• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

本顿视觉形式辨别测验在预测老年退伍军人神经认知障碍中的作用。

The Benton Visual Form Discrimination Test as a Predictor of Neurocognitive Disorder in Older Veterans.

机构信息

Kaiser Permanente Redwood City, Integrated Behavioral Health Services-Mental Health, Redwood City, CA, USA.

Department of Veterans Affairs, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

出版信息

Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2023 Jan 21;38(1):106-118. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acac067.

DOI:10.1093/arclin/acac067
PMID:35965251
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10308504/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Benton Visual Form Discrimination Test (VFDT) is a commonly used measure of visual discrimination and visual recognition memory and has shown promise in distinguishing between different levels of cognitive impairment. We assess the predictive diagnostic utility of the VFDT in a sample of older Veterans with cognitive concerns.

METHOD

Subjects included a total of 172 mostly male Veterans over the age of 64 (mean = 76.0; SD = 7.6) recruited from a VA clinic specializing in neuropsychological assessment of older Veterans. The clinical sample included 56 subjects diagnosed with Major Neurocognitive Disorder, 74 diagnosed with Mild Neurocognitive Disorder, and 42 with No Neurocognitive Impairment. Impairment categories were modeled in separate multinomial logistic regressions with two versions of the VFDT as predictors: the Visual Form Discrimination Test-Recognition Subtest (VFDT-Rec) test (visual recognition memory) and the Visual Form Discrimination Test-Matching Subtest VFDT-Mat test (visual form discrimination). Years of education were included as a covariate.

RESULTS

After adjusting for education, higher VFDT-Rec total scores were associated with lower odds of being categorized with a greater degree of cognitive/functional impairment (OR 0.66-0.83, p < .001). VFDT-Mat scores showed a similar pattern, but only reached statistical significance for the Major versus No Neurocognitive Impairment (OR = 0.77, p = .0010) and Major versus Mild comparisons (OR = 0.89, p = .0233).

CONCLUSIONS

The VFDT may enhance the confidence of differential diagnosis of dementia in older adult Veterans. Formal education-adjusted norms need to be established for clinical use.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨 Benton 视觉形式辨别测验(VFDT)在认知障碍鉴别诊断中的预测诊断价值。

方法

本研究共纳入 172 名年龄大于 64 岁的退伍军人,他们均来自一家退伍军人事务部的认知评估专科门诊。临床样本包括 56 名被诊断为重度认知障碍、74 名被诊断为轻度认知障碍、42 名认知正常的患者。将两个版本的 VFDT (VFDT-Rec 和 VFDT-Mat)作为预测因子,分别采用二项逻辑回归对以上三个认知损伤组别进行建模,同时校正教育年限的影响。

结果

校正教育年限后,VFDT-Rec 总评分越高,认知/功能损伤程度越轻(OR 0.66-0.83,p<.001)。VFDT-Mat 评分也呈现出相似的模式,但仅在重度与非认知障碍(OR=0.77,p=.0010)和重度与轻度认知障碍(OR=0.89,p=.0233)之间具有统计学意义。

