• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“专家劝导”可降低对含糖食品的支付意愿。

"Expert persuasion" can decrease willingness to pay for sugar-containing food.

作者信息

Ntoumanis Ioannis, Panidi Ksenia, Grebenschikova Yaroslava, Shestakova Anna N, Kosonogov Vladimir, Jääskeläinen Iiro P, Kadieva Dzerassa, Baran Sofia, Klucharev Vasily

机构信息

International Laboratory of Social Neurobiology, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, HSE University, Moscow, Russia.

Department of Psychology, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, HSE University, Moscow, Russia.

出版信息

Front Nutr. 2022 Jul 28;9:926875. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.926875. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fnut.2022.926875
PMID:35967796
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9366858/
Abstract

Recent studies have revealed types of eating nudges that can steer consumers toward choosing healthier options. However, most of the previously studied interventions target individual decisions and are not directed to changing consumers' underlying perception of unhealthy food. Here, we investigate how a healthy eating call-first-person narrative by a health expert-affects individuals' willingness to pay (WTP) for sugar-free and sugar-containing food products. Participants performed two blocks of a bidding task, in which they had to bid on sweets labeled either as "sugar- free" or as "sugar-containing." In-between the two blocks, half of the participants listened to a narrative by a dietary specialist emphasizing the health risks of sugar consumption, whereas the remaining participants listened to a control narrative irrelevant to food choices. We demonstrate that the health expert's narrative decreased individuals' WTP for sugar-containing food, but did not modulate their WTP for sugar- free food. Overall, our findings confirm that consumers may conform to healthy eating calls by rather devaluating unhealthy food products than by increasing the value of healthy ones. This paves the way for an avenue of innovative marketing strategies to support individuals in their food choices.

