• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜经腹腹膜前(TAPP)腹股沟疝修补术中采用缝线固定与钉合固定补片患者的早期结局比较。

Comparison of Early Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Suture Fixation Versus Tack Fixation of Mesh in Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) Repair of Inguinal Hernia.

作者信息

Aziz Sarmad S, Jan ZakaUllah, Ijaz Nadeem, Zarin Mohammad, Toru Hamza K

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar, PAK.

出版信息

Cureus. 2022 Jul 13;14(7):e26821. doi: 10.7759/cureus.26821. eCollection 2022 Jul.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.26821
PMID:35971369
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9372384/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The advent of laparoscopic techniques in repairing inguinal hernia has significantly improved outcomes of inguinal hernia surgery. However, acute and chronic postoperative pain after fixation of mesh with tacks and the cost of tacking devices are major hindrances to the widespread use of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair in resource-poor settings. This study sought to introduce a method of mesh fixation that will reduce the cost of laparoscopic TAPP repair and might help reduce postoperative pain.

OBJECTIVE

To compare outcomes in the early postoperative period like pain, seroma, hematoma, urinary retention, and neuralgia after fixation with suture versus the tack fixation of mesh in laparoscopic TAPP repair of inguinal hernia.  Subjects and methods: This study was conducted from 1June 2019 to 31 May 2020. A total of 144 patients between ages 18 and 60 years with an inguinal hernia on any side and having an American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) score of I/II were included in this study. Patients with a recurrent hernia, large scrotal hernia, strangulated and obstructed hernias, ASA III and ASA IV, prostatism, and chronic cough were excluded. Seventy-two patients were in Group A (tack fixation group) while 72 were in Group B (suture fixation group). Separate investigators were assigned to collect pre-operative and post-operative data from both groups, recorded on specially designed proforma.

RESULTS

The age range was 18 to 60 years with a mean age of 46.53 years ±10.01 S.D in Group A and 46.19 ±9.58 S.D in Group B. In Group A 98.6% of patients were male, and 1.4% were females while in Group B 100% of patients were male. It was found that mean pain in Group A was 4.88 ±0.887 and 5.29± 0.777 at 6 hours and 24 hours respectively. Mean pain in group B was 3.43 ±0.962 and 4.11±0.703 at 6 hours and 24 hours respectively. Moreover, mean pain in Group B was significantly less than mean pain in Group A both at 6 hours and 24 hours intervals with a p-value < 0.001. The early postoperative complications were not significantly different in both groups.  Conclusion: In TAPP repair, suture fixation of mesh is less painful than tack fixation. However, there is no significant difference in the rate of other early postoperative outcomes like seroma, hematoma, urinary retention, and neuralgia. Further multicentric studies with a longer duration of follow-up are needed to validate our results.

摘要

引言

腹腔镜技术在腹股沟疝修补术中的应用显著改善了腹股沟疝手术的效果。然而,用钉合器固定补片后的急慢性术后疼痛以及钉合器的成本是资源匮乏地区腹腔镜经腹腹膜前(TAPP)修补术广泛应用的主要障碍。本研究旨在引入一种补片固定方法,以降低腹腔镜TAPP修补术的成本,并可能有助于减轻术后疼痛。

目的

比较腹股沟疝腹腔镜TAPP修补术中用缝线固定补片与用钉合器固定补片后早期术后疼痛、血清肿、血肿、尿潴留和神经痛等方面的结果。

受试者和方法

本研究于2019年6月1日至2020年5月31日进行。本研究纳入了144例年龄在18至60岁之间、任何一侧患有腹股沟疝且美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分为I/II级的患者。复发性疝、巨大阴囊疝、绞窄性和梗阻性疝、ASA III级和ASA IV级、前列腺增生和慢性咳嗽患者被排除。A组(钉合器固定组)72例患者,B组(缝线固定组)72例患者。分别安排研究人员收集两组患者术前和术后的数据,记录在专门设计的表格上。

