Schermuly Carsten C, Algner Mona, Lorenz Timo
Institute for New Work and Coaching, SRH University Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Department of Psychology, Medical School Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 22;16:1539085. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1539085. eCollection 2025.
Empowering leadership has garnered significant attention over the past two decades, driven by the evolving dynamics of organizations. However, current measures of empowering leadership often fail to align with the psychological empowerment construct (Spreitzer, 1995) - the very construct these leadership practices claim to impact - and exhibit some psychometric flaws. To address these issues, we introduce the Psychological Empowerment Leadership Scale (PELS), designed to assess leader behaviors fostering psychological empowerment across six dimensions. We used automated item selection algorithms to ensure high psychometric quality and tested the instrument's validity and measurement invariance in German and US samples. A second study with two measurement points, assessed the criterion-oriented validity of the PELS. Confirmatory factor analyses support its factorial validity and indicate metric measurement invariance across both countries. The PELS shows strong correlations with psychological empowerment, job satisfaction, and emotional exhaustion, often exceeding previous meta-analyses, thus demonstrating criterion validity. However, its association with innovative behaviors was lower than expected, warranting further research. With only 24 items, the PELS, offers high reliability and stability over time, providing a more efficient tool for assessing empowering leadership and aligning better with contemporary theoretical perspectives. This research refines the conceptualization and assessment of empowering leadership in contemporary organizational contexts.
在组织动态不断演变的推动下,赋能型领导在过去二十年中受到了广泛关注。然而,当前对赋能型领导的衡量方法往往与心理赋能结构(斯普雷itzer,1995)不一致,而这些领导行为声称会对该结构产生影响,并且还存在一些心理测量缺陷。为了解决这些问题,我们引入了心理赋能领导量表(PELS),旨在从六个维度评估促进心理赋能的领导行为。我们使用自动项目选择算法来确保高心理测量质量,并在德国和美国样本中测试了该工具的有效性和测量不变性。第二项研究设置了两个测量点,评估了PELS的标准导向效度。验证性因素分析支持其因素效度,并表明两国之间具有度量测量不变性。PELS与心理赋能、工作满意度和情感耗竭之间显示出很强的相关性,通常超过以往的元分析,从而证明了标准效度。然而,它与创新行为的关联低于预期,需要进一步研究。PELS仅有24个项目,随着时间的推移具有很高的信度和稳定性,为评估赋能型领导提供了一个更有效的工具,并且与当代理论观点更相符。这项研究完善了当代组织背景下赋能型领导的概念化和评估。