• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在没有早孕期结构筛查的情况下,引入通用游离胎儿 DNA 后胎儿结构异常的诊断时机。

Timing of diagnosis of fetal structural abnormalities after the introduction of universal cell-free DNA in the absence of first-trimester anatomical screening.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Prenat Diagn. 2022 Sep;42(10):1242-1252. doi: 10.1002/pd.6224. Epub 2022 Sep 3.

DOI:10.1002/pd.6224
PMID:35971853
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9545196/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Since 2021, first-trimester anatomical screening (FTAS) is offered in the Netherlands alongside genome-wide cell-free DNA (cfDNA). Previously, only second-trimester anatomical screening (STAS) was offered. This study identifies structural abnormalities amenable to first-trimester diagnosis detected at/after STAS in the period following cfDNA implementation and preceding FTAS introduction.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort includes 547 fetuses referred between 2017 and 2020 because of suspected structural abnormalities before/at/after STAS. Additional prenatal investigations and postnatal follow-up were searched. Abnormalities were classified into "always", "sometimes", and "never" detectable in the first-trimester based on a previously suggested classification.

RESULTS

Of the 547 pregnancies, 13 (2.6%) received FTAS and 534 (97.6%) received a dating ultrasound and STAS. In 492/534 (92.1%) anomalies were confirmed; 66 (13.4%) belonged to the "always detectable" group in the first trimester, 303 (61.6%) to the "sometimes detectable", and 123 (25.0%) to the never detectable. Of the "always detectable" anomalies 29/66 (44%) were diagnosed during dating ultrasounds and 37 (56%) during STAS. The rate of termination of pregnancy for anomalies detected during FTAS and at/after STAS was 84.6% (n = 11/13) and 29.3% (n = 144/492) (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

When FTAS is not part of screening paradigms, most fetal anomalies remain undetected until the second trimester or later in pregnancy, including 56% of anomalies "always detectable" in the first trimester.

摘要

介绍

自 2021 年以来,荷兰在提供全基因组游离胎儿 DNA(cfDNA)的同时,也提供了早孕期解剖学筛查(FTAS)。在此之前,仅提供中孕期解剖学筛查(STAS)。本研究旨在识别 cfDNA 实施后和 FTAS 引入前的 STAS 之后/期间,可在早孕期诊断的结构性异常。

方法

本回顾性队列纳入了 2017 年至 2020 年间因疑似结构异常而转诊的 547 例胎儿。对额外的产前检查和产后随访进行了搜索。异常根据之前提出的分类,分为“总是”、“有时”和“从未”在早孕期可检测到。

结果

547 例妊娠中,13 例(2.6%)接受了 FTAS,534 例(97.6%)接受了超声检查和 STAS。在 492/534 例(92.1%)中确认存在异常;66 例(13.4%)属于早孕期“总是可检测到”的异常,303 例(61.6%)属于“有时可检测到”的异常,123 例(25.0%)属于“从未可检测到”的异常。在“总是可检测到”的异常中,29/66 例(44%)在超声检查时诊断,37 例(56%)在 STAS 时诊断。在 FTAS 和 STAS 之后/期间检测到的异常中,终止妊娠的比例分别为 84.6%(n=11/13)和 29.3%(n=144/492)(p<0.01)。

