• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

网约车服务:是公共交通的竞争还是补充以降低事故率?以马德里为例。

Ride-hailing services: Competition or complement to public transport to reduce accident rates. The case of Madrid.

作者信息

Flor María, Ortuño Armando, Guirao Begoña

机构信息

Department of Civil Engineering, University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain.

University Institute of the Water and the Environmental Sciences, University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 27;13:951258. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.951258. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.951258
PMID:35967705
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9363903/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The transport and mobility sector is experiencing profound transformations. These changes are mainly due to: environmental awareness, the increase in the population of large urban areas and the size of cities, the aging of the population and the emergence of relevant technological innovations that have changed consumption habits, such as electronic commerce or the sharing economy. The introduction of new services such as Uber or Cabify is transforming urban and metropolitan mobility, which has to adapt to this new scenario and the very concept of mobility.

OBJECTIVE

Thus, the purpose of this study was to evaluate whether ride-hailing platforms substitute or complement public transport to reduce accident rates, considering the two basic transport zones of Madrid: "The Central Almond" and the periphery.

METHODS

The data were collected from the 21 districts of Madrid for the period 2013-2019, and they were analyzed by a Random Effects Negative Binominal model.

RESULTS

The results obtained in this study suggest that since the arrival of Uber and Cabify to the municipality of Madrid the number of fatalities and serious injuries in traffic accidents has been reduced. Traffic accidents on weekends and holidays, with at least one serious injury or death, have also been reduced. However, the number of minor injuries has increased in the central districts of Madrid.

CONCLUSION

Overall, what was found in this study supports the hypothesis that these services replace the urban buses. However, these services improve the supply to users with greater difficulties to access taxis or public transport, constituting an alternative mode of transport for high-risk drivers. Therefore, such findings may be quite useful for policy makers to better define regulatory policies for these services.

摘要

引言

交通运输和出行领域正在经历深刻变革。这些变化主要归因于:环保意识、大城市地区人口及城市规模的增长、人口老龄化以及电子商务或共享经济等改变消费习惯的相关技术创新的出现。优步(Uber)或卡比菲(Cabify)等新服务的引入正在改变城市和大都市的出行方式,出行方式必须适应这种新情况以及出行的概念本身。

目的

因此,本研究的目的是评估网约车平台是替代还是补充公共交通以降低事故率,研究范围涵盖马德里的两个基本交通区域:“中央杏仁区”和周边地区。

方法

收集了马德里21个区2013 - 2019年期间的数据,并通过随机效应负二项式模型进行分析。

结果

本研究获得的结果表明,自优步和卡比菲进入马德里市以来,交通事故中的死亡人数和重伤人数有所减少。周末和节假日发生的至少造成一人重伤或死亡的交通事故也有所减少。然而,马德里市中心区的轻伤人数有所增加。