结论

VFDT 可能有助于提高老年退伍军人痴呆症鉴别诊断的准确性。为了临床应用,需要建立正式的教育调整后的常模。

相似文献

1
The Benton Visual Form Discrimination Test as a Predictor of Neurocognitive Disorder in Older Veterans.本顿视觉形式辨别测验在预测老年退伍军人神经认知障碍中的作用。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2023 Jan 21;38(1):106-118. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acac067.
2
Psychometric properties of the benton visual form discrimination test.本顿视觉形式辨别测验的心理测量特性。
Appl Neuropsychol. 2005;12(1):19-23. doi: 10.1207/s15324826an1201_4.
3
Diagnostic utility of Montreal Cognitive Assessment in the Fifth Edition of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: major and mild neurocognitive disorders.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版中蒙特利尔认知评估对重度及轻度神经认知障碍的诊断效用
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015 Feb;16(2):144-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2014.07.021. Epub 2014 Oct 3.
4
Normative data on Benton Visual Form Discrimination Test for older adults and impaired scores in Clinical Dementia Rating 0.5 participants: community-based study. The Osaki-Tajiri Project.老年人本顿视觉形式辨别测试的常模数据及临床痴呆评定量表评分为0.5的参与者的受损分数:基于社区的研究。大崎-田尻项目。
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2009 Feb;63(1):9-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1819.2008.01901.x.
5
New DSM-V neurocognitive disorders criteria and their impact on diagnostic classifications of mild cognitive impairment and dementia in a memory clinic setting.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版新的神经认知障碍标准及其对记忆门诊环境中轻度认知障碍和痴呆诊断分类的影响。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2015 Aug;23(8):768-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2015.01.004. Epub 2015 Jan 29.
6
Factor structure of the Benton Visual retention tests: dimensionalization of the Benton Visual retention test, Benton Visual retention test - multiple choice, and the Visual Form Discrimination Test.本顿视觉保持测验的因子结构:本顿视觉保持测验、本顿视觉保持测验-多项选择和视觉形态辨别测验的维度划分。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2011 Jan;25(1):90-107. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2010.531053. Epub 2010 Nov 19.
7
Specificity of Embedded Performance Validity Tests in Elderly Veterans with Mild and Major Neurocognitive Disorder.轻度和重度神经认知障碍老年退伍军人中嵌入式绩效有效性测试的特异性。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2023 Jul 25;38(5):772-781. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acac106.
8
The association between mental health and cognitive screening scores in older veterans.老年退伍军人的心理健康与认知筛查评分之间的关系。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2012 Mar;20(3):215-27. doi: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e3182410cdb.
9
How valid are subjective ratings of prospective memory in mild cognitive impairment and early dementia?在轻度认知障碍和早期痴呆中,前瞻性记忆的主观评分有多有效?
Gerontology. 2015;61(3):251-7. doi: 10.1159/000371347. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
10
The diagnostic prediction of the Kaplan-Baycrest neurocognitive assessment for identification of mild dementia.基于 Kaplan-Baycrest 神经认知评估的轻度痴呆诊断预测。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2010 Aug;25(5):359-70. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acq034. Epub 2010 May 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Recognition Subtests for Form B of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status: Preliminary Validation.用于评估神经心理状态的可重复成套测验B版的识别子测验:初步验证
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2025 May 21;40(4):814-821. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acae095.

本文引用的文献

1
What does the Dementia Rating Scale-2 measure? The relationship of neuropsychological measures to DRS-2 total and subscale scores in non-demented individuals with Parkinson's disease.痴呆评定量表-2 测量什么?神经心理学测量与非痴呆帕金森病患者 DRS-2 总分和分量表得分的关系。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2023 Jan;37(1):174-193. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2021.1999505. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
2
Exploring Health Outcomes for U.S. Veterans Compared to Non-Veterans from 2003 to 2019.2003年至2019年美国退伍军人与非退伍军人健康结果对比研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 May 18;9(5):604. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9050604.
3
Cortical gray matter progression in idiopathic REM sleep behavior disorder and its relation to cognitive decline.特发性快速眼动睡眠行为障碍中皮质灰质的进展及其与认知衰退的关系。
Neuroimage Clin. 2020;28:102421. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102421. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
4
A Meta-Analysis of Neuropsychological Predictors of Outcome Following Stroke and Other Non-Traumatic Acquired Brain Injuries in Adults.成人脑卒中及其他非创伤性获得性脑损伤后结局的神经心理学预测因素的 Meta 分析。
Neuropsychol Rev. 2020 Jun;30(2):194-223. doi: 10.1007/s11065-020-09433-9. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
5
Pattern of cognitive deficits in vascular dementia.血管性痴呆的认知功能障碍模式。
Indian J Med Res. 2019 Apr;149(4):503-507. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1336_17.
6
Visuospatial dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease and behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia.阿尔茨海默病和行为变异额颞叶痴呆的视觉空间功能障碍。
J Neurol Sci. 2019 Jul 15;402:74-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2019.04.019. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
7
Risk and predictors of dementia and parkinsonism in idiopathic REM sleep behaviour disorder: a multicentre study.特发性 REM 睡眠行为障碍患者发生痴呆和帕金森病的风险及预测因素:一项多中心研究。
Brain. 2019 Mar 1;142(3):744-759. doi: 10.1093/brain/awz030.
8
Differences in road-crossing decisions between healthy older adults and patients with Alzheimer's disease.健康老年人与阿尔茨海默病患者在过马路决策上的差异。
J Safety Res. 2018 Sep;66:81-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2018.06.003. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
9
Can visuospatial measures improve the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease?视觉空间测量能否改善阿尔茨海默病的诊断?
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2017 Nov 6;10:66-74. doi: 10.1016/j.dadm.2017.10.004. eCollection 2018.
10
Differentiation of neuropsychological features between posterior cortical atrophy and early onset Alzheimer's disease.后部皮质萎缩与早发性阿尔茨海默病神经心理学特征的差异
BMC Neurol. 2018 May 10;18(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12883-018-1068-6.