• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Reddit 用户自行达成一致,对 GameStop 逼空事件进行定性。

Self-induced consensus of Reddit users to characterise the GameStop short squeeze.

机构信息

Physics Department and INFN, Unversità di Roma Tor Vergata, 00133, Rome, Italy.

Centro Ricerche Enrico Fermi, 00184, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 12;12(1):13780. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-17925-2.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-17925-2
PMID:35962174
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9374300/
Abstract

The short squeeze of GameStop (GME) shares in mid-January 2021 has been primarily orchestrated by retail investors of the Reddit r/wallstreetbets community. As such, it represents a paramount example of collective coordination action on social media, resulting in large-scale consensus formation and significant market impact. In this work we characterise the structure and time evolution of Reddit conversation data, showing that the occurrence and sentiment of GME-related comments (representing how much users are engaged with GME) increased significantly much before the short squeeze actually took place. Taking inspiration from these early warnings as well as evidence from previous literature, we introduce a model of opinion dynamics where user engagement can trigger a self-reinforcing mechanism leading to the emergence of consensus, which in this particular case is associated to the success of the short squeeze operation. Analytical solutions and model simulations on interaction networks of Reddit users feature a phase transition from heterogeneous to homogeneous opinions as engagement grows, which we qualitatively compare to the sudden hike of GME stock price. Although the model cannot be validated with available data, it offers a possible and minimal interpretation for the increasingly important phenomenon of self-organized collective actions taking place on social networks.

摘要

2021 年 1 月中旬,游戏驿站(GME)股票的轧空主要是由 Reddit r/wallstreetbets 社区的散户投资者策划的。因此,这代表了社交媒体上集体协调行动的一个主要例子,导致了大规模的共识形成和重大的市场影响。在这项工作中,我们描述了 Reddit 对话数据的结构和时间演化,结果表明,与 GME 相关的评论的出现和情绪(代表用户对 GME 的参与程度)在轧空实际发生之前就显著增加了。受这些早期预警以及之前文献中的证据的启发,我们引入了一种意见动态模型,其中用户参与可以触发自我强化机制,导致共识的出现,在这种特殊情况下,共识的出现与轧空操作的成功相关。在 Reddit 用户的交互网络上的分析解和模型模拟中,随着参与度的增加,意见从异质到同质出现相变,我们将其与 GME 股票价格的突然飙升进行了定性比较。尽管该模型无法用现有数据进行验证,但它为在社交网络上发生的日益重要的自组织集体行动现象提供了一种可能的、最小的解释。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1747/9374727/18c81129d684/41598_2022_17925_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1747/9374727/4e06177c741e/41598_2022_17925_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1747/9374727/a553c934c3da/41598_2022_17925_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1747/9374727/fc2f233ae545/41598_2022_17925_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1747/9374727/18c81129d684/41598_2022_17925_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1747/9374727/4e06177c741e/41598_2022_17925_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1747/9374727/a553c934c3da/41598_2022_17925_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1747/9374727/fc2f233ae545/41598_2022_17925_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1747/9374727/18c81129d684/41598_2022_17925_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Self-induced consensus of Reddit users to characterise the GameStop short squeeze.Reddit 用户自行达成一致,对 GameStop 逼空事件进行定性。
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 12;12(1):13780. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-17925-2.
2
Social informedness and investor sentiment in the GameStop short squeeze.游戏驿站空头挤压事件中的社会信息与投资者情绪
Electron Mark. 2023;33(1):23. doi: 10.1007/s12525-023-00632-9. Epub 2023 May 23.
3
How online discussion board activity affects stock trading: the case of GameStop.在线讨论板活动如何影响股票交易:以GameStop为例。
Financ Mark Portf Mang. 2022;36(4):443-472. doi: 10.1007/s11408-022-00407-w. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
4
From Reddit to Wall Street: the role of committed minorities in financial collective action.从Reddit到华尔街:坚定少数群体在金融集体行动中的作用。
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Apr 6;9(4):211488. doi: 10.1098/rsos.211488. eCollection 2022 Apr.
5
Peer Support for Chronic Pain in Online Health Communities: Quantitative Study on the Dynamics of Social Interactions in a Chronic Pain Forum.在线健康社区中的慢性疼痛同伴支持:慢性疼痛论坛中社会互动动态的定量研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Sep 5;26:e45858. doi: 10.2196/45858.
6
Modeling Echo Chambers and Polarization Dynamics in Social Networks.社交网络中的回音室效应和极化动态建模。
Phys Rev Lett. 2020 Jan 31;124(4):048301. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.048301.
7
Social Support and Aggressive Communication on Social Network Sites during the COVID-19 Pandemic.社交媒体网站在新冠疫情期间的社会支持与攻击性行为沟通
Health Commun. 2022 Sep;37(10):1295-1304. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2021.1886399. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
8
Financial recommendations on Reddit, stock returns and cumulative prospect theory.Reddit上的财务建议、股票回报与累积前景理论。
Digit Finance. 2023 Apr 18:1-28. doi: 10.1007/s42521-023-00084-y.
9
Will the reddit rebellion take you to the moon? Evidence from WallStreetBets.Reddit上的这场反叛会带你登上月球吗?来自WallStreetBets的证据。
Financ Mark Portf Mang. 2023;37(1):1-25. doi: 10.1007/s11408-022-00415-w. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
10
Characterizing Social Media Messages Related to Underage JUUL E-Cigarette Buying and Selling: Cross-Sectional Analysis of Reddit Subreddits.描述与未成年人购买和销售JUUL电子烟相关的社交媒体信息:Reddit子版块的横断面分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 20;22(7):e16962. doi: 10.2196/16962.

