• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

特定的低能量骨盆骨折特征对死亡率的影响。

The impact of specific fracture characteristics of low-energy fractures of the pelvis on mortality.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic and Traumatology Surgery, University Hospital Basel, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.

University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

BMC Geriatr. 2022 Aug 15;22(1):669. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03223-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12877-022-03223-z
PMID:35971065
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9377136/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pelvic fractures in older patients are associated with relevant morbidity and mortality. Both might be determined by fracture morphology and/or patient characteristics. The aim of this project is to investigate the prognostic value of specific fracture characteristics with respect to overall survival and to compare it with an established classification system.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of patients ≥ 60 years, treated conservatively for a CT-scan verified, low-energy pelvic ring fracture between August 2006 and December 2018. Survival data was available from patients' charts and cantonal or national registries. The prognostic value of fracture characteristic describing the anterior and posterior involvement of the pelvic ring was investigated. This analysis was repeated after patients were stratified into a high-risk vs a low-risk group according to patient characteristic (age, gender, comorbidities, mobility, living situation). This allowed to assess the impact of the different fracture morphologies on mortality in fit vs. frail senior patients separately.

RESULTS

Overall, 428 patients (83.4% female) with a mean age of 83.7 years were included. Two thirds of patients were still living in their home and mobile without walking aid at baseline. In-hospital mortality was 0.7%, overall, one-year mortality 16.9%. An independent and significant association of age, gender and comorbidities to overall survival was found. Further, the occurrence of a horizontal sacral fracture as well as a ventral comminution or dislocation was associated with an increased mortality. The effect of a horizontal sacral fracture was more accentuated in low-risk patients while the ventral fracture components showed a larger effect on survival in high-risk patients.

CONCLUSION

Specific fracture characteristics may indicate a higher risk of mortality in conservatively treated patients with a low-energy pelvic ring fracture. Hence, they should be taken into account in future treatment algorithms and decisions on patient management.

摘要

背景

老年患者的骨盆骨折与相关发病率和死亡率有关。这两者都可能由骨折形态和/或患者特征决定。本项目旨在研究特定骨折特征对总体生存率的预测价值,并将其与既定的分类系统进行比较。

方法

回顾性分析 2006 年 8 月至 2018 年 12 月期间接受 CT 扫描证实的低能量骨盆环骨折保守治疗的≥60 岁患者。通过患者病历和州或国家登记处获得生存数据。研究了描述骨盆环前后受累的骨折特征对预后的影响。根据患者特征(年龄、性别、合并症、活动能力、居住情况)将患者分层为高风险组和低风险组后,重复了该分析。这允许分别评估不同骨折形态对健康和体弱老年患者死亡率的影响。

结果

总共纳入了 428 名(83.4%为女性)平均年龄为 83.7 岁的患者。三分之二的患者在基线时仍居住在自己家中且行动自如,无需使用助行器。院内死亡率为 0.7%,总体而言,一年死亡率为 16.9%。年龄、性别和合并症与总体生存率独立且显著相关。此外,发生水平骶骨骨折以及前侧粉碎或脱位与死亡率增加相关。低风险患者中水平骶骨骨折的影响更为明显,而高风险患者中前侧骨折成分对生存率的影响更大。

结论

特定的骨折特征可能表明低能量骨盆环骨折保守治疗患者的死亡率较高。因此,在未来的治疗方案和患者管理决策中应考虑这些特征。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb33/9377136/813977f18b78/12877_2022_3223_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb33/9377136/ceed14199fde/12877_2022_3223_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb33/9377136/cecef2ebfa0f/12877_2022_3223_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb33/9377136/12c39d455cea/12877_2022_3223_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb33/9377136/2ea1c837ac54/12877_2022_3223_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb33/9377136/4943c59dabd6/12877_2022_3223_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb33/9377136/813977f18b78/12877_2022_3223_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb33/9377136/ceed14199fde/12877_2022_3223_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb33/9377136/cecef2ebfa0f/12877_2022_3223_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb33/9377136/12c39d455cea/12877_2022_3223_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb33/9377136/2ea1c837ac54/12877_2022_3223_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb33/9377136/4943c59dabd6/12877_2022_3223_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb33/9377136/813977f18b78/12877_2022_3223_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The impact of specific fracture characteristics of low-energy fractures of the pelvis on mortality.特定的低能量骨盆骨折特征对死亡率的影响。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Aug 15;22(1):669. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03223-z.
2
Focusing on individual morphological fracture characteristics of pelvic ring fractures in elderly patients can support clinical decision making.关注老年患者骨盆环骨折的个体形态学骨折特征可以为临床决策提供支持。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Jun 30;22(1):543. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03222-0.
3
Posterior pelvic ring involvement detected with CT taken within a week of admission in acute fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) does not predict failure of conservative treatment: a retrospective cohort study.入院后一周内 CT 检查发现的后骨盆环受累并不预示急性脆性骨盆骨折 (FFP) 的保守治疗失败:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Apr 22;24(1):320. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06439-1.
4
Short-term mobility in low-energy pelvic ring fractures after conservative treatment.保守治疗后低能量骨盆环骨折的短期移动能力。
Injury. 2024 Nov;55(11):111770. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111770. Epub 2024 Aug 3.
5
What constitutes a Young and Burgess lateral compression-I (OTA 61-B2) pelvic ring disruption? A description of computed tomography-based fracture anatomy and associated injuries.什么构成了Young和Burgess侧方压缩-I型(OTA 61-B2)骨盆环损伤?基于计算机断层扫描的骨折解剖结构及相关损伤的描述。
J Orthop Trauma. 2009 Jan;23(1):16-21. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31818f8a81.
6
[Sacral fractures in geriatric patients].[老年患者的骶骨骨折]
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2022 Jul;55(4):331-341. doi: 10.1007/s00391-022-02061-3. Epub 2022 Jun 1.
7
Pelvic X-ray misses out on detecting sacral fractures in the elderly - Importance of CT imaging in blunt pelvic trauma.骨盆X光检查无法检测出老年人的骶骨骨折——CT成像在钝性骨盆创伤中的重要性。
Injury. 2016 Mar;47(3):707-10. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.01.027. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
8
Good functional outcome in patients suffering fragility fractures of the pelvis treated with percutaneous screw stabilisation: Assessment of complications and factors influencing failure.经皮螺钉固定治疗骨盆脆性骨折患者的良好功能预后:并发症评估及影响失败的因素
Injury. 2017 Dec;48(12):2717-2723. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.11.002. Epub 2017 Nov 4.
9
Midline sagittal sacral fractures in anterior-posterior compression pelvic ring injuries.前后挤压型骨盆环损伤中的中线矢状位骶骨骨折
J Orthop Trauma. 2003 Jan;17(1):32-7. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200301000-00005.
10
Clinical study of vacuum phenomenon in closed pelvic fracture.闭合性骨盆骨折中真空现象的临床研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Mar 25;18(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03674-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Comprehensive Management of Different Types of Pelvic Fractures Through Multiple Disciplines: A Case Series.多学科综合管理不同类型骨盆骨折:病例系列
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 7;14(15):5593. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155593.
2
Pelvic Fractures in Adults and the Importance of Associated Injuries-A Current Multi-Disciplinary Approach.成人骨盆骨折及相关损伤的重要性——当前的多学科方法
Clin Pract. 2025 Jul 11;15(7):130. doi: 10.3390/clinpract15070130.
3
Percutaneous hollow nail internal fixation treatment for fractures of the pubic symphysis and its adjacent areas.

