Orlando R C, Turjman N A, Tobey N A, Schreiner V J, Powell D W
Gastroenterology. 1987 Aug;93(2):352-61. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(87)91026-2.
Sucralfate has been reported to protect the esophageal epithelium of the rabbit and cat against acid injury. To determine the contribution of its components, aluminum hydroxide and sucrose octasulfate (SOS), rabbit esophageal epithelia were mounted in Ussing chambers to monitor changes in electrical resistance (R) upon exposure to HCl (pH 1.4-1.6). In untreated tissues, acidification of the luminal bath produced a progressive decline in R, indicating increased epithelial permeability. Sucralfate added to the luminal bath 45 min after acidification increased R to preexposure levels--an effect accompanied by increased luminal pH. Similar to sucralfate, aluminum hydroxide added to the acidified bath increased R and luminal pH. However, the effect of aluminum hydroxide could be abolished by titration with HCl to maintain pH similar to acid-treated control tissues. Tissues treated with sucralfate and whose luminal solutions were titrated with HCl to maintain pH similar to controls no longer exhibited an increase in R but, in contrast to aluminum hydroxide treatment, the acid-induced decline in R was prevented. This action of sucralfate was shown to be a property of its other component, SOS. Sucrose octasulfate, like acid-titrated sucralfate solutions, did not increase luminal bath pH, yet prevented the acid-induced decline in R. Confirmation of protection by SOS was shown by additional morphologic and flux studies. Thus 1 h after luminal bath acidification in the Ussing chamber, SOS-treated tissues demonstrated less damage (injury score 0.6 +/- 0.4 vs. 1.6 +/- 0.3, p less than 0.05) and lower permeability to mannitol (0.003 +/- 0.001 vs. 0.013 +/- 0.005 mumol/h X cm2, p less than 0.05) than untreated tissues. Similarly, 1 h of luminal perfusion with HCl in vivo produced less damage (injury score 1.3 +/- 0.5 vs. 3.5 +/- 0.4, p less than 0.05) and less H+ efflux from the lumen in SOS-treated than untreated tissues. These results indicate that sucralfate can protect against acid injury in esophagus and that this protection is mediated by (a) intraluminal pH buffering through its content of aluminum hydroxide and (b) enhancing mucosal defense against H+ entry and injury through its content of SOS.
据报道,硫糖铝可保护兔和猫的食管上皮免受酸损伤。为了确定其成分氢氧化铝和八硫酸蔗糖酯(SOS)的作用,将兔食管上皮安装在尤斯灌流小室中,以监测暴露于HCl(pH 1.4 - 1.6)时电阻(R)的变化。在未处理的组织中,管腔浴酸化导致R逐渐下降,表明上皮通透性增加。酸化45分钟后添加到管腔浴中的硫糖铝使R增加到暴露前水平,这一效应伴随着管腔pH值升高。与硫糖铝相似,添加到酸化浴中的氢氧化铝增加了R和管腔pH值。然而,用HCl滴定以维持与酸处理对照组织相似的pH值可消除氢氧化铝的作用。用硫糖铝处理且其管腔溶液用HCl滴定以维持与对照相似pH值的组织不再表现出R增加,但与氢氧化铝处理相反,可防止酸诱导的R下降。硫糖铝的这种作用被证明是其另一种成分SOS的特性。八硫酸蔗糖酯与酸滴定的硫糖铝溶液一样,不会增加管腔浴pH值,但可防止酸诱导的R下降。通过额外的形态学和通量研究证实了SOS的保护作用。因此,在尤斯灌流小室中管腔浴酸化1小时后,SOS处理的组织显示出比未处理组织更少的损伤(损伤评分0.6±0.4对1.6±0.3,p<0.05)和对甘露醇更低的通透性(0.003±0.001对0.013±0.005 μmol/h·cm²,p<0.05)。同样,在体内用HCl进行1小时的管腔灌注后,与未处理组织相比,SOS处理的组织损伤更少(损伤评分1.3±0.5对3.5±0.4,p<0.05),并且管腔中H⁺外流更少。这些结果表明,硫糖铝可保护食管免受酸损伤,并且这种保护作用是通过(a)其氢氧化铝成分进行管腔内pH缓冲以及(b)通过其SOS成分增强黏膜对H⁺进入和损伤的防御来介导的。