Wong Soon Yaw Walter, Ler Fen Li Stephanie, Sultana Rehena, Bin Abd Razak Hamid Rahmatullah
Department of General Medicine, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, 1 Jurong East Street 21, Singapore, 609606, Singapore.
National University of Ireland, University Road, Galway, H91 TK33, Ireland.
Knee Surg Relat Res. 2022 Aug 13;34(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s43019-022-00166-y.
Asians have a low venous thromboembolism (VTE) incidence following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This systematic review and network meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the best prophylaxis against VTE in Asians following total knee arthroplasty in current literature.
A systematic search of PubMed, Embase and CINAHL was conducted in adherence with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Prophylaxis types were separated into low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), novel oral anti-coagulants (NOAC), mechanical-only prophylaxis (MOP) and no prophylaxis (NP). The primary outcome was VTE incidence, grouped according to diagnosis modality (ultrasound, venography, clinical). The secondary outcome was bleeding incidence, grouped into minor and major bleeding.
Fourteen eligible articles, totalling 4259 patients, were pooled with the following significant results: NOACs had lower venography-diagnosed VTE incidence than LMWH (12.77%, p = 0.02) and NP (20.64, p < 0.001). MOP had lower venography-diagnosed VTE incidence than LMWH (23.72%, p < 0.001), NOACs (10.95%, p < 0.001) and NP (31.59%, p < 0.001) but, interestingly, a statistically higher ultrasound-diagnosed VTE incidence than LMWH (6.56%, p = 0.024) and NP (4.88%, p = 0.026). No significant differences were observed between prophylaxis types for symptomatic VTE, pulmonary embolism (PE) or death. LMWH and NOACs had a higher minor bleeding incidence than NP (11.71%, p < 0.001 and 6.33%, p < 0.02, respectively). No significant differences were observed between prophylaxis types for major bleeding incidence.
NOACs are a superior form of chemoprophylaxis, compared with LMWH, in reducing venography-diagnosed VTE incidence with no added bleeding incidence. However, routine chemoprophylaxis may not be required as LMWH and NOACs do not appear to reduce symptomatic VTE incidence compared with MOP and NP with an increased minor bleeding incidence. Mechanical prophylaxis in the form of graduated compression stockings or intermittent pneumatic compression should be routinely considered with significantly lower rates of venography-diagnosed VTE compared with NP. On the basis of current evidence, we recommend an individualised approach to select the most appropriate prophylaxis type.
亚洲人全膝关节置换术(TKA)后静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)的发病率较低。本系统评价和网状Meta分析旨在评估当前文献中亚洲人全膝关节置换术后预防VTE的最佳方法。
按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA),对PubMed、Embase和CINAHL进行系统检索。预防类型分为低分子肝素(LMWH)、新型口服抗凝剂(NOAC)、单纯机械预防(MOP)和不预防(NP)。主要结局是VTE发病率,根据诊断方式(超声、静脉造影、临床)进行分组。次要结局是出血发病率,分为轻微出血和严重出血。
纳入14篇符合条件的文章,共4259例患者,结果如下:NOACs经静脉造影诊断的VTE发病率低于LMWH(12.77%,p = 0.02)和NP(20.64,p < 0.001)。MOP经静脉造影诊断的VTE发病率低于LMWH(23.72%,p < 0.001)、NOACs(10.95%,p < 0.001)和NP(31.59%,p < 0.001),但有趣的是,经超声诊断的VTE发病率在统计学上高于LMWH(6.56%,p = 0.024)和NP(4.88%,p = 0.026)。在有症状的VTE、肺栓塞(PE)或死亡的预防类型之间未观察到显著差异。LMWH和NOACs的轻微出血发病率高于NP(分别为11.71%,p < 0.001和6.33%,p < 0.02)。在严重出血发病率的预防类型之间未观察到显著差异。
与LMWH相比,NOACs在降低经静脉造影诊断的VTE发病率且不增加出血发病率方面是一种更优的化学预防形式。然而,可能不需要常规化学预防,因为与MOP和NP相比,LMWH和NOACs似乎并未降低有症状的VTE发病率,且轻微出血发病率有所增加。与NP相比,采用分级加压弹力袜或间歇充气加压形式的机械预防应常规考虑,其经静脉造影诊断的VTE发生率显著较低。基于目前的证据,我们建议采用个体化方法选择最合适的预防类型。