本文引用的文献

1
Midterm follow-up of elderly patients with fragility fractures of the pelvis: A prospective cohort-study comparing operative and non-operative treatment according to a therapeutic algorithm.老年骨盆脆弱性骨折患者的中期随访:根据治疗算法比较手术和非手术治疗的前瞻性队列研究。
Injury. 2022 Feb;53(2):496-505. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.09.044. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
2
Pelvic Fragility Fractures: An Opportunity to Improve the Undertreatment of Osteoporosis.骨盆脆弱性骨折:改善骨质疏松症治疗不足的机会。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 Feb 3;103(3):213-218. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.00738.
3
Mobility and mortality of 340 patients with fragility fracture of the pelvis.
经皮空心钉内固定治疗耻骨联合及其邻近区域骨折
Front Surg. 2024 Oct 29;11:1400834. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1400834. eCollection 2024.
4
Epidemiological characteristics and impact of sepsis on survival after osteoporotic pelvic fracture in Austria.奥地利骨质疏松性骨盆骨折后脓毒症的流行病学特征及对生存的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 18;14(1):24531. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-75568-x.
5
Clinical Associated Factors of Tile B/C Type of Pelvic Ring Fractures; a Retrospective Cross-sectional study.Tile B/C型骨盆环骨折的临床相关因素;一项回顾性横断面研究。
Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2024 May 12;12(1):e49. doi: 10.22037/aaem.v12i1.2243. eCollection 2024.
6
Adverse outcomes following pelvic fracture: the critical role of frailty.骨盆骨折后的不良结局:脆弱性的关键作用。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 Dec;49(6):2623-2631. doi: 10.1007/s00068-023-02355-0. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
7
[Sacral H-shaped fractures between traumatic, insufficiency and fatigue fractures : Similarities, differences and controversies].[创伤性、骨质疏松性和疲劳性骨折中的骶骨H形骨折:异同与争议]
Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb). 2023 Nov;126(11):863-871. doi: 10.1007/s00113-023-01346-5. Epub 2023 Jul 4.
340 例骨盆脆性骨折患者的活动能力和死亡率。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021 Feb;47(1):29-36. doi: 10.1007/s00068-020-01481-3. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
4
An alphanumeric classification of osteoporotic pelvic ring injuries.骨质疏松性骨盆环损伤的字母数字分类。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 May;141(5):861-869. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03546-9. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
5
The one-year mortality rate in elderly patients with osteoporotic fractures of the pelvis.老年骨质疏松性骨盆骨折患者一年死亡率。
Arch Osteoporos. 2020 Feb 20;15(1):15. doi: 10.1007/s11657-020-0689-8.
6
Early Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment of Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis: A Propensity-Matched Multicenter Study.早期手术与非手术治疗骨盆脆弱性骨折:一项倾向匹配的多中心研究。
J Orthop Trauma. 2019 Nov;33(11):e410-e415. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001584.
7
Effectiveness of surgical fixation for lateral compression type one (LC-1) fragility fractures of the pelvis: a systematic review.手术固定治疗外侧挤压型 1 型(LC-1)骨盆脆性骨折的疗效:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 19;9(5):e024737. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024737.
8
Risk of institutionalization following fragility fractures in older people.老年人脆性骨折后住院风险。
Osteoporos Int. 2019 Jul;30(7):1363-1370. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-04922-x. Epub 2019 Mar 15.
9
Mid-term follow-up after surgical treatment of fragility fractures of the pelvis.骨盆脆性骨折手术治疗后的中期随访
Injury. 2018 Nov;49(11):2032-2035. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.09.017. Epub 2018 Sep 11.
10
Osteoporotic Pelvic Fractures.骨质疏松性骨盆骨折。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2018 Feb 2;115(5):70-80. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2018.0070.