结果

年龄范围为18至60岁,A组平均年龄为46.53岁±10.01标准差,B组为46.19±9.58标准差。A组98.6%为男性,1.4%为女性,而B组100%为男性。结果发现,A组在6小时和24小时时的平均疼痛评分分别为4.88±0.887和5.29±0.777。B组在6小时和24小时时的平均疼痛评分分别为3.43±0.962和4.11±0.703。此外,B组在6小时和24小时时的平均疼痛评分均显著低于A组,p值<0.001。两组术后早期并发症无显著差异。

结论

在TAPP修补术中,缝线固定补片比钉合器固定更不易引起疼痛。然而,在血清肿、血肿、尿潴留和神经痛等其他术后早期结果的发生率上没有显著差异。需要进一步进行多中心、随访时间更长的研究来验证我们的结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3489/9372384/fda5953c45f1/cureus-0014-00000026821-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3489/9372384/fda5953c45f1/cureus-0014-00000026821-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3489/9372384/fda5953c45f1/cureus-0014-00000026821-i01.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of Early Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Suture Fixation Versus Tack Fixation of Mesh in Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) Repair of Inguinal Hernia.腹腔镜经腹腹膜前(TAPP)腹股沟疝修补术中采用缝线固定与钉合固定补片患者的早期结局比较。
Cureus. 2022 Jul 13;14(7):e26821. doi: 10.7759/cureus.26821. eCollection 2022 Jul.
2
Cost comparison of fibrin sealant versus tack screws for mesh fixation in laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中使用纤维蛋白胶与钉合螺钉固定补片的成本比较。
Hosp Pract (1995). 2018 Oct;46(4):233-237. doi: 10.1080/21548331.2018.1500369. Epub 2018 Jul 25.
3
Assessment of feasibility and safety of cyanoacrylate glue versus absorbable tacks for inguinal hernia mesh fixation. A prospective comparative study.氰基丙烯酸酯胶水与可吸收钉用于腹股沟疝修补网片固定的可行性及安全性评估:一项前瞻性对照研究。
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2023 Mar;18(1):90-98. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2022.119780. Epub 2022 Sep 24.
4
A Prospective Comparative Study of Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal (TEP) and Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) Inguinal Hernial Repair.腹腔镜完全腹膜外(TEP)与腹腔镜经腹腹膜前(TAPP)腹股沟疝修补术的前瞻性对比研究
Cureus. 2023 Jul 20;15(7):e42209. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42209. eCollection 2023 Jul.
5
Outcomes Of Mesh Fixation Versus Non Fixation In Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Randomized Clinical Study.腹腔镜经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术中网片固定与非固定的结局:一项随机临床研究。
J Pak Med Assoc. 2023 Apr;73(Suppl 4)(4):S8-S12. doi: 10.47391/JPMA.EGY-S4-2.
6
A prospective, randomized comparison of long-term outcomes: chronic groin pain and quality of life following totally extraperitoneal (TEP) and transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.一项前瞻性、随机对照比较研究:完全腹膜外(TEP)和经腹腹膜前(TAPP)腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后慢性腹股沟疼痛和生活质量的长期结局。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Jul;27(7):2373-82. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-2797-7. Epub 2013 Feb 7.
7
Comparison of mesh fixation and non-fixation in transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair: a randomized control trial.经腹腹膜前修补术(TAPP)腹股沟疝修补术中网片固定与非固定的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Aug;37(8):5847-5854. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10040-x. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
8
Mesh fixation methods and chronic pain after transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia surgery: a comparison between fibrin sealant and tacks.网片固定方法与经腹腹膜前修补术(TAPP)腹股沟疝术后慢性疼痛:纤维蛋白胶与钉枪的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Oct;31(10):4077-4084. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5454-8. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
9
Prospective comparison of two surgical approaches for incarcerated and strangulated inguinal hernia: preperitoneal hernioplasty through the lower abdominal median incision and laparoscope (TAPP).经下腹正中切口腹膜前疝修补术与腹腔镜(TAPP)治疗嵌顿绞窄性腹股沟疝的前瞻性对比研究。
Updates Surg. 2024 Nov;76(7):2603-2610. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-01944-x. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
10
Early Outcomes of Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) Repair.腹腔镜经腹腹膜前(TAPP)修补术的早期疗效
Cureus. 2023 Feb 28;15(2):e35567. doi: 10.7759/cureus.35567. eCollection 2023 Feb.

