• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

孕妇在孕早期胎儿结构异常筛查方面的心理结果、知识和偏好:一项前瞻性队列研究。

Psychological outcomes, knowledge and preferences of pregnant women on first-trimester screening for fetal structural abnormalities: A prospective cohort study.

作者信息

Bardi Francesca, Bakker Merel, Kenkhuis Monique J A, Ranchor Adelita V, Bakker Marian K, Elvan-Taşpınar Ayten, Birnie Erwin, Bilardo Caterina M

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Department of Health Psychology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Jan 27;16(1):e0245938. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245938. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0245938
PMID:33503072
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7840026/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The primary aim of this study is to investigate the impact of a 13-week anomaly scan on the experienced levels of maternal anxiety and well-being. Secondly, to explore women's knowledge on the possibilities and limitations of the scan and the preferred timing of screening for structural abnormalities.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In a prospective-cohort study conducted between 2013-2015, pregnant women in the North-Netherlands underwent a 13-week anomaly scan. Four online-questionnaires (Q1, Q2, Q3 and Q4) were completed before and after the 13- and the 20-week anomaly scans. In total, 1512 women consented to participate in the study and 1118 (74%) completed the questionnaires at Q1, 941 (64%) at Q2, 807 (55%) at Q3 and 535 (37%) at Q4. Psychological outcomes were measured by the state-trait inventory-scale (STAI), the patient's positive-negative affect (PANAS) and ad-hoc designed questionnaires.

RESULTS

Nine-nine percent of women wished to be informed as early as possible in pregnancy about the absence/presence of structural abnormalities. In 87% of women levels of knowledge on the goals and limitations of the 13-week anomaly scan were moderate-to-high. In women with a normal 13-week scan result, anxiety levels decreased (P < .001) and well-being increased over time (P < .001). In women with false-positive results (n = 26), anxiety levels initially increased (STAI-Q1: 39.8 vs. STAI-Q2: 48.6, P = 0.025), but later decreased around the 20-week anomaly scan (STAI-Q3: 36.4 vs. STAI-Q4: 34.2, P = 0.36).

CONCLUSIONS

The 13-week scan did not negatively impact the psychological well-being of pregnant women. The small number of women with screen-positive results temporarily experienced higher anxiety after the scan but, in false-positive cases, anxiety levels normalized again when the abnormality was not confirmed at follow-up scans. Finally, most pregnant women have moderate-to-high levels of knowledge and strongly prefer early screening for fetal structural abnormalities.

摘要

引言

本研究的主要目的是调查13周异常扫描对孕妇焦虑和幸福感体验水平的影响。其次,探讨女性对扫描的可能性和局限性以及结构异常筛查的最佳时机的了解情况。

材料与方法

在2013年至2015年进行的一项前瞻性队列研究中,荷兰北部的孕妇接受了13周异常扫描。在13周和20周异常扫描前后完成了四份在线问卷(Q1、Q2、Q3和Q4)。共有1512名女性同意参与该研究,1118名(74%)在Q1完成问卷,941名(64%)在Q2完成问卷,807名(55%)在Q3完成问卷,535名(37%)在Q4完成问卷。心理结果通过状态-特质焦虑量表(STAI)、患者正负性情绪量表(PANAS)和专门设计的问卷进行测量。

结果

99%的女性希望在孕期尽早得知结构异常的有无情况。87%的女性对13周异常扫描的目的和局限性的了解程度为中到高。13周扫描结果正常的女性,焦虑水平下降(P <.001),幸福感随时间增加(P <.001)。在假阳性结果的女性中(n = 26),焦虑水平最初升高(STAI-Q1:39.8 vs. STAI-Q2:48.6,P = 0.025),但在20周异常扫描前后有所下降(STAI-Q3:36.4 vs. STAI-Q4:34.2,P = 0.36)。

