• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

遗传检测如何回答关于神经发育差异的问题?一种社会学视角。

How do genetic tests answer questions about neurodevelopmental differences? A sociological take.

机构信息

Department of Sociology, University of California, La Jolla, CA, USA.

出版信息

Dev Med Child Neurol. 2022 Dec;64(12):1462-1469. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.15376. Epub 2022 Aug 13.

DOI:10.1111/dmcn.15376
PMID:35962997
Abstract

When it comes to neurodevelopmental differences, a genetic test result can provide compelling answers. However, it is not always clear what the relevant question is. If we want to understand the impact of a genetic diagnosis such as NGLY1 deficiency or the fragile X, trisomy X, or 22q11.2 deletion syndromes on people with neurodevelopmental differences, we must be mindful about what exactly a genetic test is supposed to tell us, where and for whom it matters, and which avenues for action it opens or forecloses. These are all moving targets. Specifically, I discuss the shifting ways a genetic test result can answer the following questions. What is this person's diagnosis? What symptoms and developmental differences are they likely to experience? What is the best way to approach their development, treatment, and care? Will they have a life worth living? When you unpack the sociological nuances of each question, the history behind them, and the uneven ways they are asked, the meanings of the answers change quite radically. I discuss the implications for social inequalities and urge experts and stakeholders to exercise agency when they interpret a genetic diagnosis. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: The questions a genetic test can answer depend on a range of social factors. Whether and how a genetic test result affects diagnosis, identity, prognosis, and treatment is a moving target. Genetics creates questions about a life worth living that it cannot answer alone. Stakeholders must choose the questions about neurodevelopmental differences that genetics should answer.

摘要

当涉及到神经发育差异时,基因测试结果可以提供有说服力的答案。然而,并不总是清楚相关的问题是什么。如果我们想了解神经发育差异患者的 NGLY1 缺乏症或脆性 X、X 三体、22q11.2 缺失综合征等遗传诊断对他们的影响,我们必须注意基因测试应该告诉我们什么,它在何处以及对谁重要,以及它开辟或排除了哪些行动途径。这些都是不断变化的目标。具体来说,我讨论了基因测试结果可以回答以下问题的方式的变化。这个人的诊断是什么?他们可能会经历哪些症状和发育差异?他们的发育、治疗和护理最好采用什么方法?他们会有值得过的生活吗?当你深入研究每个问题的社会学细微差别、它们背后的历史以及它们被提出的不平衡方式时,答案的含义会发生相当大的变化。我讨论了这对社会不平等的影响,并敦促专家和利益相关者在解释遗传诊断时发挥作用。本文的新增内容:基因测试可以回答的问题取决于一系列社会因素。基因测试结果是否以及如何影响诊断、身份、预后和治疗是一个不断变化的目标。遗传学提出了关于值得过的生活的问题,但它无法独自回答这些问题。利益相关者必须选择遗传学应该回答的关于神经发育差异的问题。

相似文献

1
How do genetic tests answer questions about neurodevelopmental differences? A sociological take.遗传检测如何回答关于神经发育差异的问题?一种社会学视角。
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2022 Dec;64(12):1462-1469. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.15376. Epub 2022 Aug 13.
2
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Market power in the United States red meatpacking industry.美国红肉包装行业的市场支配力。
Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2003 Jul;19(2):519-44. doi: 10.1016/s0749-0720(03)00030-6.
5
Evidence-based medicine Training: Kazakhstan experience.循证医学培训:哈萨克斯坦的经验。
Int J Risk Saf Med. 2015;27 Suppl 1:S95-6. doi: 10.3233/JRS-150705.
6
How online crowds influence the way individual consumers answer health questions: an online prospective study.在线众包如何影响个体消费者回答健康问题的方式:一项在线前瞻性研究。
Appl Clin Inform. 2011 Jun 1;2(2):177-89. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2011-01-RA-0006. Print 2011.
7
Right care, first time: a highly personalised and measurement-based care model to manage youth mental health.精准医疗,首次就诊:高度个性化和基于评估的青少年心理健康管理医疗模式。
Med J Aust. 2019 Nov;211 Suppl 9:S3-S46. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50383.
8
[Decisions in conditional situation and theory of mind in schizotypy].[条件情境下的决策与分裂型人格障碍中的心理理论]
Encephale. 2008 Apr;34(2):116-22. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2007.05.003. Epub 2007 Sep 6.
9
Understanding and interpretation of a variant of uncertain significance (VUS) genetic test result by pediatric providers who do not specialize in genetics.非遗传学专业的儿科医疗人员对意义未明的变异(VUS)基因检测结果的理解与解读。
J Genet Couns. 2021 Dec;30(6):1559-1569. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1422. Epub 2021 May 9.
10
Vaccine information seeking on social Q&A services.疫苗信息在社交问答服务上的检索。
Vaccine. 2020 Mar 10;38(12):2691-2699. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.02.010. Epub 2020 Feb 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Do we care? Reporting of genetic diagnoses in multidisciplinary intellectual disability care: a retrospective chart review.我们关心吗?多学科智力障碍护理中遗传诊断的报告:回顾性图表审查。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2024 Sep 16;19(1):346. doi: 10.1186/s13023-024-03323-6.