• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国环境脆弱地区农民土地流转、主观幸福感及参与农业环境计划的影响因素

Influencing factors of farmers' land transfer, subjective well-being, and participation in agri-environment schemes in environmentally fragile areas of China.

作者信息

Hu Guangyin, Wang Jing, Fahad Shah, Li Jinxing

机构信息

College of Economics and Management, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, 712100, Shaanxi, China.

School of Economics and Management, Leshan Normal University, Leshan, 614000, Sichuan, China.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jan;30(2):4448-4461. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-22537-4. Epub 2022 Aug 15.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-022-22537-4
PMID:35971053
Abstract

One of the purposes of agri-environment schemes (AESs) is to persuade farmers to make good environmental contributions. Understanding the determinants of farmer behavior and the decisions they make regarding AESs is crucial because it helps policymakers create schemes with a broader reach and a higher likelihood of achieving environmental goals. This paper aims to explore the impacts of land transfer, farmers' subjective well-being, and participation in AESs in environmentally fragile areas of China by using data of 6840 sampled farmers obtained from China Family Panel Studies (CFPS). A relatively novel approach of ordinary least square (OLS), the ordered probit model approach, and the mediation effect model is used to assess the association between the land transfer mechanism, subjective well-being, and participation in AESs. The model outcomes indicate that land transfer has a considerable influence on AES involvement and that it can boost farmers' subjective well-being. The findings of our study also indicate that the marginal effect of land transfer on the subjective well-being of nonpoor households is greater than that of poor households, and the impact degree of land transfer on the subjective well-being of farmers reveals a weakening trend from east to west regions. Local conditions should be taken as guidance to effectively coordinate the regional resource allocation.

摘要

农业环境计划(AESs)的目的之一是说服农民做出良好的环境贡献。了解农民行为的决定因素以及他们对农业环境计划所做的决策至关重要,因为这有助于政策制定者制定覆盖面更广、实现环境目标可能性更高的计划。本文旨在利用从中国家庭追踪调查(CFPS)获得的6840个抽样农户的数据,探讨土地流转、农民主观幸福感以及参与农业环境计划对中国环境脆弱地区的影响。采用一种相对新颖的普通最小二乘法(OLS)、有序概率模型方法和中介效应模型来评估土地流转机制、主观幸福感与参与农业环境计划之间的关联。模型结果表明,土地流转对参与农业环境计划有相当大的影响,并且可以提高农民的主观幸福感。我们的研究结果还表明,土地流转对非贫困家庭主观幸福感的边际效应大于贫困家庭,土地流转对农民主观幸福感的影响程度呈现出从东部地区到西部地区逐渐减弱的趋势。应以当地实际情况为指导,有效协调区域资源配置。

