Keskin Ali Ümit, Dalan Altay Burak, Çıragil Pınar, Topkaya Aynur Eren
Yeditepe University Faculty of Engineering, Department of Biomedical Engineering İstanbul, Türkiye.
Yeditepe University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Genetics, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Mikrobiyol Bul. 2022 Jul;56(3):480-492. doi: 10.5578/mb.20229708.
For limiting the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the effects on both humoral and cellular immune responses due to vaccines and previous infection should be taken into consideration. In some of the studies about the humoral immune response of the virus and different vaccines, it has been suggested that there can be a discordance between cellular and humoral immune responses during COVID-19 infection. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of humoral and cellular immune responses against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) antigens in three groups of healthcare workers (HCWs) who were vaccinated with two doses of inactivated virus vaccine (CoronaVac), non-vaccinated and recovered COVID-19 infection and non-infected healthy controls by comparing the variables of gender and age and to examine the relationships between them. In this study, the antibody recognizing the receptor binding domain (RBD) of the spike (S) glycoprotein (IgG-S), nucleocapsid protein (IgG-N) of SARS CoV-2 and Interferon Gamma (IFN-γ) titres were determined among non-infected and vaccinated with two doses of inactivated virus vaccine (IVV) (n= 56, 1st group: 27 men, 29 women), non-vaccinated and COVID-19 convalescents (CG) (n= 41; 2nd group: 21 men, 20 women) and non-vaccinated and non-infected healthy controls (HCG) (n= 23, 3rd group: 10 men, 13 women) in 120 HCWs. Diagnosis of all the participants in COVID-19 CG was confirmed for SARS CoV2 infection with reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test according to manufacturer's instruction (Bio-speedy® SARS CoV-2 Double Gene RT-qPCR, Bioeksen R and D Technologies, Turkey). IgG-S and IgG-N antibody levels were determined quantitatively by Abbott Architect i2000 (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL, USA) system. (Qiagen, MD, USA). IFN-γ levels were determined by using the QuantiFERON SARS-CoV-2 Starter Blood Collection Tubes (Qiagen, MD, USA). All statistical data analysis were conducted using SPSS (version 22, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Student's independent t-test or Mann-Whitney U test was used for the differences between bivariate groups and Spearman Rank correlation was used to evaluate the monotonic relationship between nonnormally distributed data sets. Spearman rho > 0.7 denotes high, 0.7 > rho > 0.5 moderate and rho > 0.05 was considered as significant. For each of the immunity parameters, there were no significant differences between males and females in the IVV group, as well as in the CG. In neither of the groups age and immunity parameters were found to be highly correlated. All three immunity parameters of males in CG and IVV groups significantly differed from each other. Although humoral immunity parameters of females between CG and IVV groups did not show any significant difference, the IFN-γ titres significantly differed from each other. There were no significant differences in the IgG-S titres between CG and IVV combined gender groups. However, IgG-N and IFN-γ titres significantly differed from each other between CG and IVV groups. Antibody and particularly IFN-γ levels in two dose CoronaVac vaccinated group were less pronounced in comparison to the observed responses in COVID-19 convalescents group, indicating that CoronaVac may induce substantially less robust and persistent cellular and humoral responses than natural SARS-CoV-2 infection.
为了控制2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行,应考虑疫苗和既往感染对体液免疫和细胞免疫反应的影响。在一些关于该病毒和不同疫苗的体液免疫反应的研究中,有人提出在COVID-19感染期间细胞免疫反应和体液免疫反应之间可能存在不一致。本研究的目的是通过比较性别和年龄变量,确定三组医护人员(HCW)中针对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)抗原的体液免疫和细胞免疫反应的影响,这三组分别是接种两剂灭活病毒疫苗(科兴新冠疫苗)的医护人员、未接种疫苗且康复的COVID-19感染者以及未感染的健康对照,并研究它们之间的关系。在本研究中,在120名医护人员中,测定了未感染且接种两剂灭活病毒疫苗(IVV)(n = 56,第一组:27名男性,29名女性)、未接种疫苗且COVID-19康复者(CG)(n = 41;第二组:21名男性,20名女性)以及未接种疫苗且未感染的健康对照(HCG)(n = 23,第三组:10名男性,13名女性)中识别刺突(S)糖蛋白受体结合域(RBD)的抗体(IgG-S)、SARS-CoV-2核衣壳蛋白(IgG-N)和干扰素γ(IFN-γ)滴度。根据制造商的说明(Bio-speedy® SARS-CoV-2双基因RT-qPCR,Bioeksen研发技术公司,土耳其),通过逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)检测确诊所有COVID-19 CG参与者的SARS-CoV-2感染。IgG-S和IgG-N抗体水平通过雅培Architect i2000(雅培实验室,美国伊利诺伊州雅培公园)系统进行定量测定。(美国马里兰州的Qiagen公司)。IFN-γ水平通过使用QuantiFERON SARS-CoV-2起始血液采集管(美国马里兰州的Qiagen公司)进行测定。所有统计数据分析均使用SPSS(版本22,IBM公司,美国纽约州阿蒙克)进行。双变量组之间的差异采用学生独立t检验或曼-惠特尼U检验,Spearman秩相关用于评估非正态分布数据集之间的单调关系。Spearman相关系数rho > 0.7表示高度相关,0.7 > rho > 0.5表示中度相关,rho > 0.05被认为具有显著性。对于每个免疫参数,IVV组和CG组中的男性和女性之间均无显著差异。在这两组中,均未发现年龄与免疫参数高度相关。CG组和IVV组中男性的所有三个免疫参数均存在显著差异。尽管CG组和IVV组中女性的体液免疫参数没有显示出任何显著差异,但IFN-γ滴度存在显著差异。CG组和IVV组合性别组之间的IgG-S滴度没有显著差异。然而,CG组和IVV组之间的IgG-N和IFN-γ滴度存在显著差异。与COVID-19康复者组中观察到的反应相比,两剂科兴新冠疫苗接种组中的抗体,尤其是IFN-γ水平较低,这表明科兴新冠疫苗可能诱导的细胞免疫和体液免疫反应比自然SARS-CoV-2感染要弱得多且持续时间短。