Center for Infectious Disease Modeling and Analysis (CIDMA), Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, United States.
Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, United States.
Int J Public Health. 2022 Jul 27;67:1604659. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2022.1604659. eCollection 2022.
To quantify the utility of RT-PCR and rapid antigen tests in preventing post-arrival transmission based on timing of the pre-departure test. We derived analytical expressions to compute post-arrival transmission when no test is performed, and when either an RT-PCR or any of 18 rapid antigen tests is performed at specified times before arrival. We determined the diagnostic sensitivity of the rapid antigen tests by propagating their RT-PCR percent positive agreement onto known RT-PCR diagnostic sensitivity. Depending on the rapid antigen test used, conducting a rapid antigen test immediately before departure reduces post-arrival transmission between 37.4% (95% CrI: 28.2%-40.7%) and 46.7% (95% CrI:40.0%-49.3%), compared to a 31.1% (95% CrI: 26.3%-33.5%) reduction using an RT-PCR 12 h before arrival. Performance of each rapid antigen test differed by diagnostic sensitivity over the course of disease. However, these differences were smaller than those engendered by testing too early. Testing closer to arrival-ideally on the day of arrival-is more effective at reducing post-arrival transmission than testing earlier. Rapid antigen tests perform the best in this application due to their short turnaround time.
基于出发前检测的时间,定量评估 RT-PCR 和快速抗原检测在防止抵达后传播中的效用。我们推导出了分析表达式,以计算在未进行检测以及在抵达前特定时间进行 RT-PCR 或 18 种快速抗原检测之一时的抵达后传播。我们通过将其 RT-PCR 阳性百分比一致性传播到已知的 RT-PCR 诊断敏感性来确定快速抗原检测的诊断敏感性。根据使用的快速抗原检测,与在抵达前 12 小时进行 RT-PCR 相比,在出发前立即进行快速抗原检测可将抵达后的传播减少 37.4%(95%CrI:28.2%-40.7%)和 46.7%(95%CrI:40.0%-49.3%),而 RT-PCR 检测的减少幅度为 31.1%(95%CrI:26.3%-33.5%)。在疾病过程中,每种快速抗原检测的诊断敏感性不同,但其性能差异小于检测过早引起的差异。与提前检测相比,越接近抵达时间(理想情况下在抵达当天)进行检测,减少抵达后传播的效果越好。由于快速抗原检测具有较短的周转时间,因此在这种应用中表现最佳。