• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在实验室贿赂任务中没有道德许可的证据。

No evidence of moral licensing in a laboratory bribe-taking task.

机构信息

Faculty of Business Administration, Prague University of Economics and Business, náměstí Winstona Churchilla 4, Prague, 130 67, Czech Republic.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 16;12(1):13860. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16800-4.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-16800-4
PMID:35974027
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9381568/
Abstract

Moral licensing posits that previous moral acts increase the probability of behaving immorally in the future. According to this perspective, rejecting bribes, even because they are too small, would create a kind of "license" for taking (presumably larger) bribes in the future. On the other hand, the desire for consistency in behavior predicts that previous rejection of bribes will increase the probability of rejection for bribes offered in the future. Using a laboratory task modeling the decision to take a bribe, we examined how resisting and succumbing to the temptation to take a bribe affects later bribe-taking. Participants (N = 297) were offered either low bribes first and high bribes later or vice versa. Low bribes were in general rejected more often and the results showed some weak, nonsignificant evidence that bribe-taking may be influenced by the order of the sizes of offered bribes. However, there was no evidence of an increased probability of taking bribes after being offered the low bribes first and thus no evidence in support of the moral licensing effect.

摘要

道德许可假设先前的道德行为会增加未来不道德行为的可能性。根据这一观点,拒绝贿赂,即使是因为贿赂太小,也会为未来接受(据推测更大的)贿赂创造一种“许可”。另一方面,行为一致性的愿望预测先前拒绝贿赂会增加未来拒绝提供的贿赂的可能性。我们使用一种模拟接受贿赂决策的实验室任务来检验抵制和屈服于接受贿赂的诱惑如何影响以后的受贿行为。参与者(N=297)首先被提供低贿赂,然后是高贿赂,或者相反。低贿赂通常被拒绝的频率更高,结果表明一些微弱的、不显著的证据表明,贿赂的接受可能受到提供的贿赂数额的顺序的影响。然而,没有证据表明在被提供低贿赂后接受贿赂的可能性增加,因此没有证据支持道德许可效应。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/695b/9381568/0e44c776220f/41598_2022_16800_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/695b/9381568/0e6ed880ddc2/41598_2022_16800_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/695b/9381568/0e44c776220f/41598_2022_16800_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/695b/9381568/0e6ed880ddc2/41598_2022_16800_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/695b/9381568/0e44c776220f/41598_2022_16800_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
No evidence of moral licensing in a laboratory bribe-taking task.在实验室贿赂任务中没有道德许可的证据。
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 16;12(1):13860. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16800-4.
2
Predictors of Bribe-Taking: The Role of Bribe Size and Personality.受贿的预测因素:贿赂规模与人格的作用。
Front Psychol. 2018 Sep 10;9:1511. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01511. eCollection 2018.
3
Neural correlates of bribe-taking decision dilemma: An fNIRS study.受贿决策困境的神经关联:一项近红外光谱研究。
Brain Cogn. 2023 Mar;166:105951. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2023.105951. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
4
Norm, gender, and bribe-giving: Insights from a behavioral game.规范、性别与行贿:行为博弈的见解
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):e0189995. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189995. eCollection 2017.
5
Perturbation of Right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Makes Power Holders Less Resistant to Tempting Bribes.右侧背外侧前额叶皮层的干扰使掌权者更难抵制诱人的贿赂。
Psychol Sci. 2022 Mar;33(3):412-423. doi: 10.1177/09567976211042379. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
6
Role of Guanxi (interpersonal relationship) in bribe-taking behaviors: evidence from China.关系(人际关系)在受贿行为中的作用:来自中国的证据。
Curr Psychol. 2023 Mar 10:1-16. doi: 10.1007/s12144-023-04486-4.
7
Neural basis of corruption in power-holders.掌权者腐败的神经基础。
Elife. 2021 Mar 24;10:e63922. doi: 10.7554/eLife.63922.
8
Does governmental corruption aid or hamper early moral development? Insights from the Dominican Republic and United States contexts.政府腐败对早期道德发展是有帮助还是有阻碍?来自多米尼加共和国和美国背景的观点。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2024 Nov;153(11):2810-2821. doi: 10.1037/xge0001664. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
9
An indecent proposal: the dual functions of indirect speech.一个不正当的提议:间接引语的双重功能。
Cogn Sci. 2015 Jan;39(1):199-211. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12145. Epub 2014 Jul 31.
10
Does moral commitment predict resistance to corruption? experimental evidence from a bribery game.道德承诺能否预测对腐败的抵制?贿赂游戏的实验证据。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 11;17(1):e0262201. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262201. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the Impact of Sustainability Trade-Offs: The Role of Product and Sustainability Types in Consumer Purchases Mediated by Moral Regulation.探索可持续性权衡的影响:产品和可持续性类型在道德规范介导的消费者购买行为中的作用。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Aug 12;14(8):702. doi: 10.3390/bs14080702.
2
Moral judgement and decision-making: theoretical predictions and null results.道德判断与决策:理论预测与零结果。
Sci Rep. 2023 May 11;13(1):7688. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-34899-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Logistic or linear? Estimating causal effects of experimental treatments on binary outcomes using regression analysis.逻辑斯蒂回归还是线性回归?使用回归分析估计二分类结局的实验处理的因果效应
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021 Apr;150(4):700-709. doi: 10.1037/xge0000920. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
2
Intuitive Honesty Versus Dishonesty: Meta-Analytic Evidence.直觉诚实与不诚实:元分析证据。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2019 Sep;14(5):778-796. doi: 10.1177/1745691619851778. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
3
The truth about lies: A meta-analysis on dishonest behavior.关于谎言的真相:不诚实行为的元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2019 Jan;145(1):1-44. doi: 10.1037/bul0000174.
4
Ethical Free Riding: When Honest People Find Dishonest Partners.道德搭便车:当诚实的人找到不诚实的伙伴时。
Psychol Sci. 2018 Dec;29(12):1956-1968. doi: 10.1177/0956797618796480. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
5
Predictors of Bribe-Taking: The Role of Bribe Size and Personality.受贿的预测因素:贿赂规模与人格的作用。
Front Psychol. 2018 Sep 10;9:1511. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01511. eCollection 2018.
6
Three Principles to REVISE People's Unethical Behavior.三条修正不道德行为的原则
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015 Nov;10(6):738-41. doi: 10.1177/1745691615598512.
7
Consistency Versus Licensing Effects of Past Moral Behavior.过去道德行为的一致性与许可效应。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2016;67:363-85. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115120. Epub 2015 Sep 17.
8
Justifications shape ethical blind spots.理由形成道德盲点。
Psychol Sci. 2015 Jun;26(6):794-804. doi: 10.1177/0956797615571018. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
9
A meta-analytic review of moral licensing.道德许可的元分析综述。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2015 Apr;41(4):540-58. doi: 10.1177/0146167215572134. Epub 2015 Feb 25.
10
Random effects structure for testing interactions in linear mixed-effects models.线性混合效应模型中用于检验交互作用的随机效应结构。
Front Psychol. 2013 Jun 5;4:328. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00328. eCollection 2013.