引用本文的文献

1
Highly engaging events reveal semantic and temporal compression in online community discourse.高度引人入胜的事件揭示了在线社区话语中的语义和时间压缩。
PNAS Nexus. 2025 Feb 24;4(3):pgaf056. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf056. eCollection 2025 Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
From Reddit to Wall Street: the role of committed minorities in financial collective action.从Reddit到华尔街:坚定少数群体在金融集体行动中的作用。
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Apr 6;9(4):211488. doi: 10.1098/rsos.211488. eCollection 2022 Apr.
2
How online discussion board activity affects stock trading: the case of GameStop.在线讨论板活动如何影响股票交易:以GameStop为例。
Financ Mark Portf Mang. 2022;36(4):443-472. doi: 10.1007/s11408-022-00407-w. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
3
Nonuniversal opinion dynamics driven by opposing external influences.
非普遍观点动力学由相反的外部影响驱动。
Phys Rev E. 2019 Nov;100(5-1):050301. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.100.050301.
4
Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization.社交媒体上接触对立观点会加剧政治极化。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Sep 11;115(37):9216-9221. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1804840115. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
5
The science of fake news.假新闻的科学。
Science. 2018 Mar 9;359(6380):1094-1096. doi: 10.1126/science.aao2998. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
6
The emergence of consensus: a primer.共识的形成:入门指南。
R Soc Open Sci. 2018 Feb 21;5(2):172189. doi: 10.1098/rsos.172189. eCollection 2018 Feb.
7
Loyalty in Online Communities.在线社区中的忠诚度。
Proc Int AAAI Conf Weblogs Soc Media. 2017 May;2017:540-543.
8
The spreading of misinformation online.网上错误信息的传播。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jan 19;113(3):554-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1517441113. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
9
Political science. Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook.政治学。在 Facebook 上接触意识形态多样的新闻和观点。
Science. 2015 Jun 5;348(6239):1130-2. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa1160. Epub 2015 May 7.
10
Extracting the multiscale backbone of complex weighted networks.提取复杂加权网络的多尺度骨干
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Apr 21;106(16):6483-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0808904106. Epub 2009 Apr 8.