Heart Rhythm Management Centre, Postgraduate Program in Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussel, Belgium.
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussel, Belgium.
Am J Cardiol. 2022 Oct 15;181:45-54. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.07.011. Epub 2022 Aug 13.
Management of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) beyond implantable cardioverter-defibrillator positioning in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is challenging. Catheter ablation of the ventricular substrate often requires a combination of endocardial and epicardial approaches, with disappointing outcomes due to the progressive nature of the disease. We report the Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel experience through a case series of 16 patients with drug-refractory ARVC, who have undergone endocardial and/or epicardial catheter ablation of VAs with a thoracoscopic hybrid-approach. After a mean follow-up time of 5.16 years (SD 2.9 years) from the first hybrid-approach ablation, VA recurrence was observed in 5 patients (31.25%): among these, patients 4 patients (80%) received a previous ablation and 1 of 11 patients (9.09%) who had a hybrid ablation as first approach had a VA recurrence (80% vs 9.09%; log-rank p = 0.04). Despite the recurrence rate of arrhythmic events, all patients had a significant reduction in the arrhythmic burden after ablation, with a mean of 4.65 years (SD 2.9 years) of freedom from clinically significant arrhythmias, defined as symptomatic VAs or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator-delivered therapies. In conclusion, our case series confirms that management of VAs in patients with ARVC is difficult because patients do not always respond to antiarrhythmic medications and can require multiple invasive procedures. A multidisciplinary approach involving cardiologists, cardiac surgeons, and cardiac electrophysiologists, together with recent cardiac mapping techniques and ablation tools, might mitigate these difficulties and improve outcomes.
在致心律失常性右心室心肌病 (ARVC) 患者中,除植入式心律转复除颤器定位外,对室性心律失常 (VA) 的管理具有挑战性。由于疾病的进行性,通常需要结合心内膜和心外膜方法来消融心室基质,但结果并不理想。我们通过对 16 例药物难治性 ARVC 患者的病例系列研究,报告了布鲁塞尔大学医院的经验,这些患者接受了经胸腔镜杂交方法的心内膜和/或心外膜导管消融 VA。在首次杂交消融后平均 5.16 年(标准差 2.9 年)的随访期间,5 例患者(31.25%)出现 VA 复发:其中,4 例患者(80%)接受了先前的消融,11 例患者(9.09%)接受了首次杂交消融的患者中有 1 例(80% vs 9.09%;log-rank p = 0.04)出现 VA 复发。尽管心律失常事件的复发率较高,但所有患者在消融后心律失常负担均显著减轻,平均 4.65 年(标准差 2.9 年)无临床显著心律失常,定义为有症状的 VA 或植入式心律转复除颤器治疗。总之,我们的病例系列研究证实,ARVC 患者的 VA 管理具有挑战性,因为并非所有患者均对抗心律失常药物有反应,并且可能需要多次侵入性手术。多学科方法包括心脏病专家、心脏外科医生和心脏电生理学家,以及最近的心脏标测技术和消融工具,可能会减轻这些困难并改善结局。