• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于反应和毒性亚组特定效用的贝叶斯治疗筛选和选择。

Bayesian treatment screening and selection using subgroup-specific utilities of response and toxicity.

机构信息

Department of Statistics, Baskin School of Engineering, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California, USA.

Department of Biostatistics, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.

出版信息

Biometrics. 2023 Sep;79(3):2458-2473. doi: 10.1111/biom.13738. Epub 2022 Sep 19.

DOI:10.1111/biom.13738
PMID:35974457
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9931950/
Abstract

A Bayesian design is proposed for randomized phase II clinical trials that screen multiple experimental treatments compared to an active control based on ordinal categorical toxicity and response. The underlying model and design account for patient heterogeneity characterized by ordered prognostic subgroups. All decision criteria are subgroup specific, including interim rules for dropping unsafe or ineffective treatments, and criteria for selecting optimal treatments at the end of the trial. The design requires an elicited utility function of the two outcomes that varies with the subgroups. Final treatment selections are based on posterior mean utilities. The methodology is illustrated by a trial of targeted agents for metastatic renal cancer, which motivated the design methodology. In the context of this application, the design is evaluated by computer simulation, including comparison to three designs that conduct separate trials within subgroups, or conduct one trial while ignoring subgroups, or base treatment selection on estimated response rates while ignoring toxicity.

摘要

提出了一种贝叶斯设计,用于针对基于有序分类毒性和反应的活性对照比较的多个实验治疗进行随机二期临床试验筛选。基础模型和设计考虑了以有序预后亚组为特征的患者异质性。所有决策标准都是特定于亚组的,包括不安全或无效治疗的中期淘汰规则,以及试验结束时选择最佳治疗的标准。该设计需要一个与亚组相关的两个结果的诱发效用函数。最终的治疗选择基于后验均值效用。该方法通过转移性肾细胞癌的靶向药物试验进行了说明,该试验激发了设计方法。在这种情况下,通过计算机模拟对设计进行了评估,包括与在亚组内进行单独试验、或进行一次试验而忽略亚组、或基于毒性忽略反应率进行治疗选择的三种设计进行比较。

相似文献

1
Bayesian treatment screening and selection using subgroup-specific utilities of response and toxicity.基于反应和毒性亚组特定效用的贝叶斯治疗筛选和选择。
Biometrics. 2023 Sep;79(3):2458-2473. doi: 10.1111/biom.13738. Epub 2022 Sep 19.
2
Precision Bayesian phase I-II dose-finding based on utilities tailored to prognostic subgroups.基于针对预后亚组定制的效用的精准贝叶斯 I- II 期剂量发现。
Stat Med. 2021 Oct 30;40(24):5199-5217. doi: 10.1002/sim.9120. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Bayesian cancer clinical trial designs with subgroup-specific decisions.贝叶斯癌症临床试验设计与亚组特异性决策。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2020 Mar;90:105860. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2019.105860. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
5
An adaptive trial design to optimize dose-schedule regimes with delayed outcomes.一种优化具有延迟结局的剂量方案的自适应试验设计。
Biometrics. 2020 Mar;76(1):304-315. doi: 10.1111/biom.13116. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
6
Risk-benefit trade-offs and precision utilities in phase I-II clinical trials.I 期和 II 期临床试验中的风险-效益权衡和精准效用。
Clin Trials. 2024 Jun;21(3):287-297. doi: 10.1177/17407745231214750. Epub 2023 Dec 18.
7
Subgroup-specific dose finding for phase I-II trials using Bayesian clustering.基于贝叶斯聚类的 I/II 期临床试验亚组特异性剂量探索。
Stat Med. 2022 Jul 20;41(16):3164-3179. doi: 10.1002/sim.9410. Epub 2022 Apr 16.
8
A Bayesian Hybrid Adaptive Randomisation Design for Clinical Trials with Survival Outcomes.用于生存结局临床试验的贝叶斯混合自适应随机化设计
Methods Inf Med. 2016;55(1):4-13. doi: 10.3414/ME14-01-0132. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
9
A simulation study of methods for selecting subgroup-specific doses in phase 1 trials.1期试验中选择亚组特异性剂量方法的模拟研究。
Pharm Stat. 2017 Mar;16(2):143-156. doi: 10.1002/pst.1797. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
10
Accelerating clinical development of HIV vaccine strategies: methodological challenges and considerations in constructing an optimised multi-arm phase I/II trial design.加速 HIV 疫苗策略的临床开发:构建优化的多臂 I/II 期试验设计中的方法学挑战和考虑因素。
Trials. 2014 Feb 26;15:68. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-68.

