Gui Si-Yu, Qiao Jian-Chao, Xu Ke-Xin, Li Ze-Lian, Chen Yue-Nan, Wu Ke-Jia, Jiang Zheng-Xuan, Hu Cheng-Yang
Department of Ophthalmology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, 678 Furong Road, Hefei, 230601, China.
Department of Clinical Medicine, The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Anhui Medical University, 81 Meishan Road, Hefei, 230032, China.
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2023 Jan;33(1):40-55. doi: 10.1038/s41370-022-00464-3. Epub 2022 Aug 15.
Emerging evidence suggests that per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are endocrine disruptors and may contribute to the etiology of diabetes.
This study aimed to systematically review the epidemiological evidence on the associations of PFAS with mortality and morbidity of diabetes and to quantitatively evaluate the summary effect estimates of the existing literature.
We searched three electronic databases for epidemiological studies concerning PFAS and diabetes published before April 1, 2022. Summary odds ratio (OR), hazard ratio (HR), or β and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were respectively calculated to evaluate the association between PFAS and diabetes using random-effects model by the exposure type, and dose-response meta-analyses were also performed when possible. We also assessed the risk of bias of the studies included and the confidence in the body of evidence.
An initial literature search identified 1969 studies, of which 22 studies were eventually included. The meta-analyses indicated that the observed statistically significant PFAS-T2DM associations were consistent in cohort studies, while the associations were almost non-significant in case-control and cross-sectional studies. Dose-response meta-analysis showed a "parabolic-shaped" association between perfluorooctanoate acid (PFOA) exposure and T2DM risk. Available evidence was rated with "low" risk of bias, and the level of evidence for PFAS and incident T2DM was considered "moderate".
Our findings suggest that PFAS exposure may increase the risk of incident T2DM, and that PFOA may exert non-monotonic dose-response effect on T2DM risk. Considering the widespread exposure, persistence, and potential for adverse health effects of PFAS, further cohort studies with improvements in expanding the sample size, adjusting the covariates, and considering different types of PFAS exposure at various doses, are needed to elucidate the putative causal associations and potential mode of action of different PFAS on diabetes.
A growing body of evidence suggests that per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are endocrine disruptors and may contribute to the development of diabetes. However, epidemiological evidence on the associations of PFAS and diabetes is inconsistent. We performed this comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to quantitatively synthesize the evidence. The findings of this study suggest that exposure to PFAS may increase diabetes risk among the general population. Reduced exposure to these "forever and everywhere chemicals" may be an important preventative approach to reducing the risk of diabetes across the population.
新出现的证据表明,全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)是内分泌干扰物,可能与糖尿病的病因有关。
本研究旨在系统回顾关于PFAS与糖尿病死亡率和发病率之间关联的流行病学证据,并定量评估现有文献的汇总效应估计值。
我们在三个电子数据库中检索了2022年4月1日前发表的有关PFAS与糖尿病的流行病学研究。分别计算汇总比值比(OR)、风险比(HR)或β及其95%置信区间(CI),采用随机效应模型按暴露类型评估PFAS与糖尿病之间的关联,并在可能的情况下进行剂量反应荟萃分析。我们还评估了纳入研究的偏倚风险和证据的可信度。
初步文献检索确定了1969项研究,最终纳入22项研究。荟萃分析表明,在队列研究中观察到的PFAS与2型糖尿病之间具有统计学意义的关联是一致的,而在病例对照研究和横断面研究中,这种关联几乎无统计学意义。剂量反应荟萃分析显示,全氟辛酸(PFOA)暴露与2型糖尿病风险之间存在“抛物线形”关联。现有证据的偏倚风险被评为“低”,PFAS与新发2型糖尿病的证据水平被认为是“中等”。
我们的研究结果表明,PFAS暴露可能会增加新发2型糖尿病的风险,并且PFOA可能对2型糖尿病风险产生非单调剂量反应效应。考虑到PFAS的广泛暴露、持久性和对健康的潜在不利影响,需要进一步开展队列研究,扩大样本量、调整协变量并考虑不同剂量的不同类型PFAS暴露,以阐明不同PFAS与糖尿病之间的假定因果关联和潜在作用模式。
越来越多的证据表明,全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)是内分泌干扰物,可能导致糖尿病的发生。然而,关于PFAS与糖尿病关联的流行病学证据并不一致。我们进行了这项全面的系统综述和荟萃分析,以定量综合证据。本研究结果表明,PFAS暴露可能会增加普通人群患糖尿病的风险。减少接触这些“无处不在的永久性化学物质”可能是降低人群糖尿病风险的重要预防措施。