Graduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima,Japan.
Sakamidorii Hospital, Hiroshima,Japan.
J Aging Phys Act. 2022 Aug 12;31(2):319-329. doi: 10.1123/japa.2022-0037. Print 2023 Apr 1.
Increased physical activity is an effective treatment for knee osteoarthritis that causes knee pain. However, due to the coronavirus disease 2019, noncontact and non-face-to-face interventions have increased, but the quality of evidence supporting their effectiveness remains unclear. The purpose of the study was to assess the quality of evidence of the effects of non-face-to-face and noncontact interventions on knee pain and physical activity in older adults with knee osteoarthritis. A meta-analysis was conducted to determine the effects of different intervention methods (education and exercise). The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Physiotherapy Evidence Database were systematically searched. Four randomized controlled trials were included in the analysis. The meta-analysis demonstrated that the educational intervention group was significantly effective, although supportive evidence was low quality. Educational intervention may be effective, but the effects need to be confirmed by higher quality clinical trials.
增加身体活动是治疗膝关节骨性关节炎引起的膝关节疼痛的有效方法。然而,由于 2019 年冠状病毒病,非接触和非面对面的干预措施有所增加,但支持其有效性的证据质量仍不清楚。本研究的目的是评估非面对面和非接触干预措施对膝关节骨性关节炎老年患者膝关节疼痛和身体活动的影响的证据质量。进行了一项荟萃分析,以确定不同干预方法(教育和运动)的效果。系统检索了 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库、PubMed、护理学和联合健康文献累积索引以及物理治疗证据数据库。有 4 项随机对照试验纳入分析。荟萃分析表明,教育干预组效果显著,但证据质量较低。教育干预可能有效,但需要更高质量的临床试验来证实其效果。