5
Real-life outcomes for oral disease-modifying treatments of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients: Adherence and adverse event profiles from Marmara University.复发性缓解型多发性硬化症患者口服疾病修正治疗的实际疗效:来自马尔马拉大学的依从性和不良事件特征。
Turk J Med Sci. 2023 Jun;53(3):771-779. doi: 10.55730/1300-0144.5640. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
6
Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparisons of Diroximel Fumarate, Ponesimod, and Teriflunomide for Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis.二羟甲基富马酸酯、波尼松莫德和特立氟胺治疗复发性多发性硬化症的匹配调整间接比较。
CNS Drugs. 2023 May;37(5):441-452. doi: 10.1007/s40263-023-01002-x. Epub 2023 May 8.
7
How to choose initial treatment in multiple sclerosis patients: a case-based approach.多发性硬化症患者初始治疗的选择:基于案例的方法。
Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2022 May;80(5 Suppl 1):159-172. doi: 10.1590/0004-282X-ANP-2022-S128.
8
Overall and patient-level comparative effectiveness of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod: A precision medicine application to the Observatoire Français de la Sclérose en Plaques registry.富马酸二甲酯与芬戈莫德的总体及患者水平的比较疗效:在法国多发性硬化症观察登记处的精准医学应用
Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2022 Aug 4;8(3):20552173221116591. doi: 10.1177/20552173221116591. eCollection 2022 Jul-Sep.
9
Calculating and Comparing the Annualized Relapse Rate and Estimating the Confidence Interval in Relapsing Neurological Diseases.计算和比较复发型神经疾病的年化复发率并估计其置信区间
Front Neurol. 2022 Jun 10;13:875456. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.875456. eCollection 2022.
10
Assessment of fingolimod versus dimethyl fumarate for the treatment of multiple sclerosis; a 24-month follow-up study.芬戈莫德与富马酸二甲酯治疗多发性硬化症的疗效评估:一项24个月的随访研究。
Am J Clin Exp Immunol. 2021 Oct 15;10(3):86-92. eCollection 2021.
Comparative efficacy and discontinuation of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod in clinical practice at 12-month follow-up.
在 12 个月的随访中,二甲基富马酸酯和芬戈莫德在临床实践中的疗效和停药比较。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2016 Nov;10:44-52. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2016.08.002. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
4
Comparative effectiveness using a matching-adjusted indirect comparison between delayed-release dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod for the treatment of multiple sclerosis.使用匹配调整间接比较来评估富马酸二甲酯缓释剂与芬戈莫德治疗多发性硬化症的相对疗效。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 Feb;33(2):175-183. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2016.1248380. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
5
No evidence of disease activity: indirect comparisons of oral therapies for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.无疾病活动证据:复发缓解型多发性硬化症口服治疗药物的间接比较
Adv Ther. 2014 Nov;31(11):1134-54. doi: 10.1007/s12325-014-0167-z. Epub 2014 Nov 21.
6
Safety and efficacy of fingolimod in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (FREEDOMS II): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.芬戈莫德治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症的安全性和疗效(FREEDOMS II):一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照、3 期临床试验。
Lancet Neurol. 2014 Jun;13(6):545-56. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70049-3. Epub 2014 Mar 28.
7
BG-12 in multiple sclerosis.BG-12 治疗多发性硬化症。
Semin Neurol. 2013 Feb;33(1):56-65. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1343796. Epub 2013 May 25.
8
Placebo-controlled phase 3 study of oral BG-12 for relapsing multiple sclerosis.口服 BG-12 治疗复发型多发性硬化症的安慰剂对照 3 期研究。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Sep 20;367(12):1098-107. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1114287.
9
Placebo-controlled phase 3 study of oral BG-12 or glatiramer in multiple sclerosis.安慰剂对照的口服 BG-12 或那他珠单抗治疗多发性硬化症的 3 期研究。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Sep 20;367(12):1087-97. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1206328.
10
The Knowledge Program: an innovative, comprehensive electronic data capture system and warehouse.知识计划:一个创新的、综合性的电子数据捕获系统和仓库。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2011;2011:683-92. Epub 2011 Oct 22.