引用本文的文献

1
Mesh fixation in laparoscopic groin hernia repair: a comprehensive review of techniques and devices.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中的补片固定:技术与器械的全面综述
Hernia. 2025 Feb 19;29(1):105. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03276-0.
2
Suture versus tacks in minimally invasive transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.缝合与钉合在微创经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术中的比较:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Sep;38(9):4858-4868. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11138-6. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
3
Comparison of single absorbable tacker vs. conventional method in fixating the mesh in bilateral inguinal hernia undergoing laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP): A randomized control trial study.

本文引用的文献

1
Mesh erosion into urinary bladder following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后补片侵蚀入膀胱
J Minim Access Surg. 2017 Apr-Jun;13(2):139-142. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.195579.
2
A comparison of post operative pain and hospital stay between Lichtenstein's repair and Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) repair of inguinal hernia: A randomized controlled trial.腹股沟疝利氏修补术与腹腔镜经腹腹膜前修补术(TAPP)术后疼痛及住院时间的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Pak J Med Sci. 2015 Sep-Oct;31(5):1062-6. doi: 10.12669/pjms.315.4811.
3
Comparison of peritoneal closure techniques in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a prospective randomized study.
单根可吸收钉合器与传统方法在腹腔镜经腹腹膜前修补术(TAPP)治疗双侧腹股沟疝中固定补片的比较:一项随机对照试验研究。
J Res Med Sci. 2024 Apr 29;29:25. doi: 10.4103/jrms.jrms_161_23. eCollection 2024.
腹腔镜经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术中腹膜关闭技术的比较:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Hernia. 2015 Dec;19(6):879-85. doi: 10.1007/s10029-015-1431-0. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
4
Pros and cons of tacking in laparoscopic hernia repair.腹腔镜疝修补术中钉合的利弊。
Surg Technol Int. 2014 Nov;25:136-40.
5
Suture versus tack fixation of mesh in laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair.腹腔镜脐疝修补术中补片的缝合固定与钉合固定
JSLS. 2013 Oct-Dec;17(4):560-4. doi: 10.4293/108680813X13693422520044.
6
Mesh fixation in TAPP laparoscopic hernia repair: introduction of a new method in a prospective randomized trial.经腹腹膜前修补术(TAPP)腹腔镜疝修补术中的补片固定:一项前瞻性随机试验中的新方法介绍
Surg Endosc. 2014 Feb;28(2):531-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3198-7. Epub 2013 Oct 3.
7
Efficiency and safety of mesh fixation in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair using n-butyl cyanoacrylate: long-term biocompatibility in over 1,300 mesh fixations.采用正丁基氰基丙烯酸酯固定网片在腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中的效率和安全性:超过 1300 次网片固定的长期生物相容性。
Hernia. 2012 Apr;16(2):153-62. doi: 10.1007/s10029-011-0887-9. Epub 2011 Oct 21.
8
Transabdominal pre-peritoneal inguinal hernia repair with external fixation.经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术联合外固定。
Hernia. 2011 Apr;15(2):185-8. doi: 10.1007/s10029-010-0766-9. Epub 2011 Feb 11.
9
Mesh-fixation method and pain and quality of life after laparoscopic ventral or incisional hernia repair: a randomized trial of three fixation techniques.网片固定方法与腹腔镜腹侧或切口疝修补术后疼痛和生活质量:三种固定技术的随机试验。
Surg Endosc. 2010 Jun;24(6):1296-302. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0763-1. Epub 2009 Dec 24.
10
Laparoscopic hernia repair--the best option?腹腔镜疝修补术——最佳选择?
Acta Chir Belg. 2008 Mar-Apr;108(2):186-91. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2008.11680200.