结论

当 FTAS 不包含在筛查方案中时,大多数胎儿异常在妊娠中期或更晚仍未被检测到,包括 56%的在早孕期“总是可检测到”的异常。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6227/9545196/d535f5f72ad3/PD-42-1242-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6227/9545196/d535f5f72ad3/PD-42-1242-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6227/9545196/d535f5f72ad3/PD-42-1242-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Timing of diagnosis of fetal structural abnormalities after the introduction of universal cell-free DNA in the absence of first-trimester anatomical screening.在没有早孕期结构筛查的情况下,引入通用游离胎儿 DNA 后胎儿结构异常的诊断时机。
Prenat Diagn. 2022 Sep;42(10):1242-1252. doi: 10.1002/pd.6224. Epub 2022 Sep 3.
2
Prenatal diagnosis and pregnancy outcome of major structural anomalies detectable in the first trimester: A population-based cohort study in the Netherlands.荷兰基于人群的队列研究:早孕期可检测到的主要结构异常的产前诊断和妊娠结局。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2022 Nov;36(6):804-814. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12914. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
3
Impact of first-trimester anomaly scan on health-related quality of life and healthcare costs: a scoping review.早孕期异常扫描对健康相关生活质量和医疗保健费用的影响:范围综述。
J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2024 Dec;45(1):2330414. doi: 10.1080/0167482X.2024.2330414. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
4
Should cell-free DNA testing be used in pregnancy with increased fetal nuchal translucency?在胎儿颈项透明层增厚的妊娠中是否应该使用游离 DNA 检测?
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 May;55(5):645-651. doi: 10.1002/uog.20397. Epub 2020 Apr 7.
5
[Prospective cohort study of fetal nuchal translucency in first-trimester and pregnancy outcome].孕早期胎儿颈部透明带与妊娠结局的前瞻性队列研究
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Feb 25;55(2):94-99. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567X.2020.02.007.
6
Eliminating first trimester combined testing: Consequences for early detection of significant fetal anomalies.取消早孕期联合筛查:对检出严重胎儿畸形的影响。
Prenat Diagn. 2024 May;44(5):544-554. doi: 10.1002/pd.6552. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
7
Diagnosis of fetal non-chromosomal abnormalities on routine ultrasound examination at 11-13 weeks' gestation.在 11-13 孕周的常规超声检查中诊断胎儿非染色体异常。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Oct;54(4):468-476. doi: 10.1002/uog.20844.
8
Introduction of a nationwide first-trimester anomaly scan in the Dutch national screening program.荷兰国家筛查计划中引入全国性孕早期异常扫描。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Apr;232(4):396.e1-396.e19. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.07.026. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
9
Early Detection of Structural Anomalies in a Primary Care Setting in the Netherlands.荷兰初级保健环境中结构性异常的早期检测。
Fetal Diagn Ther. 2019;46(1):12-19. doi: 10.1159/000490723. Epub 2018 Jul 25.
10
Systematic review of first-trimester ultrasound screening for detection of fetal structural anomalies and factors that affect screening performance.系统评价早孕期超声筛查检测胎儿结构畸形及影响筛查效能的因素。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Oct;50(4):429-441. doi: 10.1002/uog.17246. Epub 2017 Sep 7.

本文引用的文献

1
First-trimester ultrasound detection of fetal heart anomalies: systematic review and meta-analysis.早孕期胎儿心脏畸形的超声检测:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jan;59(1):11-25. doi: 10.1002/uog.23740.
2
ISUOG statement on the safe use of Doppler for fetal ultrasound examination in the first 13 + 6 weeks of pregnancy (updated).国际妇产科超声学会关于妊娠13⁺⁶周前胎儿超声检查中多普勒安全使用的声明(更新版)
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jun;57(6):1020. doi: 10.1002/uog.23610.
3
Psychological outcomes, knowledge and preferences of pregnant women on first-trimester screening for fetal structural abnormalities: A prospective cohort study.
孕妇在孕早期胎儿结构异常筛查方面的心理结果、知识和偏好:一项前瞻性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 27;16(1):e0245938. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245938. eCollection 2021.
4
Uptake of fetal aneuploidy screening after the introduction of the non-invasive prenatal test: A national population-based register study.非侵入性产前检测引入后胎儿非整倍体筛查的应用:一项全国基于人群的登记研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021 Jul;100(7):1265-1272. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14091. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
5
Routine first-trimester ultrasound screening using a standardized anatomical protocol.使用标准化解剖学方案进行常规孕早期超声筛查。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Apr;224(4):396.e1-396.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.10.037. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
6
TRIDENT-2: National Implementation of Genome-wide Non-invasive Prenatal Testing as a First-Tier Screening Test in the Netherlands.TRIDENT-2:荷兰全国范围内实施全基因组非侵入性产前筛查作为一级筛查检测。
Am J Hum Genet. 2019 Dec 5;105(6):1091-1101. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.10.005. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
7
Is there still a role for nuchal translucency measurement in the changing paradigm of first trimester screening?颈项透明层测量在不断变化的早孕期筛查模式中是否仍有作用?
Prenat Diagn. 2020 Jan;40(2):197-205. doi: 10.1002/pd.5590. Epub 2019 Nov 27.
8
Diagnosis of fetal non-chromosomal abnormalities on routine ultrasound examination at 11-13 weeks' gestation.在 11-13 孕周的常规超声检查中诊断胎儿非染色体异常。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Oct;54(4):468-476. doi: 10.1002/uog.20844.
9
Early Detection of Structural Anomalies in a Primary Care Setting in the Netherlands.荷兰初级保健环境中结构性异常的早期检测。
Fetal Diagn Ther. 2019;46(1):12-19. doi: 10.1159/000490723. Epub 2018 Jul 25.
10
Effectiveness of 12-13-week scan for early diagnosis of fetal congenital anomalies in the cell-free DNA era.在游离胎儿 DNA 时代,12-13 周扫描在胎儿先天性畸形早期诊断中的有效性。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Apr;51(4):463-469. doi: 10.1002/uog.17487. Epub 2018 Mar 4.