Păsărelu Costina-Ruxandra, Dobrean Anca, Florean Ionuț Stelian, Predescu Elena
Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Babeș-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
The International Institute for the Advanced Studies of Psychotherapy and Applied Mental Health, Babeș-Bolyai University, Republicii St., No. 37, 400015 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Curr Psychol. 2022 Aug 4:1-13. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-03520-1.
Parental stress is related to child mental health problems, with numerous evidence indicating that it is an important predictor of parenting and parent-child relationship. New approaches to psychopathology could be particularly informative for clinical research, however, there is limited research that employs network analysis with parents. Network analysis could contribute to a better understanding of the relationship between child mental health problems and parental stress by highlighting the most central nodes and how the two constructs influence each other. The scope of the study was to identify potential new intervention targets to reduce the mental health problems of children and prevent contagion between parent stress and child psychopathology. Furthermore, we also sought to test whether the dynamic between parental stress and child psychopathology differs across the level of parent stress and child total difficulties. In this endeavor, we had three main directions. First, we estimated a network at the level of child mental health problems and identified the most central nodes. Second, we mapped the main paths through which parent stress and child mental health problems communicate with each other. Third, we investigated the network invariance across the level of parent stress (high vs moderate) and child mental health problems (low vs. high total difficulties). Participants ( = 1014) were parents of children with ages between four and 17 years old. The analyses were conducted in RStudio. Results indicated that perceived coping was a central node, bridging the two constructs. The global strength of the network was higher for parents who reported high levels of stress compared to those who reported only moderate levels of stress. In contrast, we found that the global strength of the network was lower for children with high levels of total difficulties compared to those with low levels of total difficulties. In conclusion, we argue the importance of focusing on the targeting nodes with high bridge centrality, such as perceived coping, for designing prevention and intervention programs. Future research should use temporal dynamics between parental stress and child mental health problems and explore mechanisms between the two constructs.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12144-022-03520-1.
父母压力与儿童心理健康问题相关,大量证据表明它是养育方式和亲子关系的重要预测因素。精神病理学的新方法可能对临床研究特别有参考价值,然而,运用网络分析研究父母的相关研究有限。网络分析通过突出最核心的节点以及这两个结构如何相互影响,有助于更好地理解儿童心理健康问题与父母压力之间的关系。本研究的范围是确定潜在的新干预目标,以减少儿童的心理健康问题,并防止父母压力与儿童精神病理学之间的相互影响。此外,我们还试图检验父母压力与儿童精神病理学之间的动态关系在父母压力水平和儿童总体困难程度上是否存在差异。在这项研究中,我们有三个主要方向。第一,我们在儿童心理健康问题层面估计了一个网络,并确定了最核心的节点。第二,我们绘制了父母压力与儿童心理健康问题相互沟通的主要路径。第三,我们研究了父母压力水平(高与中等)和儿童心理健康问题(低与高总体困难程度)层面的网络不变性。参与者(n = 1014)是年龄在4至17岁儿童的父母。分析在RStudio中进行。结果表明,感知应对是一个核心节点,连接着这两个结构。与报告压力水平中等的父母相比,报告压力水平高的父母的网络全局强度更高。相比之下,我们发现总体困难程度高的儿童的网络全局强度低于总体困难程度低的儿童。总之,我们认为在设计预防和干预项目时,关注具有高桥接中心性的目标节点(如感知应对)非常重要。未来的研究应利用父母压力与儿童心理健康问题之间的时间动态关系,并探索这两个结构之间的机制。
在线版本包含可在10.1007/s12144-022-03520-1获取的补充材料。