引用本文的文献

1
Bayesian Safety and Futility Monitoring in Phase II Trials Using One Utility-Based Rule.基于单效用规则的 II 期临床试验贝叶斯安全性和无效性监测。
Stat Med. 2024 Dec 20;43(29):5583-5595. doi: 10.1002/sim.10254. Epub 2024 Nov 5.
2
Adaptive phase I-II clinical trial designs identifying optimal biological doses for targeted agents and immunotherapies.适用于靶向药物和免疫疗法的最佳生物剂量的适应性 I- II 期临床试验设计。
Clin Trials. 2024 Jun;21(3):298-307. doi: 10.1177/17407745231220661. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
3
Risk-benefit trade-offs and precision utilities in phase I-II clinical trials.

本文引用的文献

1
Precision Bayesian phase I-II dose-finding based on utilities tailored to prognostic subgroups.基于针对预后亚组定制的效用的精准贝叶斯 I- II 期剂量发现。
Stat Med. 2021 Oct 30;40(24):5199-5217. doi: 10.1002/sim.9120. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
2
Making Patient-Specific Treatment Decisions Using Prognostic Variables and Utilities of Clinical Outcomes.利用预后变量和临床结局效用制定个体化治疗决策。
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jun 1;13(11):2741. doi: 10.3390/cancers13112741.
3
Platform Trials - Beware the Noncomparable Control Group.平台试验——谨防不可比的对照组。
I 期和 II 期临床试验中的风险-效益权衡和精准效用。
Clin Trials. 2024 Jun;21(3):287-297. doi: 10.1177/17407745231214750. Epub 2023 Dec 18.
4
Interpreting Randomized Controlled Trials.解读随机对照试验
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Sep 22;15(19):4674. doi: 10.3390/cancers15194674.
5
Novel Clinical Trial Designs with Dose Optimization to Improve Long-term Outcomes.具有剂量优化的新型临床试验设计以改善长期结局。
Clin Cancer Res. 2023 Nov 14;29(22):4549-4554. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-23-2222.
6
Less is More? First Impressions From COSMIC-313.少即是多?来自COSMIC-313的初步印象
Cancer Invest. 2023 Jan;41(1):101-106. doi: 10.1080/07357907.2022.2136681. Epub 2022 Oct 25.
N Engl J Med. 2021 Apr 22;384(16):1572-1573. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2102446.
4
Lenvatinib plus Pembrolizumab or Everolimus for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma.仑伐替尼联合帕博利珠单抗或依维莫司治疗晚期肾细胞癌。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Apr 8;384(14):1289-1300. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2035716. Epub 2021 Feb 13.
5
Recent advancements in the treatment of metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma: A review of the evidence using second-generation p-values.转移性透明细胞肾细胞癌治疗的最新进展:使用第二代p值的证据综述
Cancer Treat Res Commun. 2020;23:100166. doi: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2020.100166. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
6
Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib in first-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma: extended follow-up of efficacy and safety results from a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial.纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹单抗对比舒尼替尼用于晚期肾细胞癌的一线治疗:来自一项随机、对照、III 期临床试验的疗效和安全性结果的扩展随访。
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Oct;20(10):1370-1385. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30413-9. Epub 2019 Aug 16.
7
Temsirolimus versus Pazopanib (TemPa) in Patients with Advanced Clear-cell Renal Cell Carcinoma and Poor-risk Features: A Randomized Phase II Trial.替西罗莫司对比帕唑帕尼(TemPa)用于治疗晚期肾透明细胞癌且伴有高危特征的患者:一项随机的 II 期试验。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2020 Oct;3(5):687-694. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2019.06.004. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
8
Optimizing natural killer cell doses for heterogeneous cancer patients on the basis of multiple event times.基于多个事件时间为异质性癌症患者优化自然杀伤细胞剂量。
J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat. 2019 Feb;68(2):461-474. doi: 10.1111/rssc.12271. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
9
Pembrolizumab plus Axitinib versus Sunitinib for Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma.派姆单抗联合阿昔替尼对比舒尼替尼用于晚期肾细胞癌。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Mar 21;380(12):1116-1127. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1816714. Epub 2019 Feb 16.
10
Subgroup-specific dose finding in phase I clinical trials based on time to toxicity allowing adaptive subgroup combination.基于毒性发生时间的I期临床试验中特定亚组的剂量探索,允许适应性亚组组合。
Pharm Stat. 2018 Nov;17(6):734-749. doi: 10.1002/pst.1891. Epub 2018 Aug 15.