• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将可委托的专业活动纳入研究员理事会认可的项目中:一个试点项目。

Implementation of entrustable professional activities into fellowship council accredited programs: a pilot project.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, McGill University, 1650 Cedar Ave, D6-136, Montreal, QC, H3G 1A4, Canada.

Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, H3A 0G4, Canada.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2023 Apr;37(4):3191-3200. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09502-5. Epub 2022 Aug 16.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-022-09502-5
PMID:35974253
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9381155/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Fellowship Council (FC) is transitioning to a competency-based medical education (CBME) model, including the introduction of Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) for training and assessment of Fellows. This study describes the implementation process employed by the FC during a ten-month pilot project and presents data regarding feasibility and perceived value.

METHODS

The FC coordinated the development of EPAs in collaboration with the sponsoring societies for Advanced GI/MIS, Bariatrics, Foregut, Endoscopy and Hepatopancreaticobiliary (HPB) fellowships encompassing the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative phases of care for key competencies. Fifteen accredited fellowship programs participated in this project. The assessments were collected through a unique platform on the FC website. Programs were asked to convene a Clinical Competency Committee (CCC) on a quarterly basis. The pilot group met monthly to support and improve the process. An exit survey evaluated the perceived value of EPAs.

RESULTS

The 15 participating programs included 18 fellows and 106 faculty. A total of 655 assessments were initiated with 429 (65%) completed. The average (SD) number of EPAs completed for each fellow was 24(18); range 0-72. Intraoperative EPAs were preferentially completed (71%). The average(SD) time for both the fellow and faculty to complete an EPA was 27(78) hours. Engagement increased from 39% of fellows completing at least one EPA in September to 72% in December and declining to 50% in May. Entrustment level increased from 6% of EPAs evaluated as "Practice Ready" in September to 75% in June. The exit survey was returned by 63% of faculty and 72% of fellows. Overall, 46% of fellows and 74% of program directors recommended full-scale implementation of the EPA framework.

CONCLUSION

A competency-based assessment framework was developed by the FC and piloted in several programs. Participation was variable and required ongoing strategies to address barriers. The pilot project has prepared the FC to introduce CBME across all FC training programs.

摘要

目的

研究员理事会(FC)正在向基于能力的医学教育(CBME)模式过渡,包括引入可委托的专业活动(EPAs)来培训和评估研究员。本研究描述了 FC 在为期十个月的试点项目中采用的实施过程,并介绍了关于可行性和感知价值的数据。

方法

FC 与高级胃肠/微创、减重、前肠、内镜和肝胆胰(HPB)研究员的赞助协会合作,协调了 EPAs 的开发,涵盖了关键能力的术前、术中和术后护理阶段。十五个认可的研究员计划参与了该项目。评估是通过 FC 网站上的一个独特平台收集的。项目被要求每季度召开一次临床能力委员会(CCC)会议。试点组每月开会以支持和改进该过程。一项退出调查评估了 EPA 的感知价值。

结果

参与的 15 个项目包括 18 名研究员和 106 名教师。共启动了 655 次评估,其中 429 次(65%)完成。每位研究员完成的平均(SD)EPA 数量为 24(18);范围 0-72。优先完成了术中 EPA(71%)。研究员和教师完成 EPA 的平均(SD)时间分别为 27(78)小时。参与度从 9 月至少有一名研究员完成一项 EPA 的 39%增加到 12 月的 72%,然后下降到 5 月的 50%。在 9 月评估为“准备执业”的 EPA 中,可委托级别从 6%增加到 6 月的 75%。共有 63%的教师和 72%的研究员返回了退出调查。总体而言,46%的研究员和 74%的项目主任建议全面实施 EPA 框架。

