Suppr超能文献

经下腹正中切口腹膜前疝修补术与腹腔镜(TAPP)治疗嵌顿绞窄性腹股沟疝的前瞻性对比研究。

Prospective comparison of two surgical approaches for incarcerated and strangulated inguinal hernia: preperitoneal hernioplasty through the lower abdominal median incision and laparoscope (TAPP).

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Jinshan Hospital of Fudan University, No. 1508 Longhang Road, Jinshan District, Shanghai, 201508, China.

出版信息

Updates Surg. 2024 Nov;76(7):2603-2610. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-01944-x. Epub 2024 Jul 17.

Abstract

The optimal surgical approach of incarcerated and strangulated inguinal hernia is controversial. Retrospective studies showed that surgical approaches through lower abdominal median incision or laparoscopic are superior to the oblique inguinal incision, respectively. Whether transabdominal laparoscopic approach is superior to the lower abdominal median incision approach needs prospective research.Prospective comparative study of patients with incarcerated and strangulated groin hernia admitted to Jinshan hospital for emergency surgery from January 2018 to June 2022. They were divided into two groups according to different surgical approach. The open preperitoneal repair group (OPR) was operated through the lower abdominal median incision. Laparoscopic preperitoneal repair group (TAPP) was completed under transabdominal laparoscope. The perioperative complications and long-term results of the two groups were compared and analyzed. Eighty-two patients met the inclusion criteria, 40 in OPR group and 42 in TAPP group. Baseline data of the two groups were comparable. Thirteen cases (15.9%) of the two groups underwent intestinal resection and anastomosis. Seventy cases (90.2%) underwent the 1st stage mesh repair, including 5 cases of preperitoneal hernioplasty after intestinal resection. The average operation time of TAPP group was 13 min longer (60.7 ± 13.7 min vs 47.8 ± 19.8 min P < 0.001), and the visual analogue scale pain score at 24 h after operation was lower (3.5 ± 1.2 vs 4.4 ± 1.7 P = 0.019) than that of OPR group. There was 1 case of bladder injury (2.5%) in OPR group and 1 case of inferior abdominal artery injury (2.4%) in TAPP group. There was no difference in the rate of the 1st stage hernioplasty between the two groups. In OPR group, 2 cases (5%) extended the incision for more than 2 cm, while in TAPP group, 1 case (2.4%) converted to laparotomy. The time of hospital stay (3.2 ± 1.8 d vs 4.3 ± 2.7 d, P = 0.036) and return to normal activities (7.9 ± 2.7 d vs 11.0 ± 4.4 d, P < 0.001) were shorter in TAPP group. The rate of total postoperative complications including chronic pain, surgical-site infection, seroma, hernia recurrence and so on was 11.9% in TAPP group, which was not significantly different from 25% in OPR group (P = 0.212). There were no cases of mesh related infection and death within 30 days in both groups.TAPP is safe and feasible for the operation of acute incarcerated inguinal hernia. TAPP had better comfort and faster recovery over open preperitoneal repair for the appropriate patients with incarcerated/strangulated inguinal hernia, which can reduce acute pain, shorten hospital stay and return to normal activities earlier.

摘要

嵌顿性腹股沟疝的最佳手术入路存在争议。回顾性研究表明,通过下腹部正中切口或腹腔镜进行的手术入路分别优于斜切口。经腹腹腔镜入路是否优于下腹部正中切口入路需要前瞻性研究。

对 2018 年 1 月至 2022 年 6 月因急诊手术收治于金山医院的嵌顿性腹股沟疝患者进行前瞻性对比研究。根据不同的手术入路将患者分为两组。开放腹膜前修补组(OPR)通过下腹部正中切口进行手术。腹腔镜腹膜前修补组(TAPP)在经腹腹腔镜下完成。比较分析两组患者的围手术期并发症和远期结果。

82 例符合纳入标准,OPR 组 40 例,TAPP 组 42 例。两组基线资料可比。两组各有 13 例(15.9%)行肠切除吻合术。70 例(90.2%)行一期网片修补,其中 5 例肠切除后行腹膜前修补。TAPP 组的平均手术时间延长 13 分钟(60.7±13.7 分钟比 47.8±19.8 分钟,P<0.001),术后 24 小时视觉模拟评分疼痛较低(3.5±1.2 分比 4.4±1.7 分,P=0.019)。OPR 组有 1 例(2.5%)膀胱损伤,TAPP 组有 1 例(2.4%)下腹动脉损伤。两组一期疝修补率无差异。OPR 组 2 例(5%)切口延长超过 2cm,TAPP 组 1 例(2.4%)转为开腹。TAPP 组的住院时间(3.2±1.8 天比 4.3±2.7 天,P=0.036)和恢复正常活动时间(7.9±2.7 天比 11.0±4.4 天,P<0.001)较短。TAPP 组总术后并发症发生率(包括慢性疼痛、手术部位感染、血清肿、疝复发等)为 11.9%,与 OPR 组的 25%无显著差异(P=0.212)。两组均无 30 天内与网片相关的感染和死亡病例。

TAPP 治疗急性嵌顿性腹股沟疝安全可行。对于合适的嵌顿/绞窄性腹股沟疝患者,TAPP 较开放腹膜前修补具有更好的舒适度和更快的恢复,可减轻急性疼痛,缩短住院时间和更早恢复正常活动。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验