Suppr超能文献

闭合性骨盆骨折中真空现象的临床研究。

Clinical study of vacuum phenomenon in closed pelvic fracture.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Lishui Municipal Central Hospital, Lishui, 323000, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Mar 25;18(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03674-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to examine the prevalence and clinical findings of the vacuum phenomenon (VP) in closed pelvic fractures.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 352 patients with closed pelvic fractures who presented to our institution from January 2017 to December 2020. Pelvic fractures were diagnosed by plain radiography and computed tomography (CT). The default "bone window" was used for inspection in the cross section. Electronic medical records were consulted by two orthopedic physicians to obtain patient information. The VP of pelvic fracture, fracture classification, injury mechanism, and image data were evaluated, and the demographic parameter data were statistically analyzed. The follow-up time was 12-18 months.

RESULTS

Among them, 169 were males and 183 were females with ages ranging from 3 to 100 years, with an average of 49.6 ± 19.3 years. VP in pelvic fractures was detected by CT in 109 (31%) of the 352 patients with pelvic fractures. Patients were divided into the high-energy trauma group (278 cases) and fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) group (74 cases) according to the injury mechanism. In the high-energy trauma group, 227 cases were treated surgically and 201 cases had bony healing. The healing time was 9.8 ± 5.3 weeks. In the FFP group, 54 cases were treated surgically and 49 cases had bone healing. The healing time was 9.3 ± 3.8 weeks. Fractures progressed in nine patients. VP was mostly located in the sacroiliac joint in our study.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of VP in pelvic fractures is statistically high and is affected by many factors, such as examination technique, joint position, population composition, etc. Therefore, the VP is not a reliable sign of pelvic injury. Clinically, we need to determine the nature of VP in conjunction with gas patterns, laboratory tests, history, and physical examination.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在探讨闭合性骨盆骨折中真空现象(VP)的发生率和临床特征。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 2017 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间我院收治的 352 例闭合性骨盆骨折患者。骨盆骨折通过 X 线和平扫 CT 诊断。横断面采用默认的“骨窗”进行检查。通过两名骨科医生查阅电子病历,获取患者信息。评估骨盆骨折的 VP、骨折分类、损伤机制和影像学数据,并对人口统计学参数数据进行统计学分析。随访时间为 12-18 个月。

结果

其中男性 169 例,女性 183 例,年龄 3-100 岁,平均 49.6±19.3 岁。352 例骨盆骨折患者中,109 例(31%)通过 CT 检测到骨盆骨折 VP。根据损伤机制,患者分为高能创伤组(278 例)和骨盆脆性骨折组(FFP 组,74 例)。在高能创伤组中,227 例患者接受了手术治疗,201 例患者有骨愈合。愈合时间为 9.8±5.3 周。在 FFP 组中,54 例患者接受了手术治疗,49 例患者有骨愈合。愈合时间为 9.3±3.8 周。9 例患者骨折进展。本研究中 VP 主要位于骶髂关节。

结论

骨盆骨折中 VP 的发生率较高,受检查技术、关节位置、人口构成等多种因素影响。因此,VP 不是骨盆损伤的可靠征象。临床上,我们需要结合气体形态、实验室检查、病史和体格检查来确定 VP 的性质。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验