结论

总体而言,本研究的发现支持了这些服务替代城市公交车的假设。然而,这些服务改善了对乘坐出租车或公共交通有较大困难的用户的服务供给,为高风险驾驶者构成了一种替代出行方式。因此,这些研究结果可能对政策制定者更好地界定这些服务的监管政策非常有用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba0b/9363903/fd0275718f6a/fpsyg-13-951258-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba0b/9363903/e4ea5f9a12c8/fpsyg-13-951258-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba0b/9363903/1d7068b430a1/fpsyg-13-951258-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba0b/9363903/fd0275718f6a/fpsyg-13-951258-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba0b/9363903/e4ea5f9a12c8/fpsyg-13-951258-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba0b/9363903/1d7068b430a1/fpsyg-13-951258-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba0b/9363903/fd0275718f6a/fpsyg-13-951258-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Ride-hailing services: Competition or complement to public transport to reduce accident rates. The case of Madrid.网约车服务:是公共交通的竞争还是补充以降低事故率?以马德里为例。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 27;13:951258. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.951258. eCollection 2022.
2
Does the Implementation of Ride-Hailing Services Affect Urban Road Safety? The Experience of Madrid.打车服务的实施是否会影响城市道路安全?马德里的经验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 5;19(5):3078. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19053078.
3
Ride-Hailing Services and Alcohol Consumption: Longitudinal Analysis.网约车服务与酒精消费:纵向分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 27;23(1):e15402. doi: 10.2196/15402.
4
Were ride-hailing fares affected by the COVID-19 pandemic? Empirical analyses in Atlanta and Boston.网约车费用受到新冠疫情的影响吗?亚特兰大和波士顿的实证分析。
Transportation (Amst). 2022 Nov 10:1-32. doi: 10.1007/s11116-022-10349-x.
5
Beyond the dichotomy: How ride-hailing competes with and complements public transport.超越二分法:网约车如何与公共交通竞争和互补。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 14;17(1):e0262496. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262496. eCollection 2022.
6
How Does Ride-Hailing Influence Individual Mode Choice? An Examination Using Longitudinal Trip Data from the Seattle Region.网约车如何影响个人出行方式选择?基于西雅图地区纵向出行数据的研究
Transp Res Rec. 2022 Mar;2676(3):621-633. doi: 10.1177/03611981211055669. Epub 2021 Nov 7.
7
The implications of ridehailing for risky driving and road accident injuries and fatalities.网约车对危险驾驶以及道路交通事故伤亡情况的影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Jan 11;250:112793. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112793.
8
Are ride-hailing services safer than taxis? A multivariate spatial approach with accommodation of exposure uncertainty.网约车服务比出租车更安全吗?一种考虑暴露不确定性的多变量空间方法。
Accid Anal Prev. 2023 Dec;193:107281. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.107281. Epub 2023 Sep 18.
9
The job of public transport, ride-hailing and delivery drivers: Conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic and implications for a post-pandemic future.公共交通、网约车及送货司机的工作:新冠疫情期间的状况及对疫情后未来的影响。
Travel Behav Soc. 2023 Apr;31:63-77. doi: 10.1016/j.tbs.2022.11.004. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
10
Driving safety assessment for ride-hailing drivers.网约车司机的驾驶安全评估
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Jan;149:105574. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105574. Epub 2020 Jul 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding the motivational mechanisms behind the usage frequency of ride-hailing during COVID-19 pandemic.理解新冠疫情期间打车出行使用频率的动机机制。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 26;10:1097885. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1097885. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Does the Implementation of Ride-Hailing Services Affect Urban Road Safety? The Experience of Madrid.打车服务的实施是否会影响城市道路安全?马德里的经验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 5;19(5):3078. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19053078.
2
The Influence of Built Environment Factors on Elderly Pedestrian Road Safety in Cities: The Experience of Madrid.城市建成环境因素对老年人步行道路安全的影响:马德里的经验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 17;19(4):2280. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042280.
3
Analyzing Factors Associated with Fatal Road Crashes: A Machine Learning Approach.
分析致命道路碰撞事故的相关因素:一种机器学习方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 9;17(11):4111. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17114111.
4
Multidimensional prediction of work traffic crashes among Spanish professional drivers in cargo and passenger transportation.西班牙货运和客运专业司机工作中交通事故的多维度预测
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2022 Mar;28(1):20-27. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2020.1732102. Epub 2020 Apr 10.
5
The implications of ridehailing for risky driving and road accident injuries and fatalities.网约车对危险驾驶以及道路交通事故伤亡情况的影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Jan 11;250:112793. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112793.
6
A review of spatial approaches in road safety.道路安全空间方法综述。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Feb;135:105323. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.105323. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
7
Psychosocial Work Factors, Job Stress and Strain at the Wheel: Validation of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ) in Professional Drivers.心理社会工作因素、驾驶时的工作压力与紧张感:哥本哈根心理社会问卷(COPSOQ)在职业驾驶员中的验证
Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 2;10:1531. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01531. eCollection 2019.
8
Estimating effects of Uber ride-sharing service on road traffic-related deaths in South Africa: a quasi-experimental study.估算优步拼车服务对南非道路交通相关死亡人数的影响:一项准实验研究。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2019 Mar;73(3):263-271. doi: 10.1136/jech-2018-211006. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
9
What are the factors that contribute to road accidents? An assessment of law enforcement views, ordinary drivers' opinions, and road accident records.导致道路交通事故的因素有哪些?执法观点、普通驾驶员意见和道路交通事故记录评估。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Jun;115:11-24. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.02.025. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
10
Ridesharing and Motor Vehicle Crashes in 4 US Cities: An Interrupted Time-Series Analysis.4 个美国城市的共乘和机动车事故:一项中断时间序列分析。
Am J Epidemiol. 2018 Feb 1;187(2):224-232. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx233.