• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提高 COVID-19 疫苗接种率:哥伦比亚国家移动医疗干预措施的信息共同设计过程。

Improving COVID-19 vaccine uptake: a message co-design process for a national mHealth intervention in Colombia.

机构信息

IMEK Centro de Investigación en Mercadeo & Desarrollo, Santiago de Cali, Colombia.

Instituto de Salud Pública, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia.

出版信息

Glob Health Action. 2023 Dec 31;16(1):2242670. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2023.2242670.

DOI:10.1080/16549716.2023.2242670
PMID:37643136
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10467523/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

COVID-19 vaccination is a global priority. Latin American countries have some of the highest COVID-19 death rates worldwide with vaccination hampered by a variety of reasons, including mis- and disinformation, vaccine hesitancy, and vaccine supply constraints. Addressing vaccine hesitancy through effective messages has been found to help increase vaccine uptake. Participatory processes could be used to co-design health messages for this purpose.

OBJECTIVE

This article describes the methodology used to co-design evidence-based audio messages to be deployed in a cohort of individuals through an interactive voice response (IVR) mobile phone survey intervention, aimed towards increasing vaccination uptake in an adult population in Colombia.

METHODS

Participants of the COVID-19 vaccination message co-design process included a sample of the general population of the country, representatives of the funder organisation, and research team members. The co-design process consisted of four phases: (1) formative quantitative and qualitative research, (2) message drafting based on the results of the formative research, (3) message content evaluation, and (4) evaluation of the voices to deliver the audio messages; and was informed by reflexive meetings.

RESULTS

Three categories of evidence-based audio messages were co-designed, each corresponding to an arm of the mHealth intervention: (1) factual messages, (2) narrative messages, and (3) mixed messages. An additional fourth arm with no message was proposed for control. The iterative co-design process ended with a total of 14 audio messages recorded to be deployed via the intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Co-developing health messages in response to health emergencies is possible. Adopting more context-relevant, participatory, people-centred, and reflexive multidisciplinary approaches could help develop solutions that are more responsive to the needs of populations and public health priorities. Investing resources in message co-design is deemed to have a greater potential for influencing behaviours and improving health outcomes.

摘要

背景

新冠病毒疫苗接种是全球的当务之急。拉丁美洲国家的新冠死亡率居全球前列,由于各种原因,包括错误和虚假信息、疫苗犹豫以及疫苗供应限制,这些国家的疫苗接种工作受到阻碍。通过有效的信息传递来解决疫苗犹豫问题已被证明有助于提高疫苗接种率。参与式流程可用于共同设计此类健康信息。

目的

本文介绍了一种方法,用于共同设计基于证据的音频信息,以便通过交互式语音应答(IVR)手机调查干预措施在哥伦比亚的一个人群中进行部署,旨在提高成年人群的疫苗接种率。

方法

新冠病毒疫苗信息共同设计过程的参与者包括该国一般人群的样本、资助组织的代表以及研究团队成员。共同设计过程包括四个阶段:(1)形成性定量和定性研究;(2)根据形成性研究结果起草信息;(3)信息内容评估;(4)评估传递音频信息的声音;并得到反思会议的指导。

结果

共同设计了三类基于证据的音频信息,每类对应 mHealth 干预措施的一个分支:(1)事实信息;(2)叙述信息;(3)混合信息。还提出了第四个无信息的分支作为对照。迭代的共同设计过程最终确定了总共 14 个要通过干预措施部署的音频信息。

结论

针对卫生紧急情况共同制定卫生信息是可行的。采取更具相关性、参与性、以人民为中心和反思性的多学科方法,有助于制定更能满足人群需求和公共卫生重点的解决方案。投入资源进行信息共同设计被认为更有潜力影响行为和改善健康结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/780f/10467523/6d66e022e0a4/ZGHA_A_2242670_F0003_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/780f/10467523/b45ff9487197/ZGHA_A_2242670_F0001_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/780f/10467523/4259db2ecc87/ZGHA_A_2242670_F0002_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/780f/10467523/6d66e022e0a4/ZGHA_A_2242670_F0003_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/780f/10467523/b45ff9487197/ZGHA_A_2242670_F0001_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/780f/10467523/4259db2ecc87/ZGHA_A_2242670_F0002_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/780f/10467523/6d66e022e0a4/ZGHA_A_2242670_F0003_B.jpg

