• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年夜间驾驶员在 Salisbury 眼部评估驾驶研究中的视觉特征。

Visual characteristics of elderly night drivers in the Salisbury Eye Evaluation Driving Study.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Howard University Hospital, Washington, DC 20060, USA.

出版信息

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Aug 3;53(9):5161-7. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-9866.

DOI:10.1167/iovs.12-9866
PMID:22743327
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4620734/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To characterize visual factors among those who continue to drive and those who restrict night driving in the elderly population.

METHODS

The Salisbury Eye Evaluation Driving Study (SEEDS) is a study of vision, cognition, and driving behaviors of older drivers living in the greater Salisbury, Maryland, metropolitan area. Patients were recruited from listings in the Department of Motor Vehicle Administration. Data are reported from two visits conducted 2 years apart. Night driving was assessed using a real-time driving assessment tool, the Driving Monitor System. Night driving was defined by the presence of at least one episode of driving at night during a 5-day time period (seasonally adjusted). Participants also underwent a battery of cognitive and visual function testing including distance acuity, contrast sensitivity, and visual fields. Logistic regression was used to model factors associated with night driving.

RESULTS

Complete data were available for 990 of the 1080 participants (92%) attending both visits; 41% of participants were driving at night in each visit. Those who were younger (P < 0.001), male (P < 0.001), and had better measures of cognitive (P = 0.007) and visual function were observed driving at night, whereas those who were older, female, and had poorer measures of cognitive and visual function restricted their night driving behavior. An association was observed between depressive symptoms and less night driving in females (P = 0.003). In multivariate analysis, better contrast sensitivity (odds ratio [OR] 1.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.36, P = 0.02) and visual field detection (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.00-1.47, P = 0.05) were associated with driving at night. Visual acuity was not found to be significantly related to night driving (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.95-1.18, P = 0.12).

CONCLUSIONS

Restricting driving at night is a multifactorial behavior that has a vision component, notably poor contrast sensitivity, and some loss of visual fields.

摘要

目的

描述继续开车和限制老年人夜间驾驶的人群中的视觉因素。

方法

索尔兹伯里眼评估驾驶研究(SEEDS)是一项对马里兰州索尔兹伯里大都市区老年人的视力、认知和驾驶行为的研究。患者从机动车管理局的名单中招募。数据来自两年一次的两次就诊报告。夜间驾驶使用实时驾驶评估工具——驾驶监测系统进行评估。夜间驾驶的定义是在 5 天时间内至少有一次夜间驾驶(季节性调整)。参与者还接受了一系列认知和视觉功能测试,包括远距离视力、对比敏感度和视野。使用逻辑回归来对与夜间驾驶相关的因素进行建模。

结果

参加两次就诊的 1080 名参与者中有 990 名(92%)完成了完整的数据;在每次就诊中,41%的参与者夜间驾驶。年龄较小(P<0.001)、男性(P<0.001)、认知功能(P=0.007)和视觉功能更好的人夜间驾驶,而年龄较大、女性、认知和视觉功能较差的人限制夜间驾驶行为。观察到抑郁症状与女性夜间驾驶次数减少之间存在关联(P=0.003)。在多变量分析中,更好的对比敏感度(优势比[OR]1.18,95%置信区间[CI]1.02-1.36,P=0.02)和视野检测(OR 1.21,95%CI 1.00-1.47,P=0.05)与夜间驾驶有关。未发现视力与夜间驾驶显著相关(OR 1.08,95%CI 0.95-1.18,P=0.12)。

