Veneto Institute of Molecular Medicine, 35129 Padova, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy.
Instituto de Investigación Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid 28041, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), U723, Madrid, Spain.
Trends Biochem Sci. 2022 Dec;47(12):999-1008. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2022.07.005. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
Deep understanding of the pathophysiological role of the mitochondrial respiratory chain (MRC) relies on a well-grounded model explaining how its biogenesis is regulated. The lack of a consistent framework to clarify the modes and mechanisms governing the assembly of the MRC complexes and supercomplexes (SCs) works against progress in the field. The plasticity model was postulated as an attempt to explain the coexistence of mammalian MRC complexes as individual entities and associated in SC species. However, mounting data accumulated throughout the years question the universal validity of the plasticity model as originally proposed. Instead, as we argue here, a cooperative assembly model provides a much better explanation to the phenomena observed when studying MRC biogenesis in physiological and pathological settings.
深入了解线粒体呼吸链(MRC)的病理生理学作用依赖于一个合理的模型,该模型解释了其生物发生是如何受到调节的。缺乏一个一致的框架来阐明调节 MRC 复合物和超级复合物(SCs)组装的方式和机制,这阻碍了该领域的进展。塑性模型被提出来试图解释哺乳动物 MRC 复合物作为个体实体共存并在 SC 物种中相关联的现象。然而,多年来积累的大量数据质疑了最初提出的塑性模型的普遍有效性。相反,正如我们在这里所争论的,协作组装模型为在生理和病理环境中研究 MRC 生物发生时观察到的现象提供了一个更好的解释。