Tan Haidong, Zhou Ruiquan, Liu Liguo, Si Shuang, Sun Yongliang, Xu Li, Liu Xiaolei, Yang Zhiying
Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Ann Transl Med. 2022 Jul;10(14):764. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-3074.
Open enucleation (OE) is often performed for giant liver hemangioma (LH) because of its advantage in maximum preservation of functional liver parenchyma. Laparoscopic enucleation (LE) has been applied to LHs more frequently for its potential advantages in postoperative recovery and blood loss. However, to date, LE is still a difficult and complex surgical technique especially when the hemangioma is located in the right hemi liver. The aim of this study was to analyze whether LE is superior to OE for LH in the right hemi liver.
Demographics and perioperative data of patients who underwent LE or OE for LH in the right hemi liver between May 2013 and July 2020 were collected. To decrease the selection bias, patients who underwent OE in first 2 years and those underwent LE in next 5 years by a same operation team were included. The data of sex, age, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, largest tumor size, and removed tumor number were enrolled in the propensity score matching (PSM) method to compensate for differences in the baseline characteristics between LE and OE groups. The perioperative outcomes were compared between 2 matched groups after PSM method.
A total of 110 patients (36 LE 74 OE) were matched by age, sex, BMI, ASA grade score, largest tumor size, removed tumor number and tumor location. Finally, 34 patients in each group were retained after PSM. There were no significant differences in operative time, estimated blood loss, amount of autologous transfusion, morbidity grade and the levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) on postoperative day 1 or 3 or 5. LE was associated with a significantly higher rate of use of the Pringle maneuver (P<0.001), shorter time to oral feeding (P<0.001) and shorter postoperative length of stay (P<0.001).
For LHs in the right hemi liver, the perioperative safety of LE is not inferior to OE, and LE seems to achieves a faster recovery from surgery compared with OE.
由于在最大程度保留功能性肝实质方面具有优势,开放性肝血管瘤剥除术(OE)常用于巨大肝血管瘤(LH)的治疗。腹腔镜肝血管瘤剥除术(LE)因其在术后恢复和失血方面的潜在优势,已更频繁地应用于肝血管瘤的治疗。然而,迄今为止,LE仍是一种困难且复杂的手术技术,尤其是当血管瘤位于右半肝时。本研究的目的是分析在右半肝肝血管瘤的治疗中,LE是否优于OE。
收集2013年5月至2020年7月期间因右半肝肝血管瘤接受LE或OE治疗的患者的人口统计学和围手术期数据。为减少选择偏倚,纳入由同一手术团队在前2年进行OE治疗以及在接下来5年进行LE治疗的患者。将性别、年龄、体重指数(BMI)、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分、最大肿瘤大小和切除肿瘤数量的数据采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)方法,以弥补LE组和OE组之间基线特征的差异。采用PSM方法后,比较两个匹配组的围手术期结局。
总共110例患者(36例行LE,74例行OE)按年龄、性别、BMI、ASA分级评分、最大肿瘤大小、切除肿瘤数量和肿瘤位置进行匹配。PSM后,每组最终保留34例患者。在手术时间、估计失血量、自体输血量、并发症分级以及术后第1天、第3天或第5天的丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT)和天冬氨酸转氨酶(AST)水平方面,两组之间无显著差异。LE组的Pringle手法使用率显著更高(P<0.001),经口进食时间更短(P<0.001),术后住院时间更短(P<0.001)。
对于右半肝肝血管瘤,LE的围手术期安全性不低于OE,且与OE相比,LE似乎能实现更快的术后恢复。