结论

13周扫描对孕妇的心理健康没有负面影响。少数筛查结果为阳性的女性在扫描后暂时经历了更高的焦虑,但在假阳性病例中,当后续扫描未确认异常时,焦虑水平再次恢复正常。最后,大多数孕妇有中到高的了解程度,并且强烈倾向于早期筛查胎儿结构异常。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e52/7840026/ae766322854f/pone.0245938.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e52/7840026/5df901a73ce5/pone.0245938.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e52/7840026/72fb08ebb4d3/pone.0245938.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e52/7840026/f9105608582f/pone.0245938.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e52/7840026/ae766322854f/pone.0245938.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e52/7840026/5df901a73ce5/pone.0245938.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e52/7840026/72fb08ebb4d3/pone.0245938.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e52/7840026/f9105608582f/pone.0245938.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e52/7840026/ae766322854f/pone.0245938.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Psychological outcomes, knowledge and preferences of pregnant women on first-trimester screening for fetal structural abnormalities: A prospective cohort study.孕妇在孕早期胎儿结构异常筛查方面的心理结果、知识和偏好:一项前瞻性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 27;16(1):e0245938. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245938. eCollection 2021.
2
Maternal psychological responses during pregnancy after ultrasonographic detection of structural fetal anomalies: A prospective longitudinal observational study.超声检查发现胎儿结构异常后孕妇孕期的心理反应:一项前瞻性纵向观察研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 28;12(3):e0174412. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174412. eCollection 2017.
3
The importance of information and support following a suspected second-trimester anomaly that is later discarded: A qualitative study of women's experiences.疑似中期异常后获得信息和支持的重要性:一项对女性经历的定性研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022 Jan;101(1):94-101. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14288. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
4
Does fetal screening affect women's worries about the health of their baby? A randomized controlled trial of ultrasound screening for Down's syndrome versus routine ultrasound screening.胎儿筛查会影响女性对其宝宝健康的担忧吗?一项关于唐氏综合征超声筛查与常规超声筛查的随机对照试验。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004 Jul;83(7):634-40. doi: 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2004.00462.x.
5
Evaluation of the relationship between worry and anxiety with the general health status of pregnant women at risk of diagnosing abnormalities.评估处于异常诊断风险中的孕妇的担忧和焦虑与总体健康状况之间的关系。
Reprod Health. 2025 Jan 15;22(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12978-024-01925-8.
6
[Prospective cohort study of fetal nuchal translucency in first-trimester and pregnancy outcome].孕早期胎儿颈部透明带与妊娠结局的前瞻性队列研究
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Feb 25;55(2):94-99. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567X.2020.02.007.
7
Introduction of a nationwide first-trimester anomaly scan in the Dutch national screening program.荷兰国家筛查计划中引入全国性孕早期异常扫描。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Apr;232(4):396.e1-396.e19. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.07.026. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
8
Association of Prenatal Maternal Psychological Distress With Fetal Brain Growth, Metabolism, and Cortical Maturation.产前母体心理困扰与胎儿大脑生长、代谢和皮质成熟的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1919940. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.19940.
9
Effectiveness of 12-13-week scan for early diagnosis of fetal congenital anomalies in the cell-free DNA era.在游离胎儿 DNA 时代,12-13 周扫描在胎儿先天性畸形早期诊断中的有效性。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Apr;51(4):463-469. doi: 10.1002/uog.17487. Epub 2018 Mar 4.
10
Psycho-Emotional Impact of Anomaly Ultrasound Scan in Romanian Pregnant Women.罗马尼亚孕妇超声异常扫描的心理情绪影响
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Oct 21;9(11):1415. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9111415.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical and cost-effectiveness of detailed anomaly ultrasound screening in the first trimester: a mixed-methods study.孕早期详细异常超声筛查的临床效果及成本效益:一项混合方法研究
Health Technol Assess. 2025 May;29(22):1-250. doi: 10.3310/NLTP7102.
2
Predictive Capacity of First-Trimester Diagnosis of Placenta Previa.孕早期前置胎盘诊断的预测能力
Am J Perinatol. 2025 Apr 22. doi: 10.1055/a-2572-1646.
3
Evaluating the Cost-Effectiveness of Antenatal Screening for Major Structural Anomalies During the First Trimester of Pregnancy: A Decision Model.

