• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精准医学中的种族公平性:儿科哮喘预测算法。

Racial Fairness in Precision Medicine: Pediatric Asthma Prediction Algorithms.

机构信息

School of Medicine, 2629University of South Carolina, Cincinnati, OH, USA.

Department of Pediatrics, 2518Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.

出版信息

Am J Health Promot. 2023 Feb;37(2):239-242. doi: 10.1177/08901171221121639. Epub 2022 Aug 16.

DOI:10.1177/08901171221121639
PMID:35973209
Abstract

PURPOSE

Quantify and examine the racial fairness of two widely used childhood asthma predictive precision medicine algorithms: the asthma predictive index (API) and the pediatric asthma risk score (PARS).

DESIGN

Apply the API and PARS and evaluate model performance overall and when stratified by race.

SETTING

Cincinnati, OH, USA.

SUBJECTS

A prospective birth cohort of 590 children with clinically measured asthma diagnosis by age seven.

MEASURES

Model diagnostic criteria included sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV).

ANALYSIS

Significant differences in model performance between Black and white children were considered to be present if the -value associated with a t-test based on 100 bootstrap replications was less than .05.

RESULTS

Compared to predictions for white children, predictions for Black children using the PARS had a higher sensitivity (.88 vs .57), lower specificity (.55 vs .83), higher PPV (.42 vs .33), but a similar NPV (.93 vs .93). Within the API and compared to predictions for white children, predictions for Black children had a higher sensitivity (.63 vs .53), similar specificity (.81 vs .80), higher PPV (.54 vs .28), and lower NPV (.86 vs .92).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, racial disparities in model diagnostic criteria were greatest for sensitivity and specificity in the PARS, but racial disparities existed in three of the four criteria for both the PARS and the API.

摘要

目的

量化和检验两种广泛应用于儿童哮喘预测精准医学算法的种族公平性:哮喘预测指数(API)和儿科哮喘风险评分(PARS)。

设计

应用 API 和 PARS,并评估整体模型性能以及按种族分层的模型性能。

地点

美国俄亥俄州辛辛那提。

受试者

一个前瞻性的 590 名儿童出生队列,在七岁时通过临床测量哮喘诊断。

测量

模型诊断标准包括敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)。

分析

如果基于 100 次 bootstrap 复制的 t 检验的 -值小于.05,则认为黑人儿童和白人儿童之间的模型性能存在显著差异。

结果

与白人儿童的预测相比,PARS 对黑人儿童的预测具有更高的敏感性(.88 比.57),更低的特异性(.55 比.83),更高的 PPV(.42 比.33),但相似的 NPV(.93 比.93)。在 API 中,与白人儿童的预测相比,API 对黑人儿童的预测具有更高的敏感性(.63 比.53),相似的特异性(.81 比.80),更高的 PPV(.54 比.28),和更低的 NPV(.86 比.92)。

结论

总体而言,在 PARS 中,种族差异在模型诊断标准中以敏感性和特异性最为显著,但在 PARS 和 API 中,四个标准中的三个都存在种族差异。

相似文献

1
Racial Fairness in Precision Medicine: Pediatric Asthma Prediction Algorithms.精准医学中的种族公平性:儿科哮喘预测算法。
Am J Health Promot. 2023 Feb;37(2):239-242. doi: 10.1177/08901171221121639. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
2
A Pediatric Asthma Risk Score to better predict asthma development in young children.儿科哮喘风险评分,以更好地预测幼儿哮喘的发展。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019 May;143(5):1803-1810.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.09.037. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
3
Rethinking race/ethnicity, income, and childhood asthma: racial/ethnic disparities concentrated among the very poor.重新审视种族/族裔、收入与儿童哮喘:种族/族裔差异集中在极贫困人群中。
Public Health Rep. 2005 Mar-Apr;120(2):109-16. doi: 10.1177/003335490512000203.
4
Automated chart review utilizing natural language processing algorithm for asthma predictive index.利用自然语言处理算法进行自动化图表审查,以预测哮喘指数。
BMC Pulm Med. 2018 Feb 13;18(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12890-018-0593-9.
5
External validation of the Predicting Asthma Risk in Children tool in a clinical cohort.预测儿童哮喘风险工具的临床队列外部验证。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2022 Nov;57(11):2715-2723. doi: 10.1002/ppul.26088. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
6
Performance of the Pediatric Asthma Risk Score across Diverse Populations.儿科哮喘风险评分在不同人群中的表现。
NEJM Evid. 2023 Oct;2(10):EVIDoa2300026. doi: 10.1056/EVIDoa2300026. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
7
Explaining Racial Disparities in Child Asthma Readmission Using a Causal Inference Approach.使用因果推断方法解释儿童哮喘再入院中的种族差异。
JAMA Pediatr. 2016 Jul 1;170(7):695-703. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.0269.
8
Racial Fairness of Individual- and Community-Level Proxies of Socioeconomic Status Among Birthing Parent-Child Dyads.生育父母与子女二元组中社会经济地位的个体和社区层面代理指标的种族公平性
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024 Jun 25. doi: 10.1007/s40615-024-02050-9.
9
Expert artificial intelligence-based natural language processing characterises childhood asthma.基于人工智能的专家自然语言处理可以描述儿童哮喘。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2020 Feb;7(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2019-000524.
10
Predicting asthma in preschool children with asthma-like symptoms: validating and updating the PIAMA risk score.预测有哮喘样症状的学龄前儿童哮喘:验证和更新 PIAMA 风险评分。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013 Dec;132(6):1303-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.07.007. Epub 2013 Aug 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating precision medicine tools in cystic fibrosis for racial and ethnic fairness.评估囊性纤维化精准医疗工具在种族和民族公平性方面的情况。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 May 7;8(1):e94. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.532. eCollection 2024.
2
Racial Fairness of Individual- and Community-Level Proxies of Socioeconomic Status Among Birthing Parent-Child Dyads.生育父母与子女二元组中社会经济地位的个体和社区层面代理指标的种族公平性
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024 Jun 25. doi: 10.1007/s40615-024-02050-9.
3
Health disparities in allergic diseases.过敏性疾病的健康差异。
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2024 Apr 1;24(2):94-101. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000972. Epub 2024 Jan 30.