• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

处理调查数据中的粗心作答:预防、识别及推荐的最佳实践

Dealing with Careless Responding in Survey Data: Prevention, Identification, and Recommended Best Practices.

作者信息

Ward M K, Meade Adam W

机构信息

Tacoma, Washington, USA; email:

Department of Psychology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA; email:

出版信息

Annu Rev Psychol. 2023 Jan 18;74:577-596. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-040422-045007. Epub 2022 Aug 16.

DOI:10.1146/annurev-psych-040422-045007
PMID:35973734
Abstract

Surveys administered online have several benefits, but they are particularly prone to careless responding, which occurs when respondents fail to read item content or give sufficient attention, resulting in raw data that may not accurately reflect respondents' true levels of the constructs being measured. Careless responding can lead to various psychometric issues, potentially impacting any area of psychology that uses self-reported surveys and assessments. This review synthesizes the careless responding literature to provide a comprehensive understanding of careless responding and ways to prevent, identify, report, and clean careless responding from data sets. Further, we include recommendations for different levels of screening for careless responses. Finally, we highlight some of the most promising areas for future work on careless responding.

摘要

在线进行的调查有几个好处,但它们特别容易出现随意作答的情况,即受访者没有阅读题目内容或没有给予足够关注,从而导致原始数据可能无法准确反映受访者在所测量的构念上的真实水平。随意作答会导致各种心理测量问题,可能会影响使用自我报告调查和评估的心理学的任何领域。这篇综述综合了有关随意作答的文献,以全面了解随意作答以及从数据集中预防、识别、报告和清理随意作答的方法。此外,我们还包括针对不同随意作答筛查水平的建议。最后,我们强调了随意作答未来研究中一些最有前景的领域。

相似文献

1
Dealing with Careless Responding in Survey Data: Prevention, Identification, and Recommended Best Practices.处理调查数据中的粗心作答:预防、识别及推荐的最佳实践
Annu Rev Psychol. 2023 Jan 18;74:577-596. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-040422-045007. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
2
Careless responding in internet-based quality of life assessments.网络生活质量评估中的草率回应。
Qual Life Res. 2018 Apr;27(4):1077-1088. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1767-2. Epub 2017 Dec 16.
3
Using heterogeneous sources of data and interpretability of prediction models to explain the characteristics of careless respondents in survey data.利用异质数据源和预测模型的可解释性来解释调查数据中粗心应答者的特征。
Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 17;13(1):13417. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-40209-2.
4
Validating the IDRIS and IDRIA: Two infrequency/frequency scales for detecting careless and insufficient effort survey responders.验证 IDRIS 和 IDRIA:用于检测粗心和不充分努力的调查应答者的两种非频率/频率量表。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Oct;56(7):7790-7813. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02452-x. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
5
A little garbage in, lots of garbage out: Assessing the impact of careless responding in personality survey data.一入调查深似海,数据垃圾全都来:评估人格调查数据中草率作答的影响。
Behav Res Methods. 2020 Dec;52(6):2489-2505. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01401-8.
6
The Assessment and Impact of Careless Responding in Routine Outcome Monitoring within Mental Health Care.常规心理健康护理中的草率反应评估及其影响。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2019 Jul-Aug;54(4):593-611. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2018.1563520. Epub 2019 Apr 19.
7
A Response-Time-Based Latent Response Mixture Model for Identifying and Modeling Careless and Insufficient Effort Responding in Survey Data.基于反应时间的潜在反应混合模型在调查数据中识别和建模粗心及不充分努力反应
Psychometrika. 2022 Jun;87(2):593-619. doi: 10.1007/s11336-021-09817-7. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
8
An explanatory mixture IRT model for careless and insufficient effort responding in self-report measures.一种用于解释自陈量表中粗心和努力不足作答情况的混合IRT模型。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2022 Nov;75(3):668-698. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12272. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
9
Careless responding in online studies is associated with alcohol use: A mega-analysis.粗心作答与网络研究中的酒精使用有关:一项 mega 分析。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2024 Feb;38(1):56-64. doi: 10.1037/adb0000924. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
10
Accounting for careless and insufficient effort responding in large-scale survey data-development, evaluation, and application of a screen-time-based weighting procedure.在大规模调查数据中考虑粗心和不充分努力的回应——基于屏幕时间的加权程序的开发、评估和应用。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Feb;56(2):804-825. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-02053-6. Epub 2023 Mar 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Social support and self-management activation among older adult chronic disease patients in China: the chain mediating role of acceptance of illness and fatigue.中国老年慢性病患者的社会支持与自我管理激活:疾病接纳与疲劳的链式中介作用
Front Public Health. 2025 Aug 12;13:1637017. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1637017. eCollection 2025.
2
Time Perspective and Health Behaviors in Chronic Disease Patients: A Chain Mediation Model of Illness Perception via Temporal Self-Regulation Theory.慢性病患者的时间观念与健康行为:基于时间自我调节理论的疾病认知链式中介模型
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jul 22;15(8):996. doi: 10.3390/bs15080996.
3
The AUTNES Online Panel Study 2017-2024: A Dataset of Austrian Voter Attitudes and Behavior.
2017 - 2024年奥滕斯在线面板研究:奥地利选民态度与行为数据集
Sci Data. 2025 Aug 26;12(1):1487. doi: 10.1038/s41597-025-05848-2.
4
Psychometric properties and qualitative evaluation of a Swedish translation of the New Sexual Satisfaction Scale-Short (NSSS-S).新性满意度量表简版(NSSS-S)瑞典语翻译版的心理测量特性及质性评价
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 25;20(8):e0330353. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330353. eCollection 2025.
5
Assessing medical students' competency before and after clinical rotations: a single-center pilot study in China.评估医学生临床轮转前后的能力:中国一项单中心试点研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Aug 22;25(1):1183. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07735-1.
6
Increasing Rigor in Online Health Surveys Through the Reduction of Fraudulent Data.通过减少欺诈性数据提高在线健康调查的严谨性。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 21;27:e68092. doi: 10.2196/68092.
7
Digital Well-Being Training With Health Care Professionals: A Randomized Clinical Trial.与医疗保健专业人员进行的数字健康培训:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2025 Aug 18. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.3888.
8
Correlates of climate change distress: The difference to general distress.气候变化困扰的相关因素:与一般困扰的差异。
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2025 Jul-Sep;25(3):100613. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2025.100613. Epub 2025 Aug 5.
9
Straightlining prevalence across domains of social media use and impact on internal consistency and mental health associations in the LifeOnSoMe study.在LifeOnSoMe研究中,社交媒体使用各领域的患病率直线化及其对内部一致性和心理健康关联的影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 7;15(1):28990. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-14276-6.
10
Bringing back psychological empowerment in empowerment-oriented leadership: the development of the Psychological Empowerment Leadership Scale (PELS).在以赋权为导向的领导中重拾心理赋权:心理赋权领导量表(PELS)的开发。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 22;16:1539085. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1539085. eCollection 2025.