结论

FC 开发了基于能力的评估框架,并在几个项目中进行了试点。参与度各不相同,需要采取持续策略来解决障碍。试点项目为 FC 在所有 FC 培训计划中引入 CBME 做好了准备。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1144/9381155/06134be5673d/464_2022_9502_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1144/9381155/4a1bba02b117/464_2022_9502_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1144/9381155/98241f3f46b7/464_2022_9502_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1144/9381155/06134be5673d/464_2022_9502_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1144/9381155/4a1bba02b117/464_2022_9502_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1144/9381155/98241f3f46b7/464_2022_9502_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1144/9381155/06134be5673d/464_2022_9502_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Implementation of entrustable professional activities into fellowship council accredited programs: a pilot project.将可委托的专业活动纳入研究员理事会认可的项目中:一个试点项目。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Apr;37(4):3191-3200. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09502-5. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
2
Implementation of Entrustable Professional Activities in General Surgery: Results of a National Pilot Study.外科医生可托付性活动的实施:一项全国试点研究的结果。
Ann Surg. 2023 Oct 1;278(4):578-586. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005991. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
3
Use of Milestones and Development of Entrustable Professional Activities in 2 Hematology/Oncology Training Programs.2个血液学/肿瘤学培训项目中里程碑的使用及可托付专业活动的发展
J Grad Med Educ. 2015 Mar;7(1):101-4. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-14-00283.1.
4
Development and Pilot Testing of Entrustable Professional Activities for US Anesthesiology Residency Training.美国麻醉学住院医师培训可托付专业活动的开发与试点测试
Anesth Analg. 2021 Jun 1;132(6):1579-1591. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005434.
5
SAGES Advanced GI/MIS fellowship redesign: pilot results and adoption of new standards.SAGES 高级胃肠/微创外科奖学金重新设计:试点结果和新标准的采用。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Sep;33(9):3056-3061. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06899-4. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
6
Decision-Making Confidence of Clinical Competency Committees for Entrustable Professional Activities.临床能力委员会对可委托专业活动的决策信心。
JAMA Surg. 2024 Jul 1;159(7):801-808. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.0809.
7
Pediatric Emergency Medicine Fellowship Program Directors' Viewpoint: Minimum Levels of Entrustment for Graduating Fellows and Practicing Physicians to Perform the Subspecialty's Professional Activities.儿科急诊医学奖学金项目主任的观点:毕业学员和执业医师从事该亚专业专业活动的最低委托水平。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2023 Aug 1;39(8):574-579. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000002817. Epub 2022 Aug 6.
8
Entrust Me: Embedding Entrustable Professional Activities in a Gastroenterology Residency Program.《托付于我:将可托付专业活动融入胃肠病学住院医师培训项目》
Dig Dis Sci. 2023 Feb;68(2):352-356. doi: 10.1007/s10620-022-07815-y. Epub 2023 Jan 7.
9
Implementing an entrustable professional activities programmatic assessments for nurse practitioner training in emergency care: A pilot study.在急诊护理中实施可委托的专业活动计划评估护士从业者培训:一项试点研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2022 Aug;115:105409. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105409. Epub 2022 May 24.
10
Validity of Level of Supervision Scales for Assessing Pediatric Fellows on the Common Pediatric Subspecialty Entrustable Professional Activities.用于评估儿科住院医师在常见儿科亚专业可托付专业活动中的监督水平量表的有效性。
Acad Med. 2018 Feb;93(2):283-291. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001820.

引用本文的文献

1
Investigating the Roles and Impact of Clinical Competency Committees in Graduate Medical Education: A Narrative Review.探究临床能力委员会在毕业后医学教育中的作用及影响:一项叙述性综述
J Grad Med Educ. 2024 Dec;16(6):662-683. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-24-00017.1. Epub 2024 Dec 13.
2
Resident and Fellow Performance and Supervision in Surgical Oncology Procedures.外科肿瘤学手术中的住院医师和研究员表现及监督
J Am Coll Surg. 2024 Dec 1;239(6):528-537. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000001131. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
3
Entrustable Professional Activities in Surgery: A Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Competency-based Surgical Training and Entrusted Professional Activities - Perfect Match or a Procrustean Bed?基于胜任力的外科培训与委托专业活动——完美匹配还是普罗克汝斯忒斯之床?
Ann Surg. 2021 May 1;273(5):e173-e175. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004521.
2
Implementation of Entrustable Professional Activities into a General Surgery Residency.将可委托专业活动纳入普通外科住院医师培训中。
J Surg Educ. 2020 Jul-Aug;77(4):739-748. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.01.012. Epub 2020 Feb 8.
3
Competency-based resident education: The United States perspective.
手术中的可委托专业活动:综述。
JAMA Surg. 2024 May 1;159(5):571-577. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.8107.
4
"Doing well": Intraoperative entrustable professional activity assessments provided limited technical feedback.“表现良好”:术中可托付专业活动评估提供的技术反馈有限。
Surg Open Sci. 2024 Feb 24;18:93-97. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2024.02.008. eCollection 2024 Mar.
基于能力的住院医师教育:美国视角。
Surgery. 2020 May;167(5):777-781. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.05.059. Epub 2019 Aug 3.
4
Entrustable Professional Activities in General Surgery: Development and Implementation.普通外科的可委托专业活动:发展与实施。
J Surg Educ. 2019 Sep-Oct;76(5):1174-1186. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.04.003. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
5
Entrustable Professional Activities: The Future of Competency-based Education in Surgery May Already Be Here.可托付专业活动:外科学基于胜任力教育的未来可能已然到来。
Ann Surg. 2019 Mar;269(3):407-408. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003153.
6
Perceptions on Competence by Design in urology.泌尿外科基于设计的能力认知
Can Urol Assoc J. 2019 Jul;13(7):E183-E189. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.5610.
7
Describing the Journey and Lessons Learned Implementing a Competency-Based, Time-Variable Undergraduate Medical Education Curriculum.描述实施基于能力、时间可变的本科医学教育课程的历程和经验教训。
Acad Med. 2018 Mar;93(3S Competency-Based, Time-Variable Education in the Health Professions):S42-S48. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002068.
8
Implementing Competency-Based Medical Education in a Postgraduate Family Medicine Residency Training Program: A Stepwise Approach, Facilitating Factors, and Processes or Steps That Would Have Been Helpful.在研究生家庭医学住院医师培训项目中实施基于胜任力的医学教育:一种循序渐进的方法、促进因素以及可能有用的流程或步骤
Acad Med. 2016 May;91(5):685-9. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001066.
9
What is wrong with the training of general surgery?普通外科培训存在什么问题?
Adv Surg. 2014;48:201-10. doi: 10.1016/j.yasu.2014.05.010.
10
Nuts and bolts of entrustable professional activities.可托付专业活动的基本要素。
J Grad Med Educ. 2013 Mar;5(1):157-8. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-12-00380.1.