本文引用的文献

1
Attitude, knowledge and informed choice towards prenatal screening for Down Syndrome: a cross-sectional study.对唐氏综合征产前筛查的态度、知识和知情选择:一项横断面研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Nov 12;18(1):439. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-2077-6.
2
The Use of a Game-Based Decision Aid to Educate Pregnant Women about Prenatal Screening: A Randomized Controlled Study.基于游戏的决策辅助工具在孕妇产前筛查教育中的应用:一项随机对照研究。
Am J Perinatol. 2019 Feb;36(3):322-328. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1667371. Epub 2018 Aug 14.
3
Early Detection of Structural Anomalies in a Primary Care Setting in the Netherlands.
评估孕早期主要结构异常产前筛查的成本效益:一种决策模型
BJOG. 2025 Apr;132(5):638-647. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.18053. Epub 2025 Jan 21.
4
Exploring measurement tools used to assess knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of pregnant women toward prenatal screening: A systematic review.探讨用于评估孕妇对产前筛查的知识、态度和看法的测量工具:系统评价。
Womens Health (Lond). 2024 Jan-Dec;20:17455057241273557. doi: 10.1177/17455057241273557.
5
Factors influencing participation and regular attendance in a program combining physical activity and nutritional advice for overweight and obese pregnant women.影响超重和肥胖孕妇参加并定期参加身体活动和营养咨询相结合计划的因素。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Jun 28;24(1):449. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06648-z.
6
Maternal Reassurance, Satisfaction, and Anxiety after First-Trimester Screening for Aneuploidies: Comparison between Contingent Screening and Universal Cell-Free DNA Testing.孕早期非整倍体筛查后的母亲安心程度、满意度及焦虑状况:偶然筛查与通用无细胞DNA检测的比较
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Jun 6;14(11):1198. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14111198.
7
First-trimester preeclampsia screening and prevention: impact on patient satisfaction and anxiety.孕早期子痫前期的筛查与预防:对患者满意度和焦虑的影响。
AJOG Glob Rep. 2023 Apr 5;3(2):100205. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2023.100205. eCollection 2023 May.
8
Quantifying the psychological and behavioural consequences of a diagnostic label for non-cancer conditions: systematic review.量化非癌症疾病诊断标签的心理和行为后果:系统评价
BJPsych Open. 2023 Apr 19;9(3):e73. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2023.49.
9
Timing of diagnosis of fetal structural abnormalities after the introduction of universal cell-free DNA in the absence of first-trimester anatomical screening.在没有早孕期结构筛查的情况下,引入通用游离胎儿 DNA 后胎儿结构异常的诊断时机。
Prenat Diagn. 2022 Sep;42(10):1242-1252. doi: 10.1002/pd.6224. Epub 2022 Sep 3.
10
Parental Hopes and Understandings of the Value of Prenatal Diagnostic Genomic Sequencing: A Qualitative Analysis.父母对产前诊断基因组测序价值的期望与理解:一项定性分析
Front Genet. 2022 Jul 18;13:883225. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.883225. eCollection 2022.
荷兰初级保健环境中结构性异常的早期检测。
Fetal Diagn Ther. 2019;46(1):12-19. doi: 10.1159/000490723. Epub 2018 Jul 25.
4
Decision support tools in low back pain.下背痛的决策支持工具。
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2016 Dec;30(6):1084-1097. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2017.07.002. Epub 2017 Aug 5.
5
Effectiveness of 12-13-week scan for early diagnosis of fetal congenital anomalies in the cell-free DNA era.在游离胎儿 DNA 时代,12-13 周扫描在胎儿先天性畸形早期诊断中的有效性。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Apr;51(4):463-469. doi: 10.1002/uog.17487. Epub 2018 Mar 4.
6
Maternal psychological responses during pregnancy after ultrasonographic detection of structural fetal anomalies: A prospective longitudinal observational study.超声检查发现胎儿结构异常后孕妇孕期的心理反应:一项前瞻性纵向观察研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 28;12(3):e0174412. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174412. eCollection 2017.
7
Prevalence of antenatal and postnatal anxiety: systematic review and meta-analysis.产前和产后焦虑的患病率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Br J Psychiatry. 2017 May;210(5):315-323. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.116.187179. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
8
Systematic review of first-trimester ultrasound screening for detection of fetal structural anomalies and factors that affect screening performance.系统评价早孕期超声筛查检测胎儿结构畸形及影响筛查效能的因素。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Oct;50(4):429-441. doi: 10.1002/uog.17246. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
9
Maternal attitude towards first trimester screening for fetal abnormalities.孕妇对孕早期胎儿异常筛查的态度。
Prenat Diagn. 2016 May;36(5):449-55. doi: 10.1002/pd.4802. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
10
Does screening for Down's syndrome cause anxiety in pregnant women? A systematic review.唐氏综合征筛查会导致孕妇焦虑吗?一项系统综述。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015 Jan;94(1):15-27. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12482. Epub 2014 Sep 21.