Suppr超能文献

在新冠疫情期间,亲社会行为或信任哪一个能更好地预测居家行为?

Does pro-sociality or trust better predict staying home behavior during the Covid-19?

作者信息

Umer Hamza

机构信息

Institute of Economic Research (IER), Hitotsubashi University, Tokyo, Japan.

International Research Fellow, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS), Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

J Behav Exp Econ. 2022 Oct;100:101926. doi: 10.1016/j.socec.2022.101926. Epub 2022 Aug 12.

Abstract

Voluntary compliance of preventive and mitigation measures due to social concerns can play a crucial role in slowing down the spread of the Covid-19. The existing economic models for disease spread however do not direct a lot of focus on the possible role of pro-social behavior and general trust in predicting preventive behaviors amid the Covid-19. Therefore, this study analyzes whether pro-sociality and general trust measured in the short run (2020 and 2019) and in the long run (2015 and 2010) predict attitudes towards the stay home behavior and the intended stay home behavior in case the government mandates it due to the Covid-19 in the Netherlands. The results suggest that these preferences positively influence attitudes towards staying home behavior. However, trust in comparison to pro-sociality is a stable and robust predictor of stay home attitudes both in the short as well as long run. On the other hand, neither trust nor pro-sociality influences the intended stay home behavior in case the government mandates the lockdown, and it is most likely due to the timing of the survey coinciding with a significant drop in the Covid-19 infections and easing out of the lockdown restrictions by the Dutch government.

摘要

出于社会关切而自愿遵守预防和缓解措施,在减缓新冠病毒传播方面可发挥关键作用。然而,现有的疾病传播经济模型并未过多关注亲社会行为和普遍信任在预测新冠疫情期间预防行为方面可能发挥的作用。因此,本研究分析了短期内(2020年和2019年)以及长期内(2015年和2010年)衡量的亲社会性和普遍信任,是否能预测荷兰民众对于居家行为的态度,以及在政府因新冠疫情强制要求居家时的预期居家行为。结果表明,这些偏好对居家行为的态度有积极影响。然而,与亲社会性相比,信任在短期和长期都是居家态度的稳定且有力的预测指标。另一方面,在政府强制实施封锁的情况下,信任和亲社会性均未影响预期的居家行为,这很可能是因为调查时间恰逢荷兰新冠感染人数大幅下降以及政府放宽封锁限制。

相似文献

1
Does pro-sociality or trust better predict staying home behavior during the Covid-19?
J Behav Exp Econ. 2022 Oct;100:101926. doi: 10.1016/j.socec.2022.101926. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
2
Stability of pro-sociality and trust amid the Covid-19: panel data from the Netherlands.
Empirica (Dordr). 2023;50(1):255-287. doi: 10.1007/s10663-022-09557-6. Epub 2023 Jan 9.
4
Dutch COVID-19 lockdown measures increased trust in government and trust in science: A difference-in-differences analysis.
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Apr;275:113819. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113819. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
5
How the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic impacted pro-social behaviour and individual preferences: Experimental evidence from China.
J Econ Behav Organ. 2021 Oct;190:480-494. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2021.08.001. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
6
Association Between Trust in Government and Practice of Preventive Measures During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan.
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Nov;36(11):3471-3477. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06959-3. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
7
In science we (should) trust: Expectations and compliance across nine countries during the COVID-19 pandemic.
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 4;16(6):e0252892. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252892. eCollection 2021.
8
Measuring voluntary and policy-induced social distancing behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Apr 20;118(16). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2008814118.
9
Predictors of COVID-19 voluntary compliance behaviors: An international investigation.
Glob Transit. 2020;2:76-82. doi: 10.1016/j.glt.2020.06.003. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
10
Psychological Impact and Compliance with Staying at Home of the Public to COVID-19 Outbreak during Chinese Spring Festival.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 14;19(2):916. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19020916.

引用本文的文献

1
Investigating the relationship of COVID-19 preventive and mitigation measures with mosque attendance in Pakistan.
PLoS One. 2023 Dec 4;18(12):e0294808. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294808. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Stability of pro-sociality and trust amid the Covid-19: panel data from the Netherlands.
Empirica (Dordr). 2023;50(1):255-287. doi: 10.1007/s10663-022-09557-6. Epub 2023 Jan 9.
2
Prosociality predicts individual behavior and collective outcomes in the COVID-19 pandemic.
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Sep;308:115192. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115192. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
3
Economic preferences and compliance in the social stress test of the COVID-19 crisis.
J Public Econ. 2021 Feb;194:104322. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104322. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
4
Asocial capital: Civic culture and social distancing during COVID-19.
J Public Econ. 2021 Feb;194:104342. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104342. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
5
Different roles of interpersonal trust and institutional trust in COVID-19 pandemic control.
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jan;293:114677. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114677. Epub 2021 Dec 22.
6
Exposure to the COVID-19 pandemic environment and generosity.
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Jan 12;9(1):210919. doi: 10.1098/rsos.210919. eCollection 2022 Jan.
7
How the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic impacted pro-social behaviour and individual preferences: Experimental evidence from China.
J Econ Behav Organ. 2021 Oct;190:480-494. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2021.08.001. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
8
Altruism and vaccination intentions: Evidence from behavioral experiments.
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jan;292:114195. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114195. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
9
Trust in scientists in times of pandemic: Panel evidence from 12 countries.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Oct 5;118(40). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2108576118.
10
Prosociality and Social Responsibility Were Associated With Intention of COVID-19 Vaccination Among University Students in China.
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Aug 1;11(8):1562-1569. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.64. Epub 2021 Jun 26.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验