相似文献

1
Influencing factors of farmers' land transfer, subjective well-being, and participation in agri-environment schemes in environmentally fragile areas of China.中国环境脆弱地区农民土地流转、主观幸福感及参与农业环境计划的影响因素
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jan;30(2):4448-4461. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-22537-4. Epub 2022 Aug 15.
2
Factors influencing farmer and resident willingness to adopt an agri-environmental scheme in Israel.影响以色列农民和居民采纳农业环境计划意愿的因素。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Jan 15;302(Pt A):114066. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114066. Epub 2021 Nov 8.
3
The impact of rural e-commerce participation on farmers' entrepreneurial behavior: Evidence based on CFPS data in China.农村电子商务参与对农民创业行为的影响:基于中国 CFPS 数据的证据。
PLoS One. 2024 May 9;19(5):e0300418. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300418. eCollection 2024.
4
A study on the influencing factors of rural land transfer willingness in different terrain areas--Based on the questionnaire survey data of Anhui Province and Qinghai Province, China.不同地形地区农村土地流转意愿的影响因素研究——基于中国安徽省和青海省的问卷调查数据。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 7;19(6):e0303078. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303078. eCollection 2024.
5
Gap between Willingness and Behaviors: Understanding the Consistency of Farmers' Green Production in Hainan, China.意愿与行为之间的差距:理解中国海南农民绿色生产的一致性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 9;19(18):11351. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811351.
6
Analysis of the ecological conservation behavior of farmers in payment for ecosystem service programs in eco-environmentally fragile areas using social psychology models.运用社会心理学模型分析生态环境脆弱地区生态服务付费项目中农民的生态保护行为。
Sci Total Environ. 2016 Apr 15;550:382-390. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.152. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
7
Land Tenure and Cotton Farmers' Land Improvement: Evidence from State-Owned Farms in Xinjiang, China.土地权属与棉花种植户土地改良——来自中国新疆国有农场的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 23;19(1):117. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010117.
8
Possibilities and requirements for introducing agri-environment measures in land consolidation projects in China, evidence from ecosystem services and farmers' attitudes.在中国土地整治项目中引入农业环境措施的可能性和要求,基于生态系统服务和农民态度的证据。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Feb 10;650(Pt 2):3145-3155. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.051. Epub 2018 Oct 6.
9
Internet use and land transfer in: empirical evidence from China's rural panel data.互联网使用与土地流转:来自中国农村面板数据的经验证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Dec;29(58):88288-88301. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-21917-0. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
10
Evaluating the Impact of Institutional Performance and Government Trust on Farmers' Subjective Well-Being: A Case of Urban-Rural Welfare Gap Perception and Family Economic Status in Shaanxi, Sichuan and Anhui, China.评价制度绩效和政府信任对农民主观幸福感的影响——以中国陕西、四川和安徽的城乡福利差距感知和家庭经济状况为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 30;20(1):710. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010710.

引用本文的文献

1
Heterogeneous and short-term effects of a changing climate on farmers' labor allocation: An empirical analysis of China.气候变化对农民劳动力分配的异质和短期影响:来自中国的实证分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 26;19(7):e0306260. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306260. eCollection 2024.
2
A study evaluating the extrinsic and intrinsic determinants of farmers' adoption of climate change adaptation strategies: A novel approach for improving farmers' health.一项评估农民采用气候变化适应策略的外在和内在决定因素的研究:一种改善农民健康的新方法。
One Health. 2023 Feb 8;16:100501. doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2023.100501. eCollection 2023 Jun.
3
Spatial Effects of Digital Transformation, PM Exposure, Economic Growth and Technological Innovation Nexus: PM Concentrations in China during 2010-2020.
数字转型、PM 暴露、经济增长和技术创新关系的空间效应:2010-2020 年中国 PM 浓度。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 31;20(3):2550. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032550.
4
A study assessing the impact of income relative deprivation and cooperative membership on rural residents' health: A pathway towards improving the health status of rural residents.一项评估收入相对剥夺和合作社成员身份对农村居民健康影响的研究:改善农村居民健康状况的途径。
One Health. 2023 Jan 28;16:100494. doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2023.100494. eCollection 2023 Jun.
5
Acceptance Intention and Behavioral Response to Soil-Testing Formula Fertilization Technology: An Empirical Study of Agricultural Land in Shaanxi Province.接受意愿与土壤测试配方施肥技术的行为反应:陕西省农用地的实证研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 4;20(2):951. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20020951.
6
Evaluating the Impact of Institutional Performance and Government Trust on Farmers' Subjective Well-Being: A Case of Urban-Rural Welfare Gap Perception and Family Economic Status in Shaanxi, Sichuan and Anhui, China.评价制度绩效和政府信任对农民主观幸福感的影响——以中国陕西、四川和安徽的城乡福利差距感知和家庭经济状况为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 30;20(1):710. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010710.
7
A pathway towards the development and evolution of consumer behavior: Policy directions for sustainable development and improvement of nutrition.消费者行为发展与演变的路径:可持续发展及营养改善的政策方向
Front Nutr. 2022 Dec 2;9:1066444. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.1066444. eCollection 2022.
8
Rural migration, governance, and public health nexus: Implications for economic development.农村迁移、治理与公共卫生的关系:对经济发展的影响。
Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 11;10:1002216. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1002216. eCollection 2022.