University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, United Kingdom.
University of Birmingham, Edgbaston Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom.
Vaccine. 2022 Sep 2;40(37):5407-5412. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.07.053. Epub 2022 Aug 13.
The present case study describes a co-produced and theoretically informed workshop wherein messages were co-designed to increase the uptake of future COVID-19 vaccines in the United Kingdom. Co-design can enhance the legitimacy and effectiveness of public interventions, but many researchers, service providers, and policymakers may be uncertain where to start. This demonstrative example applies behavioural science and design thinking theory, illustrating how others can integrate theoretically informed co-design into similar and more complex projects efficiently. The workshop brought together members of the public, immunisers, and public health specialists. A narrative analysis was conducted to identify themes related to vaccine hesitancy. The workshop's supporting materials are made available as supplemental materials, which can be modified for future workshops. The discussion encourages additional workshops to be conducted, including diverse members of the public, to co-design novel solutions to improve public health more generally.
本案例研究描述了一个共同设计和理论指导的研讨会，其中共同设计了信息以提高未来在英国的 COVID-19 疫苗接种率。共同设计可以提高公共干预措施的合法性和有效性，但许多研究人员、服务提供者和政策制定者可能不确定从哪里开始。这个示范例子应用了行为科学和设计思维理论，说明了其他人如何有效地将基于理论的共同设计融入类似的更复杂的项目中。该研讨会汇集了公众成员、免疫人员和公共卫生专家。进行了叙述性分析以确定与疫苗犹豫相关的主题。研讨会的支持材料作为补充材料提供，可以为未来的研讨会进行修改。讨论鼓励开展更多的研讨会，包括更多样化的公众成员，共同设计新颖的解决方案，以更普遍地改善公共卫生。