结论

限制夜间驾驶是一种多因素行为,其中包括视觉因素,尤其是较差的对比敏感度和部分视野丧失。

相似文献

1
Visual characteristics of elderly night drivers in the Salisbury Eye Evaluation Driving Study.老年夜间驾驶员在 Salisbury 眼部评估驾驶研究中的视觉特征。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Aug 3;53(9):5161-7. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-9866.
2
Visual and cognitive deficits predict stopping or restricting driving: the Salisbury Eye Evaluation Driving Study (SEEDS).视力和认知缺陷预示着停止或限制驾驶:索尔兹伯里眼科评估驾驶研究(SEEDS)。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009 Jan;50(1):107-13. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-2367. Epub 2008 Aug 21.
3
Visual and cognitive predictors of performance on brake reaction test: Salisbury eye evaluation driving study.制动反应测试表现的视觉和认知预测因素:索尔兹伯里眼评估驾驶研究
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2007 Jul-Aug;14(4):216-22. doi: 10.1080/09286580701502988.
4
Older drivers and rapid deceleration events: Salisbury Eye Evaluation Driving Study.老年驾驶员与急减速事件:索尔兹伯里眼部评估驾驶研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Sep;58:279-85. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.06.002. Epub 2012 Jun 27.
5
Cognitive and vision loss affects the topography of the attentional visual field.认知和视力丧失会影响注意力视野的拓扑结构。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008 Oct;49(10):4672-8. doi: 10.1167/iovs.07-1112. Epub 2008 May 23.
6
The decline in attentional visual fields over time among older participants in the Salisbury Eye Evaluation Driving Study.在 Salisbury Eye Evaluation Driving Study 中,随着时间的推移,老年参与者的注意力视场逐渐下降。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Mar 13;54(3):1839-44. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8874.
7
A prospective, population-based study of the role of visual impairment in motor vehicle crashes among older drivers: the SEE study.一项基于人群的前瞻性研究:视觉障碍在老年驾驶员机动车碰撞事故中的作用——SEE研究。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007 Apr;48(4):1483-91. doi: 10.1167/iovs.06-0474.
8
Measures of visual function and their association with driving modification in older adults.老年人视觉功能的测量及其与驾驶调整的关联。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006 Feb;47(2):514-20. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-0934.
9
Associations of visual function with physical outcomes and limitations 5 years later in an older population: the Beaver Dam eye study.老年人群5年后视觉功能与身体状况及功能受限的关联:比弗迪尔姆眼科研究
Ophthalmology. 2003 Apr;110(4):644-50. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(02)01935-8.
10
Driving cessation and driving limitation in glaucoma: the Salisbury Eye Evaluation Project.青光眼患者的驾驶停止与驾驶限制:索尔兹伯里眼科评估项目
Ophthalmology. 2009 Oct;116(10):1846-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.03.033. Epub 2009 Jul 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of visual function under various lighting conditions in a cohort of active older drivers: dimensionality and principal metrics.一组活跃的老年驾驶员在各种光照条件下的视觉功能评估:维度与主要指标
Front Neurosci. 2025 Apr 15;19:1511366. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1511366. eCollection 2025.
2
Evaluation and Modification of the Multifactorial Model of Driving Safety Among Older Adults.老年人驾驶安全多因素模型的评估与修正
Innov Aging. 2025 Jan 11;9(2):igae113. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igae113. eCollection 2025.
3
Visual Function and Driving Performance Under Different Lighting Conditions in Older Drivers: Preliminary Results From an Observational Study.老年驾驶员在不同光照条件下的视觉功能与驾驶性能:一项观察性研究的初步结果
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Jun 26;8:e58465. doi: 10.2196/58465.
4
Prevalence of Reduced Vision among UK Elderly Drivers: The Bridlington Eye Assessment Project (BEAP)-A Cross-Sectional Study.英国老年驾驶员视力减退的患病率:布里德灵顿眼评估项目(BEAP)——一项横断面研究。
J Ophthalmol. 2022 Sep 15;2022:8321948. doi: 10.1155/2022/8321948. eCollection 2022.
5
Contrast Sensitivity and Night Driving in Older People: Quantifying the Relationship Between Visual Acuity, Contrast Sensitivity, and Hazard Detection Distance in a Night-Time Driving Simulator.老年人的对比敏感度与夜间驾驶:在夜间驾驶模拟器中量化视力、对比敏感度和危险检测距离之间的关系
