Jones Pete R, Ungewiss Judith, Eichinger Peter, Wörner Michael, Crabb David P, Schiefer Ulrich
Department of Optometry and Visual Sciences, School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Competence Center "Vision Research", Study Course Ophthalmic Optics and Optometry, University of Applied Sciences, Aalen, Germany.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Jul 29;16:914459. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.914459. eCollection 2022.
(i) To assess how well contrast sensitivity (CS) predicts night-time hazard detection distance (a key component of night driving ability), in normally sighted older drivers, relative to a conventional measure of high contrast visual acuity (VA); (ii) To evaluate whether CS can be accurately quantified within a night driving simulator.
Participants were 15 (five female) ophthalmologically healthy adults, aged 55-81 years. CS was measured in a driving simulator using Landolt Cs, presented under or driving conditions, and or glare. In the driving conditions, the participant was asked to simultaneously maintain a (virtual) speed of 60 km/h on a country road. In the conditions, two calibrated LED arrays, moved by cable robots, simulated the trajectories and luminance characteristics of the (low beam) headlights of an approaching car. For comparison, CS was also measured clinically (with and without glare) using a Optovist I instrument (Vistec Inc., Olching, Germany). Visual acuity (VA) thresholds were also assessed at high and low contrast using the Freiburg Visual Acuity Test (FrACT) under photopic conditions. As a measure of driving performance, median hazard detection distance (MHDD) was computed, in meters, across three kinds of simulated obstacles of varying contrast.
Contrast sensitivity and low contrast VA were both significantly associated with driving performance (both < 0.01), whereas conventional high contrast acuity was not ( = 0.10). There was good correlation ( < 0.01) between CS measured in the driving simulator and a conventional clinical instrument (Optovist I). As expected, CS was shown to decrease in the presence of glare, in dynamic driving conditions, and as a function of age (all < 0.01).
Contrast sensitivity and low contrast VA predict night-time hazard detection ability in a manner that conventional high contrast VA does not. Either may therefore provide a useful metric for assessing fitness to drive at night, particularly in older individuals. CS measurements can be made within a driving simulator, and the data are in good agreement with conventional clinical methods (Optovist I).
(i) 评估在视力正常的老年驾驶员中,相对于传统的高对比度视力(VA)测量方法,对比敏感度(CS)预测夜间危险检测距离(夜间驾驶能力的关键组成部分)的效果如何;(ii) 评估是否可以在夜间驾驶模拟器中准确量化CS。
研究对象为15名(5名女性)眼科健康的成年人,年龄在55 - 81岁之间。在驾驶模拟器中使用兰多尔特C视标测量CS,分别在正常或模拟驾驶条件下,以及有或无眩光的情况下进行。在模拟驾驶条件下,要求参与者在乡村道路上同时保持60公里/小时的(虚拟)速度。在有眩光的条件下,两个由电缆机器人移动的校准LED阵列模拟了一辆驶来汽车(近光灯)的轨迹和亮度特征。为作比较,还使用Optovist I仪器(德国奥尔钦的Vistec公司)在临床环境中(有和无眩光)测量CS。在明视觉条件下,使用弗莱堡视力测试(FrACT)评估高对比度和低对比度下的视力(VA)阈值。作为驾驶性能的一项指标,计算了跨越三种对比度不同的模拟障碍物的中位危险检测距离(MHDD),单位为米。
对比敏感度和低对比度VA均与驾驶性能显著相关(两者P均<0.01),而传统的高对比度视力则不然(P = 0.10)。在驾驶模拟器中测量的CS与传统临床仪器(Optovist I)之间存在良好的相关性(P < 0.01)。正如预期的那样,在有眩光、动态驾驶条件下以及作为年龄的函数时,CS均会降低(所有P均<0.01)。
对比敏感度和低对比度VA以传统高对比度VA所不具备的方式预测夜间危险检测能力。因此,两者都可为评估夜间驾驶适宜性提供有用的指标,特别是在老年人中。CS测量可在驾驶模拟器中进行,且数据与传统临床方法(Optovist I)高度一致。