相似文献

1
Improving COVID-19 vaccine uptake: a message co-design process for a national mHealth intervention in Colombia.提高 COVID-19 疫苗接种率:哥伦比亚国家移动医疗干预措施的信息共同设计过程。
Glob Health Action. 2023 Dec 31;16(1):2242670. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2023.2242670.
2
Development of a Theory-Based, Culturally Appropriate Message Library for Use in Interventions to Promote COVID-19 Vaccination Among African Americans: Formative Research.开发一个基于理论、适合文化背景的信息库,用于促进非裔美国人接种新冠疫苗的干预措施:形成性研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Jul 28;6(7):e38781. doi: 10.2196/38781.
3
Testing the impact of differing behavioural science informed text message content in COVID-19 vaccination invitations on vaccine uptake: A randomised clinical trial.测试在新冠疫苗接种邀请中,不同行为科学指导的短信内容对疫苗接种率的影响:一项随机临床试验。
Vaccine. 2024 Apr 19;42(11):2919-2926. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.03.059. Epub 2024 Mar 28.
4
Developing Message Strategies to Engage Racial and Ethnic Minority Groups in Digital Oral Self-Care Interventions: Participatory Co-Design Approach.制定信息策略,以促使种族和少数民族群体参与数字口腔自我护理干预:参与式协同设计方法。
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Dec 11;7:e49179. doi: 10.2196/49179.
5
Striking the right balance: co-designing the Health4Me healthy lifestyle digital health intervention with adolescents.把握正确平衡:与青少年共同设计“健康4我”健康生活方式数字健康干预措施
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Dec 7;9(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00524-4.
6
COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in Three Latin American Countries: Reasons Given for Not Becoming Vaccinated in Colombia, Ecuador, and Venezuela.拉丁美洲三个国家对新冠疫苗的犹豫态度:哥伦比亚、厄瓜多尔和委内瑞拉未接种疫苗的原因
Health Commun. 2022 Nov;37(12):1465-1475. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2022.2035943. Epub 2022 Feb 14.
7
Evaluating the relationship between moral values and vaccine hesitancy in Great Britain during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional survey.评估英国在 COVID-19 大流行期间道德价值观与疫苗犹豫之间的关系:一项横断面调查。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Sep;308:115218. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115218. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
8
Testing persuasive messages about booster doses of COVID-19 vaccines on intention to vaccinate in Australian adults: A randomised controlled trial.测试关于 COVID-19 疫苗加强针的说服性信息对澳大利亚成年人接种意愿的影响:一项随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 2;18(6):e0286799. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286799. eCollection 2023.
9
"Please Don't Send Us Spam!" A Participative, Theory-Based Methodology for Developing an mHealth Intervention.“请勿发送垃圾邮件!”一种基于参与式理论的 mHealth 干预措施开发方法。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 Aug 17;4(3):e100. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.6041.
10
Using wiki surveys to rapidly test messages promoting COVID-19 vaccination boosters and child vaccination among Philadelphia residents.利用维基调查快速测试在费城居民中推广 COVID-19 疫苗加强针和儿童疫苗接种的信息。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 23;14(1):19611. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-70554-9.

引用本文的文献

1
How has co-design been used to address vaccine hesitancy globally? A systematic review.协同设计如何在全球范围内用于解决疫苗犹豫问题?一项系统综述。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2024 Dec 31;20(1):2431380. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2431380. Epub 2024 Dec 11.
2
Informing efforts beyond tailored promotional campaigns by understanding contextual factors shaping vaccine hesitancy among equity-deserving populations in Canada: an exploratory qualitative study.在加拿大,通过了解影响公平受益人群疫苗犹豫的背景因素,开展超越定制宣传活动的信息传递工作:一项探索性定性研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2023 Oct 7;22(1):209. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-02025-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Toward co-design of an AI solution for detection of diarrheal pathogens in drinking water within resource-constrained contexts.面向在资源受限环境下共同设计用于检测饮用水中腹泻病原体的人工智能解决方案。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Aug 16;2(8):e0000918. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000918. eCollection 2022.
2
COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and its socio-demographic and emotional determinants: A multi-country cross-sectional study.COVID-19 疫苗接受度及其社会人口学和情绪决定因素:一项多国家横断面研究。
Vaccine. 2023 Jan 9;41(2):354-364. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.10.051. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
3
Revisiting COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy around the world using data from 23 countries in 2021.
重新审视 2021 年来自 23 个国家的 COVID-19 疫苗犹豫数据。
Nat Commun. 2022 Jul 1;13(1):3801. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31441-x.
4
Acceptance towards COVID-19 vaccination in Latin America and the Caribbean: A systematic review and meta-analysis.拉丁美洲和加勒比地区对 COVID-19 疫苗接种的接受度:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Travel Med Infect Dis. 2022 Sep-Oct;49:102369. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2022.102369. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
5
The Effect of Message Framing on COVID-19 Vaccination Intentions among the Younger Age Population Groups: Results from an Experimental Study in the Italian Context.信息框架对年轻人群体中新冠疫苗接种意愿的影响:意大利背景下的一项实验研究结果
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Apr 4;10(4):559. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10040559.
6
The Joint Effects of Social Norm Appeals and Fear Appeals in COVID-19 Vaccine Campaign Posters on Self-Perceived Communication Quality and Vaccination Intention.新冠疫苗宣传海报中社会规范诉求与恐惧诉求对自我感知沟通质量和接种意愿的联合影响
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 28;13:760146. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.760146. eCollection 2022.
7
COVID-19 response in Colombia: Hits and misses.哥伦比亚的新冠疫情应对措施:成败得失
Health Policy Technol. 2022 Jun;11(2):100621. doi: 10.1016/j.hlpt.2022.100621. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
8
Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines in older adults in Colombia: a retrospective, population-based study of the ESPERANZA cohort.哥伦比亚老年人中 COVID-19 疫苗的有效性:ESPERANZA 队列的回顾性、基于人群的研究。
Lancet Healthy Longev. 2022 Apr;3(4):e242-e252. doi: 10.1016/S2666-7568(22)00035-6. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
9
Health communication in and out of public health emergencies: to persuade or to inform?突发公共卫生事件中的健康传播:说服还是告知?
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Mar 5;20(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00828-z.
10
COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in Three Latin American Countries: Reasons Given for Not Becoming Vaccinated in Colombia, Ecuador, and Venezuela.拉丁美洲三个国家对新冠疫苗的犹豫态度:哥伦比亚、厄瓜多尔和委内瑞拉未接种疫苗的原因
Health Commun. 2022 Nov;37(12):1465-1475. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2022.2035943. Epub 2022 Feb 14.