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Jul 29;16:914459. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.914459. eCollection 2022.
6
Functional Assessment of Driving Capacity of Older Drivers Compared with Non-older Drivers Using Clinical Evaluations and Driving Simulations.与非老年驾驶员相比,通过临床评估和驾驶模拟对老年驾驶员驾驶能力进行功能评估。
Ann Geriatr Med Res. 2021 Jun;25(2):105-112. doi: 10.4235/agmr.21.0027. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
7
Impact of Visual Field Loss on Vision-Specific Quality of Life in African Americans: The African American Eye Disease Study.视野丧失对非裔美国人视功能相关生活质量的影响:非裔美国人眼病研究。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2021 Sep;229:52-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.02.008. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
8
Establishment of a normative database and evaluation of the test-retest repeatability of the Spaeth/Richman contrast sensitivity test.建立Spaeth/Richman对比敏感度测试的标准数据库并评估其重测重复性。
Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2019 Jan;63(1):73-81. doi: 10.1007/s10384-018-0640-3. Epub 2018 Nov 10.
9
Association of Cadmium and Lead Exposure With the Incidence of Contrast Sensitivity Impairment Among Middle-aged Adults.镉和铅暴露与中年人群对比敏感度损害发生率的关联。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018 Dec 1;136(12):1342-1350. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.3931.
10
The Alabama VIP older driver study rationale and design: examining the relationship between vision impairment and driving using naturalistic driving techniques.阿拉巴马州老年贵宾驾驶员研究的基本原理与设计:运用自然驾驶技术研究视力障碍与驾驶之间的关系。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2018 Feb 7;18(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12886-018-0686-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Driving self-restriction in high-risk conditions: how do older drivers compare to others?高风险情境下的驾驶自我约束:高龄驾驶员与其他驾驶员相比如何?
J Safety Res. 2011 Feb;42(1):67-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2010.12.001. Epub 2011 Jan 5.
2
Older adults' safety perceptions of driving situations: towards a new driving self-regulation scale.老年人对驾驶情境的安全感知:迈向新的驾驶自我调节量表。
Accid Anal Prev. 2011 May;43(3):1003-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.11.031. Epub 2011 Jan 11.
3
The role of contrast sensitivity in global motion processing deficits in the elderly.对比敏感度在老年人整体运动处理缺陷中的作用。
J Vis. 2010 Aug 17;10(10):15. doi: 10.1167/10.10.15.
4
Simulated cataract and low contrast stimuli impair cognitive performance in older adults: implications for neuropsychological assessment and everyday function.模拟白内障和低对比度刺激会损害老年人的认知表现:对神经心理学评估和日常功能的影响。
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2011 Jan;18(1):1-21. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2010.501404. Epub 2010 Aug 25.
5
Driving patterns of older adults: results from the Second Injury Control and Risk Survey.老年人驾驶模式:来自第二次伤害控制和风险调查的结果。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Oct;58(10):1931-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03010.x.
6
Predictors of lane-change errors in older drivers.老年驾驶员变道失误的预测因素。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Mar;58(3):457-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02729.x.
7
Older drivers and failure to stop at red lights.老年司机与闯红灯。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2010 Feb;65(2):179-83. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glp136. Epub 2009 Oct 12.
8
Urban and rural differences in older drivers' failure to stop at stop signs.城乡老年司机未能在停车标志前停车的差异。
Accid Anal Prev. 2009 Sep;41(5):995-1000. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.06.004. Epub 2009 Jun 21.
9
Poor sense of direction is associated with constricted driving space in older drivers.方向感差与老年驾驶员驾驶空间受限有关。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2009 May;64(3):348-55. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbp017. Epub 2009 Apr 9.
10
Reducing contrast makes speeds in a video-based driving simulator harder to discriminate as well as making them appear slower.降低对比度会使基于视频的驾驶模拟器中的速度更难辨别,同时也会使它们看起来更慢。
Perception. 2008;37(8):1269-75. doi: 10.1068/p5821.