Department of Endocrinology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Department of Geriatric Endocrinology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Bioengineered. 2022 Jun;13(6):14719-14729. doi: 10.1080/21655979.2022.2101191.
The role of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in the treatment of Graves' orbitopathy (GO) has attracted much attention. This study is to evaluate the benefit and safety of MMF in moderate-to-severe GO. A meta-analysis of clinical control trials comparing MMF (with or without glucocorticoid (GC)) for the treatment of GO with GC was conducted. We searched the databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Wanfang, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), for articles published up to 15 June 2022. The primary outcome is referred to the improvement in overall response, and secondary outcomes included the change in clinical activity score (CAS) and adverse events (AEs). Of the 289 articles initially searched, 6 studies were finally eligible for inclusion. The results showed that MMF (with or without GC) was superior to GC in the treatment of GO (OR 3.34, 95% CI 2.17-5.14; 0.00001). Subgroup analyses also showed that MMF monotherapy was more effective than GC (OR 4.46, 95% CI 2.52-7.87; 0.00001). Compared to methylprednisolone (MP) monotherapy, a combination of MP and MMF was more effective. CAS decreased even more significantly (WMD 0.29, 95% CI 0.10-0.48; = 0.002) and fewer AEs occurred (OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.06-0.72; 0.01) in patients receiving MMF. The pooled data suggested that MMF treatment in GO might be promising. Compared with GC therapy, MMF is safer and more effective. However, more large-sample and high-quality studies targeting MMF use in GO patients and long-term surveillance of prognosis are urgently needed.
霉酚酸酯(MMF)在 Graves 眼病(GO)治疗中的作用引起了广泛关注。本研究旨在评估 MMF 在中重度 GO 中的疗效和安全性。我们对比较 MMF(联合或不联合糖皮质激素(GC))与 GC 治疗 GO 的临床对照试验进行了荟萃分析。我们检索了包括 PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane 图书馆、Web of Science、万方和中国知网(CNKI)在内的数据库,检索截至 2022 年 6 月 15 日发表的文章。主要结局指标为整体反应的改善,次要结局指标包括临床活动评分(CAS)和不良事件(AEs)的变化。在最初搜索的 289 篇文章中,最终有 6 项研究符合纳入标准。结果表明,MMF(联合或不联合 GC)在 GO 治疗中优于 GC(OR 3.34,95%CI 2.17-5.14;0.00001)。亚组分析还表明,MMF 单药治疗比 GC 更有效(OR 4.46,95%CI 2.52-7.87;0.00001)。与单独使用甲泼尼龙(MP)相比,MP 联合 MMF 更为有效。CAS 下降更为显著(WMD 0.29,95%CI 0.10-0.48; = 0.002),且 AEs 发生率更低(OR 0.2,95%CI 0.06-0.72;0.01)。汇总数据表明,MMF 治疗 GO 可能具有前景。与 GC 治疗相比,MMF 更安全有效。然而,目前迫切需要更多针对 GO 患者使用 MMF 的大型样本、高质量研究,并对预后进行长期监测。