摘要

最近的研究揭示了一些饮食助推类型,这些类型可以引导消费者选择更健康的选项。然而,大多数先前研究的干预措施针对的是个体决策,而非旨在改变消费者对不健康食品的潜在认知。在此,我们研究健康专家的第一人称叙述——关于健康饮食的呼吁——如何影响个体对无糖和含糖食品的支付意愿(WTP)。参与者进行了两个阶段的投标任务,在任务中他们必须对标记为“无糖”或“含糖”的糖果进行投标。在两个阶段之间,一半的参与者听取了一位饮食专家强调糖消费健康风险的叙述,而其余参与者听取了与食物选择无关的对照叙述。我们证明,健康专家的叙述降低了个体对含糖食品的支付意愿,但并未调节他们对无糖食品的支付意愿。总体而言,我们的研究结果证实,消费者可能通过贬低不健康食品而非提高健康食品的价值来顺应健康饮食的呼吁。这为支持个体进行食物选择的创新营销策略开辟了一条道路。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7859/9366858/73ac373fc775/fnut-09-926875-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7859/9366858/cd3292611ee1/fnut-09-926875-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7859/9366858/16724ecb2991/fnut-09-926875-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7859/9366858/73ac373fc775/fnut-09-926875-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7859/9366858/cd3292611ee1/fnut-09-926875-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7859/9366858/16724ecb2991/fnut-09-926875-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7859/9366858/73ac373fc775/fnut-09-926875-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
"Expert persuasion" can decrease willingness to pay for sugar-containing food.“专家劝导”可降低对含糖食品的支付意愿。
Front Nutr. 2022 Jul 28;9:926875. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.926875. eCollection 2022.
2
Neural mechanisms of expert persuasion on willingness to pay for sugar.专家对糖的支付意愿进行说服的神经机制。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2023 Mar 13;17:1147140. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2023.1147140. eCollection 2023.
3
Consumers' willingness to pay for nutritional claims fighting the obesity epidemic: the case of reduced-fat and low salt cheese in Spain.消费者为对抗肥胖流行的营养声明支付意愿:以西班牙低脂低盐奶酪为例
Public Health. 2016 Jun;135:83-90. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2016.02.004. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
4
Deciphering the neural responses to a naturalistic persuasive message.解读自然说服信息的神经反应。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Oct 22;121(43):e2401317121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2401317121. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
5
How Sugar Labeling Affects Consumer Sugar Reduction: A Case of Sucrose Grade Labels in China.食糖标签如何影响消费者减少食糖摄入:以中国蔗糖等级标签为例
Foods. 2024 Jun 8;13(12):1803. doi: 10.3390/foods13121803.
6
Impact of Nutritional Information on Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Meat Products in Traditional Wet Markets of Taiwan.营养信息对台湾传统湿货市场消费者购买肉类产品支付意愿的影响
Foods. 2020 Aug 9;9(8):1086. doi: 10.3390/foods9081086.
7
Differences in willingness to pay for various types of carbon-labeled products: A dynamic perspective.不同类型碳标签产品的支付意愿差异:动态视角。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Nov;370:122936. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122936. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
8
Consumers' Preferences and Willingness to Pay for Fish Products with Health and Environmental Labels: Evidence from Five European Countries.消费者对带有健康和环境标签的鱼类产品的偏好和支付意愿:来自五个欧洲国家的证据。
Nutrients. 2020 Aug 31;12(9):2650. doi: 10.3390/nu12092650.
9
Meta-analysis of consumers' willingness to pay for sustainable food products.消费者对可持续食品支付意愿的元分析
Appetite. 2021 Aug 1;163:105239. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105239. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
10
Consumers' willingness to buy and willingness to pay for fair trade food: The influence of consciousness for fair consumption, environmental concern, trust and innovativeness.消费者对公平贸易食品的购买意愿和支付意愿:公平消费意识、环境关注、信任和创新性的影响。
Food Res Int. 2019 Jun;120:141-147. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.02.018. Epub 2019 Feb 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Deciphering the neural responses to a naturalistic persuasive message.解读自然说服信息的神经反应。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Oct 22;121(43):e2401317121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2401317121. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
2
Neural mechanisms of expert persuasion on willingness to pay for sugar.专家对糖的支付意愿进行说服的神经机制。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2023 Mar 13;17:1147140. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2023.1147140. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of Induced Moods, Sensation Seeking, and Emotional Contagion on Economic Decisions Under Risk.诱导情绪、寻求刺激和情绪感染对风险下经济决策的影响。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 5;12:796016. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.796016. eCollection 2021.
2
Who accepts nudges? nudge acceptability from a self-regulation perspective.谁接受助推?从自我调节的角度看助推的可接受性。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 3;16(12):e0260531. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260531. eCollection 2021.
3
The effectiveness of nudging interventions to promote healthy eating choices: A systematic review and an intervention among Italian university students.
推动促进健康饮食选择的干预措施的有效性:系统评价和意大利大学生干预。
Appetite. 2022 Jan 1;168:105662. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105662. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
4
Effects of Statistical and Narrative Health Claims on Consumer Food Product Evaluation.统计性和叙述性健康声明对消费者食品评估的影响。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 11;11:541716. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.541716. eCollection 2020.
5
The Association Between Personality Traits and Dietary Choices: A Systematic Review.人格特质与饮食选择的关系:系统综述。
Adv Nutr. 2021 Jul 30;12(4):1149-1159. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmaa166.
6
Conceptual Models of Food Choice: Influential Factors Related to Foods, Individual Differences, and Society.食物选择的概念模型:与食物、个体差异和社会相关的影响因素
Foods. 2020 Dec 18;9(12):1898. doi: 10.3390/foods9121898.
7
Promoting Resilience to Food Commercials Decreases Susceptibility to Unhealthy Food Decision-Making.增强对食品广告的抵抗力可降低做出不健康食品决策的易感性。
Front Psychol. 2020 Dec 2;11:599663. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.599663. eCollection 2020.
8
Extrinsic Factors Underlying Food Valuation in the Human Brain.人类大脑中食物估值的外在因素
Front Behav Neurosci. 2020 Jul 24;14:131. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2020.00131. eCollection 2020.
9
Experts, peers, or celebrities? The role of different social endorsers on children's fruit choice.专家、同龄人还是名人?不同社会推荐者对儿童水果选择的影响。
Appetite. 2020 Dec 1;155:104821. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2020.104821. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
10
Neural Processing of Narratives: From Individual Processing to Viral Propagation.叙事的神经处理:从个体处理到病毒式传播
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Jun 26;14:253. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00253. eCollection 2020.